Using Clinical Decision Support to Provide Social Risk-Informed Care for Opioid Use Disorder in the Emergency Department
NCT ID: NCT06872190
Last Updated: 2025-05-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
300 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-04-20
2027-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Decision Support to Increase Use of Medications for Opioid Use Disorder
NCT06526286
Clinical Decision Support for Safety of Opioid Transitions
NCT06527040
Emergency Department Connection to Care With Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder
NCT03544112
Clinical Decision Support to Implement ED-initiated Buprenorphine for OUD
NCT03658642
Social Functioning in Opioid Use Disorder
NCT07044466
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Clinical decision support (CDS) tools in electronic health records (EHRs) can be used to support ED-initiated MOUD. They enhance care quality by providing actionable information to clinicians in real time; a study of a CDS tool for MOUD showed that it significantly increased the number of MOUD prescribers. A major risk of ED-initiated MOUD, however, is that it could lead to inequitable outcomes unless closely paired with efforts to connect patients to services that also address social needs. For instance, patients with food or housing insecurity are unlikely to prioritize adherence to MOUD over meeting their basic material needs; patients with MOUD who lack reliable transportation may be unable to access follow up care for MOUD. Linking social interventions to MOUD initiation may improve the likelihood of adherence to treatment and follow-up care. Though CDS tools that use patients' social risk data have been developed to improve care for other chronic diseases, e.g., hypertension and diabetes, to date, the CDS tools that facilitate ED-initiated MOUD have not been designed to harness social risk information to improve MOUD care planning. There is an urgent need to design and test a CDS tool that simultaneously facilitates MOUD initiation and helps identify and intervene on patients' social needs.
The overarching goal of this project is to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a social care-enhanced CDS tool (CDSv2) designed to facilitate ED-based, social risk-informed MOUD compared to an existing CDS tool for ED-based MOUD (CDSv1), with the ultimate goal of improving treatment adherence and follow up for ED patients experiencing OUD.
Specific Aim: Assess the feasibility and acceptability of the social care-enhanced CDS tool (CDSv2, compared to CDSv1) at the UCSF ED as an intervention to improve medication treatment adherence and follow up for adult ED patients experiencing OUD. The investigators will perform a mixed-methods, before-after pilot study evaluating the basic CDS tool (CDSv1) and the social care-enhanced CDS tool (CDSv2) over 28 months. To assess feasibility of patient recruitment and primary endpoint collection (e.g, adherence, follow up), the investigators will perform chart review and outreach to patients. To measure clinician utilization and acceptability, the investigators will collect EHR-based audit log and survey data. The investigators will also conduct semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of ED clinicians and patients to further capture their experiences (acceptability) with the social care-enhanced CDS tool and the basic CDS tool.
The expected sample size of 300 will include 240 providers and 60 patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SEQUENTIAL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ED-Based Clinical Decision Support for Opioid Use Disorder
Emergency providers will have access to the basic ED-based clinical decision support tool for opioid use disorder.
ED-Based Clinical Decision Support for Opioid Use Disorder
The original clinical decision support (CDS) tool, EMergency department initiated BuprenorphinE for opioid use Disorder or EMBED, was designed by researchers at Yale to support emergency department (ED) clinicians with varying levels of experience prescribing buprenorphine for patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). The tool alerts ED providers of a patient who is potentially eligible for MOUD using Epic's storyboard. The provider must then click on the notification to open the OUD evaluation tool, which has multiple components: OUD assessment, OUD diagnosis, withdrawal assessment, and readiness for treatment. These components are then paired with an orderset, "ED Opioid Use Disorder Treatment" that includes nursing orders, prescriptions for buprenorphine and ancillary medications, and substance use disorder discharge resources.
Social Care-Enhanced Clinical Decision Support for Opioid Use Disorder
Emergency providers will no longer have access to the basic ED-based clinical decision support tool for opioid use disorder, but will instead have access to the social care-enhanced clinical decision support tool for opioid use disorder.
Social Care-Enhanced Clinical Decision Support for Opioid Use Disorder
The investigators will use human-centered design to adapt the basic CDS tool to incorporate patient social needs, involving patients, staff, and end-user ED clinicians in the iterative design process. This tool is being actively developed.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ED-Based Clinical Decision Support for Opioid Use Disorder
The original clinical decision support (CDS) tool, EMergency department initiated BuprenorphinE for opioid use Disorder or EMBED, was designed by researchers at Yale to support emergency department (ED) clinicians with varying levels of experience prescribing buprenorphine for patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). The tool alerts ED providers of a patient who is potentially eligible for MOUD using Epic's storyboard. The provider must then click on the notification to open the OUD evaluation tool, which has multiple components: OUD assessment, OUD diagnosis, withdrawal assessment, and readiness for treatment. These components are then paired with an orderset, "ED Opioid Use Disorder Treatment" that includes nursing orders, prescriptions for buprenorphine and ancillary medications, and substance use disorder discharge resources.
Social Care-Enhanced Clinical Decision Support for Opioid Use Disorder
The investigators will use human-centered design to adapt the basic CDS tool to incorporate patient social needs, involving patients, staff, and end-user ED clinicians in the iterative design process. This tool is being actively developed.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* English-speaking patients ≥18 years of age presenting to the UCSF ED with opioid use disorder who receive medication treatment (as a result of CDSv1 or CDSv2) will be eligible to participate.
Exclusion Criteria
* they have a medical or psychiatric condition requiring hospitalization at the index ED visit,
* are actively suicidal, are cognitively impaired,
* present from an extended care facility, or
* require opioids for a pain condition.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
NIH
University of California, San Francisco
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Melanie F Molina, MD, MAS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, San Francisco
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
24-41722
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.