Using Clinical Decision Support to Provide Social Risk-Informed Care for Opioid Use Disorder in the Emergency Department

NCT ID: NCT06872190

Last Updated: 2025-05-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-04-20

Study Completion Date

2027-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The overarching goal of this proposal is to integrate patient social risk information into an existing electronic health record (EHR)-based clinical decision support (CDS) tool (CDSv1) to facilitate emergency department (ED)-initiated, social risk-informed opioid use disorder (OUD) medication treatment and ultimately improve treatment adherence and follow up. The investigators will evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the social care-enhanced CDS tool, CDSv2, (compared to CDSv1) at a single study site (UCSF) as an intervention to increase medication treatment adherence and follow up for adult ED patients experiencing opioid use disorder using a mixed-methods, before-after approach.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Over 2.7 million people suffer from opioid use disorder (OUD) in the United States (US), resulting in more than 80,000 opioid overdose deaths in 2021. Medications for opioid use disorder are underused disproportionately in patients living in poverty, whose unmet food, housing, and transportation needs impede access to medications and routine healthcare. Emergency departments (EDs) are the primary (and often only) healthcare access points for vulnerable populations with social needs, including people with OUD. In response, healthcare professional organizations have increasingly called for ED-initiated medications for OUD (MOUD), which has been shown to lead to better adherence compared to referrals to treatment alone.

Clinical decision support (CDS) tools in electronic health records (EHRs) can be used to support ED-initiated MOUD. They enhance care quality by providing actionable information to clinicians in real time; a study of a CDS tool for MOUD showed that it significantly increased the number of MOUD prescribers. A major risk of ED-initiated MOUD, however, is that it could lead to inequitable outcomes unless closely paired with efforts to connect patients to services that also address social needs. For instance, patients with food or housing insecurity are unlikely to prioritize adherence to MOUD over meeting their basic material needs; patients with MOUD who lack reliable transportation may be unable to access follow up care for MOUD. Linking social interventions to MOUD initiation may improve the likelihood of adherence to treatment and follow-up care. Though CDS tools that use patients' social risk data have been developed to improve care for other chronic diseases, e.g., hypertension and diabetes, to date, the CDS tools that facilitate ED-initiated MOUD have not been designed to harness social risk information to improve MOUD care planning. There is an urgent need to design and test a CDS tool that simultaneously facilitates MOUD initiation and helps identify and intervene on patients' social needs.

The overarching goal of this project is to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a social care-enhanced CDS tool (CDSv2) designed to facilitate ED-based, social risk-informed MOUD compared to an existing CDS tool for ED-based MOUD (CDSv1), with the ultimate goal of improving treatment adherence and follow up for ED patients experiencing OUD.

Specific Aim: Assess the feasibility and acceptability of the social care-enhanced CDS tool (CDSv2, compared to CDSv1) at the UCSF ED as an intervention to improve medication treatment adherence and follow up for adult ED patients experiencing OUD. The investigators will perform a mixed-methods, before-after pilot study evaluating the basic CDS tool (CDSv1) and the social care-enhanced CDS tool (CDSv2) over 28 months. To assess feasibility of patient recruitment and primary endpoint collection (e.g, adherence, follow up), the investigators will perform chart review and outreach to patients. To measure clinician utilization and acceptability, the investigators will collect EHR-based audit log and survey data. The investigators will also conduct semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of ED clinicians and patients to further capture their experiences (acceptability) with the social care-enhanced CDS tool and the basic CDS tool.

The expected sample size of 300 will include 240 providers and 60 patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Opioid Use Disorder Social Determinants of Health (SDOH)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SEQUENTIAL

The investigators will first deploy CDSv1 and collect outcomes with CDSv1, while they build CDSv2. After a brief wash-in period, they will deploy CDSv2 and collection outcomes on CDSv2.
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ED-Based Clinical Decision Support for Opioid Use Disorder

Emergency providers will have access to the basic ED-based clinical decision support tool for opioid use disorder.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

ED-Based Clinical Decision Support for Opioid Use Disorder

Intervention Type OTHER

The original clinical decision support (CDS) tool, EMergency department initiated BuprenorphinE for opioid use Disorder or EMBED, was designed by researchers at Yale to support emergency department (ED) clinicians with varying levels of experience prescribing buprenorphine for patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). The tool alerts ED providers of a patient who is potentially eligible for MOUD using Epic's storyboard. The provider must then click on the notification to open the OUD evaluation tool, which has multiple components: OUD assessment, OUD diagnosis, withdrawal assessment, and readiness for treatment. These components are then paired with an orderset, "ED Opioid Use Disorder Treatment" that includes nursing orders, prescriptions for buprenorphine and ancillary medications, and substance use disorder discharge resources.

Social Care-Enhanced Clinical Decision Support for Opioid Use Disorder

Emergency providers will no longer have access to the basic ED-based clinical decision support tool for opioid use disorder, but will instead have access to the social care-enhanced clinical decision support tool for opioid use disorder.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Social Care-Enhanced Clinical Decision Support for Opioid Use Disorder

Intervention Type OTHER

The investigators will use human-centered design to adapt the basic CDS tool to incorporate patient social needs, involving patients, staff, and end-user ED clinicians in the iterative design process. This tool is being actively developed.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ED-Based Clinical Decision Support for Opioid Use Disorder

The original clinical decision support (CDS) tool, EMergency department initiated BuprenorphinE for opioid use Disorder or EMBED, was designed by researchers at Yale to support emergency department (ED) clinicians with varying levels of experience prescribing buprenorphine for patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). The tool alerts ED providers of a patient who is potentially eligible for MOUD using Epic's storyboard. The provider must then click on the notification to open the OUD evaluation tool, which has multiple components: OUD assessment, OUD diagnosis, withdrawal assessment, and readiness for treatment. These components are then paired with an orderset, "ED Opioid Use Disorder Treatment" that includes nursing orders, prescriptions for buprenorphine and ancillary medications, and substance use disorder discharge resources.

Intervention Type OTHER

Social Care-Enhanced Clinical Decision Support for Opioid Use Disorder

The investigators will use human-centered design to adapt the basic CDS tool to incorporate patient social needs, involving patients, staff, and end-user ED clinicians in the iterative design process. This tool is being actively developed.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

CDSv1 CDSv2

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All University of California, San Francisco ED providers (residents, attendings, advanced practice providers) who have used either CDSv1 or CDSv2 will be eligible to participate in surveys and interviews regarding feasibility and acceptability.
* English-speaking patients ≥18 years of age presenting to the UCSF ED with opioid use disorder who receive medication treatment (as a result of CDSv1 or CDSv2) will be eligible to participate.

Exclusion Criteria

\- Participants will be excluded if:

* they have a medical or psychiatric condition requiring hospitalization at the index ED visit,
* are actively suicidal, are cognitively impaired,
* present from an extended care facility, or
* require opioids for a pain condition.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of California, San Francisco

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Melanie F Molina, MD, MAS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of California, San Francisco

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of California, San Francisco

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Melanie F Molina, MD, MAS

Role: CONTACT

415-353-1156

Jacob Perez

Role: CONTACT

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

K23DA060993

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

24-41722

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The Emergency Department Longitudinal Integrated Care
NCT05327166 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
A Bundled Intervention
NCT06593093 RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2
ED Observation for Opioid Use Disorder
NCT05064826 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA