Laparoscopic Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy in Women With Abnormal Uterine Bleeding Using Bipolar Vessel Sealer
NCT ID: NCT04237558
Last Updated: 2022-09-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
52 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-04-01
2022-04-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison Between D&C and Hysteroscopy in Management of AUB in Perimenopausal Women
NCT02705222
Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy vs Minilap Hysterectomy
NCT03251677
Hysteroscopic Septoplasty by Different Modalities
NCT05802784
Uterine Artery Ligation at Origin in Total Laparscopic Hystrectomy
NCT04808583
Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Bilateral Uterine Artery Ligation in Decreasing Blood Loss in Trans-abdominal Myomectomy
NCT02643186
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Although there are many approaches to hysterectomy, which depend on clinical criteria, certain patients may be eligible to be operated in any of the several available approaches. The optimal route of hysterectomy for a patient will depend on the pathological nature, size and shape of the vagina and uterus, uterine descent, endometriosis and the likelihood of pelvic adhesions, adnexal masses, previous pelvic surgery, available hospital technology, devices and the surgeon's preference.
Approaches to hysterectomy may be broadly categorized into four options: abdominal hysterectomy (AH); vaginal hysterectomy (VH); laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) where at least some of the operation is conducted laparoscopically and robotic-assisted hysterectomy (RH).Vaginal and laparoscopic procedures are considered "minimally invasive" surgical approaches because they do not require a large abdominal incision and, thus, typically are associated with shortened hospitalization and postoperative recovery times compared with open abdominal hysterectomy.
This study will be a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the surgical performance and outcome of total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to non-descent vaginal hysterectomy, using bipolar vessel sealer, in cases of abnormal uterine bleeding in order to reach the optimum technique with lower cost to be easily applied to low resource settings.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Vaginal hysterectomy
Removal of uterus through vagina in absence of prolapse
Vaginal hysterectomy
Vaginal hysterectomy by removal of uterus through vagina in absence of prolapse
Laparoscopic hysterectomy
Key hole surgery through small incisions of the abdomen
Laparoscopic hysterectomy
Laparoscopic hysterectomy through key hole surgery through small incisions of the abdomen
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Vaginal hysterectomy
Vaginal hysterectomy by removal of uterus through vagina in absence of prolapse
Laparoscopic hysterectomy
Laparoscopic hysterectomy through key hole surgery through small incisions of the abdomen
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Uterine size by bimanual examination ≤14 weeks gestational size.
* Cases with uterine volumes ≤ 400cm3 will be included in this study.
Exclusion Criteria
* Uteri \> 14 weeks gestational size by bimanual examination or volume \> 400cm3
* Women with positive pap smear for CIN or endometrial biopsy with atypia or carcinoma.
* Patient with other known body malignancy.
* Patient with other pelvic pathology, endometriosis or pelvic abscesses.
* Patients with abdominal scars.
35 Years
60 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mansoura University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Amany A Makroum, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mansoura University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mansoura University Hospital
Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AM1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.