Laparoscopic Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy in Women With Abnormal Uterine Bleeding Using Bipolar Vessel Sealer

NCT ID: NCT04237558

Last Updated: 2022-09-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

52 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-04-01

Study Completion Date

2022-04-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will be a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the surgical performance and outcome of total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to non-descent vaginal hysterectomy ,using bipolar vessel sealer,in cases of abnormal uterine bleeding in Mansoura University Hospital in order to reach the optimum technique for our locality

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Hysterectomy is the surgical removal of the uterus. It is the commonest major gynecological surgery, next to caesarean section, with millions of procedures performed annually throughout the world.Approximately 90% of hysterectomies are performed for benign conditions.

Although there are many approaches to hysterectomy, which depend on clinical criteria, certain patients may be eligible to be operated in any of the several available approaches. The optimal route of hysterectomy for a patient will depend on the pathological nature, size and shape of the vagina and uterus, uterine descent, endometriosis and the likelihood of pelvic adhesions, adnexal masses, previous pelvic surgery, available hospital technology, devices and the surgeon's preference.

Approaches to hysterectomy may be broadly categorized into four options: abdominal hysterectomy (AH); vaginal hysterectomy (VH); laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) where at least some of the operation is conducted laparoscopically and robotic-assisted hysterectomy (RH).Vaginal and laparoscopic procedures are considered "minimally invasive" surgical approaches because they do not require a large abdominal incision and, thus, typically are associated with shortened hospitalization and postoperative recovery times compared with open abdominal hysterectomy.

This study will be a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the surgical performance and outcome of total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to non-descent vaginal hysterectomy, using bipolar vessel sealer, in cases of abnormal uterine bleeding in order to reach the optimum technique with lower cost to be easily applied to low resource settings.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Uterine Bleeding

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

comparison between laparoscopic hysterectomy versus non-descent vaginal hysterectomy using bipolar vessel sealers in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Vaginal hysterectomy

Removal of uterus through vagina in absence of prolapse

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Vaginal hysterectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Vaginal hysterectomy by removal of uterus through vagina in absence of prolapse

Laparoscopic hysterectomy

Key hole surgery through small incisions of the abdomen

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Laparoscopic hysterectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic hysterectomy through key hole surgery through small incisions of the abdomen

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Vaginal hysterectomy

Vaginal hysterectomy by removal of uterus through vagina in absence of prolapse

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic hysterectomy

Laparoscopic hysterectomy through key hole surgery through small incisions of the abdomen

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women assigned for performing hysterectomy for abnormal uterine bleeding due to benign pathology.
* Uterine size by bimanual examination ≤14 weeks gestational size.
* Cases with uterine volumes ≤ 400cm3 will be included in this study.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with BMI \> 30kg/m2
* Uteri \> 14 weeks gestational size by bimanual examination or volume \> 400cm3
* Women with positive pap smear for CIN or endometrial biopsy with atypia or carcinoma.
* Patient with other known body malignancy.
* Patient with other pelvic pathology, endometriosis or pelvic abscesses.
* Patients with abdominal scars.
Minimum Eligible Age

35 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mansoura University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Amany A Makroum, MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mansoura University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mansoura University Hospital

Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AM1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.