Project VOICES: Vocal Optimization in Children Elevating the Spectrum
NCT ID: NCT06875843
Last Updated: 2025-05-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-04-25
2028-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Using a Voice Output Communication Aid to Facilitate Language Development in Young Children With ASD
NCT01816178
Stimulus-Stimulus Pairing Study
NCT02464527
Word Learning in Children With Autism
NCT03419611
Optimizing Feedback-based Learning in Children With Developmental Language Disorder
NCT05678634
Strategies for Teaching Verbs
NCT03441685
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Contingent responses
Participants engage in three conditions: (a) contingent responses, (b) contingent responses with vocal elicitation strategies, (c) non-contingent control
Contingent responses
The adult systematically responds to more complex child vocalizations with more complex responses. When the child first vocalizes, the adult imitates that vocalization. The child's response determines the next adult response. If the child produces a vocalization within 3 seconds, the adult imitates the child, provides a linguistic map (i.e., puts the apparent meaning into words), and complies nonverbally with the child's apparent intent (e.g., giving item or action). If the child does not produce another vocalization within 3 seconds, the adult remains quiet until the child vocalizes again.
Contingent responses plus vocal elicitation strategies
The adult follows the contingent responses condition protocol with the addition of using vocal toys (e.g., echo tubes, microphones that distort voices, and microphones that amplify voices) within exciting turn-taking activities/routines (e.g., blowing bubbles, balloons, and whoopee cushions). The vocal elicitation strategies emphasize the need to help children vocalize to initiate child-adult interactions. These strategies may be especially important for children who vocalize infrequently to benefit from other intervention aspects and enhance their spoken language skills. The vocal elicitation strategies are to be used when needed, rather than being obligatory for every adult-child interaction. If the child vocalizes without a vocal elicitation prompt, the adult still responds to the vocalization
Non-contingent control
The adult provides non-contingent vocal responses based on audio recordings from prior contingent responses condition sessions transmitted via a wireless earpiece. Recordings from these yoked sessions control for number and type of adult vocalizations and minimize the degree of contingency between adult and child vocalizations in this condition.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Contingent responses
The adult systematically responds to more complex child vocalizations with more complex responses. When the child first vocalizes, the adult imitates that vocalization. The child's response determines the next adult response. If the child produces a vocalization within 3 seconds, the adult imitates the child, provides a linguistic map (i.e., puts the apparent meaning into words), and complies nonverbally with the child's apparent intent (e.g., giving item or action). If the child does not produce another vocalization within 3 seconds, the adult remains quiet until the child vocalizes again.
Contingent responses plus vocal elicitation strategies
The adult follows the contingent responses condition protocol with the addition of using vocal toys (e.g., echo tubes, microphones that distort voices, and microphones that amplify voices) within exciting turn-taking activities/routines (e.g., blowing bubbles, balloons, and whoopee cushions). The vocal elicitation strategies emphasize the need to help children vocalize to initiate child-adult interactions. These strategies may be especially important for children who vocalize infrequently to benefit from other intervention aspects and enhance their spoken language skills. The vocal elicitation strategies are to be used when needed, rather than being obligatory for every adult-child interaction. If the child vocalizes without a vocal elicitation prompt, the adult still responds to the vocalization
Non-contingent control
The adult provides non-contingent vocal responses based on audio recordings from prior contingent responses condition sessions transmitted via a wireless earpiece. Recordings from these yoked sessions control for number and type of adult vocalizations and minimize the degree of contingency between adult and child vocalizations in this condition.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Aged 2 to 5 years old
* Use no more than 20 words (spoken, signed, or via augmentative and alternative communication) per parent report
* Use of \< 5 different words during a 15-min communication sample
* Use of at least one consonant (observed or reported)
* Primary language of English
* Have a child enrolled in the study (One caregiver per child participant is enrolled.)
* Sufficient English skills to complete surveys
Exclusion Criteria
* Evidence of severe motor impairment
Caregiver participants
2 Years
5 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jena McDaniel
Assistant professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
250043
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.