Comparative Study of Blood Loss in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy by Ligation the Uterine Arteries in Different Techniques.

NCT ID: NCT06875518

Last Updated: 2025-06-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-03-12

Study Completion Date

2025-12-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Following Caesarean section, hysterectomy is the second most common major gynecological surgery, with approximately 600,000 procedures performed annually in the USA. Since Reich et al. first reported a total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) in 1989, numerous studies have confirmed its feasibility and reproducibility. Evidence increasingly supports TLH over vaginal hysterectomy (VH) and total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) for benign gynecological conditions. The development and rapid advancement of laparoscopic instruments and techniques have enabled the safe and successful completion of complex procedures using minimally invasive approaches. Women with a higher BMI or requiring complex surgeries benefit from reduced postoperative complications with laparoscopic operations.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gynecologic Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control group

Group 1 (BTLH with bilateral uterine artery ligation from its origin): The round ligament close to the pelvic side wall is first coagulated and separated before the procedure is applied.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

BTLH with bilateral uterine artery ligation from its origin

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The round ligament close to the pelvic side wall is first coagulated and separated before the procedure is applied. Further incision is then made in the peritoneum. The bladder fold is pulled downward by opening the anterior leaf of the wide ligament. It shows the ureters lateralized and the posterior leaf of the wide ligament. After that, the ureters' path is shown, the retroperitoneal area is revealed, and the location where the uterine artery leaves the iliac artery is seen.

Conventional TLH

The conventional TLH technique involved division of the corneal pedicles and securing the uterine pedicles. Preoperative Preparation of bowel wasn't routinely done to improve enhanced recovery of patients.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional TLH

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The conventional TLH technique involved division of the corneal pedicles and securing the uterine pedicles. Preoperative Preparation of bowel wasn't routinely done to improve enhanced recovery of patients. Antibiotic prophylaxis with 3rd generation cephalosporin and metronidazole was given one hour preoperatively. Obese patients received subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin and compression devices after surgery. Under general anesthesia, patients were placed in a Lloyd Davis position.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

BTLH with bilateral uterine artery ligation from its origin

The round ligament close to the pelvic side wall is first coagulated and separated before the procedure is applied. Further incision is then made in the peritoneum. The bladder fold is pulled downward by opening the anterior leaf of the wide ligament. It shows the ureters lateralized and the posterior leaf of the wide ligament. After that, the ureters' path is shown, the retroperitoneal area is revealed, and the location where the uterine artery leaves the iliac artery is seen.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conventional TLH

The conventional TLH technique involved division of the corneal pedicles and securing the uterine pedicles. Preoperative Preparation of bowel wasn't routinely done to improve enhanced recovery of patients. Antibiotic prophylaxis with 3rd generation cephalosporin and metronidazole was given one hour preoperatively. Obese patients received subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin and compression devices after surgery. Under general anesthesia, patients were placed in a Lloyd Davis position.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients aged between 35-60 years Patients presented with menometrorrhagia unresponsive to medical treatment, and uterine pathology such as adenomyosis or multiple fibroids.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients were excluded if they had: medical conditions preventing pneumo-peritoneum
* Patients with medical conditions hindering proper ventilation during general anesthesia.
* Patients diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma and patients with uterine size larger than 24 weeks were excluded.
* Patients with excessive adhesions precluding access to the uterine arteries were not enrolled in the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

35 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mostafa Bahaa

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mostafa Bahaa

Lecturer

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mostafa Bahaa

Damietta, New Damietta, Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Mostafa Bahaa, PhD

Role: primary

0201025538337

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

8749

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

LESS-TLH Versus LESS-LAVH
NCT01861067 COMPLETED PHASE3