Clinical Decision Support to Implement ED-initiated Buprenorphine for OUD
NCT ID: NCT03658642
Last Updated: 2022-06-28
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
5047 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-11-15
2021-09-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Emergency Department Connection to Care With Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder
NCT03544112
Evaluation of a Patient Decision Aid for Emergency Department Initiated Buprenorphine
NCT07278518
Emergency Department Outcomes for Patients With Opioid Use Disorder
NCT04289363
Opioid Use Disorder in the Emergency Department: CTN 0069
NCT03023930
Emergency Department-Initiated Buprenorphine Validation Network Trial
NCT04225598
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Pragmatic trials study an intervention under the usual conditions in which it will be applied; as opposed to an explanatory trial which would test an intervention under ideal conditions. In cluster randomized trials, treatment intervention is allocated to clusters (i.e. groups of individuals) rather than individuals. This is done to manipulate the physical or social environment of the intervention when an individual intervention would likely result in contamination between intervention and control participants at the group level. The parallel cluster randomized design was chosen over a stepped wedge design due to the high likelihood of confounding by temporal trends from ongoing efforts to mitigate the opioid epidemic. A major challenge of the cluster randomized design is from potential confounding due to a limited number of heterogeneous groups. Constrained randomization offers a solution to this source of confounding by balancing key cluster-level prognostic factors across the study to avoid distorting estimates of treatment effect due to the confounding factors. This allocation technique more evenly distributes potential confounders between intervention arms by specifying the confounding factors, characterizing each cluster in terms of these factors, identifying a subset of randomization combinations of clusters that adequately balance confounding factors between intervention arms and randomly selecting one of these combinations as the allocation scheme. Potential confounders that will be used for this trial are: EHR vendor, ED annual volume, ED type (e.g., academic, community, urban, rural, etc), ratio of ED clinicians who have a waiver to prescribe BUP, current rate of ED BUP prescribing, resources in ED to facilitate management of patients with OUD, and willingness of staff to adopt the practice of ED-initiation of BUP.
Intervention:
The intervention for this study includes the user-centered CDS as well as education of ED clinicians practicing at all study sites.
The need for flexibility in the graphical user interface of the intervention resulted in the decision to develop the CDS as a web application. This provides the ability to access the tool both embedded within the EHR or directly over the Internet. The web application was developed as a single-page application (SPA) based on React JavaScript library. The CDS is a user-initiated, Substitutable Medical Applications and Reusable Technologies (SMART) on Fast Health Interoperability Resources (FHIR) application that streamlines a flow diagram of the clinical protocol for ED-initiated BUP.
The intervention's graphical user interface is an intuitive, simple layout presenting four care pathways in columns based on the patient's diagnosis of OUD, the severity of withdrawal, and readiness to start treatment. There is additional, optional decision support available for guidance to: 1) evaluate OUD severity based on diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM)-5 criteria, 2) assess withdrawal severity using the clinical opiate withdrawal scale (COWS) score, and 3) motivate patient willingness and readiness to initiate medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) treatment with a brief motivational interview. These materials are also available to share with other members of the care team via a web address, text messaging, or Quick Response (QR) code. The interface also includes a toggle switch for the user based on whether or not they have a waiver to prescribe BUP. Clinicians without a waiver cannot prescribe BUP but can administer a one-time dose of BUP in the ED for up to 72-hours. When integrated into the local EHR system, launching a care pathway enables the user to: place orders, refer for ongoing MOUD treatment, and update clinical notes.
The educational plan will be site-specific and tailored to the usual care at that institution. It will be administered within three months of the study start date. The details of the plan will be developed in partnership with local champions who self-identify an interest in helping to implement an ED-initiated BUP protocol at their site. Specifically, the education plan will be required to include:
1\) A didactic on opioid use disorder, its diagnosis, assessment of withdrawal severity, and local resources for referral for ongoing MOUD treatment, 2)Circulation and posting in each study site ED of the flow diagram of the study's clinical protocol for ED-initiated BUP. Since this protocol is considered best practice, clinicians at control sites will retain all control of their practice and be encouraged to follow this protocol even though the CDS will not be available to them. 3) Intervention sites will include strategies to increase use of the intervention by training clinicians on how to launch and use the CDS. Use of the intervention will be tracked with site-specific audit and feedback that is consistent with typical quality improvement initiatives at that site.
Given the ongoing and escalating opioid epidemic and wide scope of this trial, the investigators anticipate that there may be concomitant interventions to stem OUD at study sites during the trial. The investigators plan to permit these interventions as long as they are: (1) implemented before randomization so that they can be tracked and accounted for in the constrained randomization process, and (2) they are not a health IT intervention targeted at clinicians to initiate BUP in the ED.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Clinical Decision Support for BUP
The Clinical Decision Support (CDS) will be available for clinician use for Emergency Department (ED)-initiated buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP) with referral for ongoing medication assisted treatment (MAT) if: ED chief complaint or urine drug screen indicate opioid use. The clinician will then be prompted to complete DSM-5 checklist for OUD. If DSM-5 OUD Score\>5 and urine drug screen is positive for opioids, then the clinician is prompted to complete COWS scale. If COWS score \>12, then the clinician is prompted to order BUP. Regardless of COWS score, the clinician will be prompted to schedule an MAT appointment with BUP provider. The CDS will interface with outside MAT facilities so that making an appointment is easy and to capture data on whether an appointment has been scheduled.
Clinical Decision Support (CDS)
This clinical decision support tool will improve the clinician's ability to identify those with OUD, initiate BUP and refer the patient to ongoing Medication Assisted Treatment (MAT)
Usual Care
The CDS will not be activated and patients will receive care as usual.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Clinical Decision Support (CDS)
This clinical decision support tool will improve the clinician's ability to identify those with OUD, initiate BUP and refer the patient to ongoing Medication Assisted Treatment (MAT)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* All clinicians working in Emergency Departments in the selected sites
Patients
* 18 years or older
* Will meet an EHR-derived phenotype suggesting possible OUD will be included in the analysis
* Will be discharged from the ED
* Not pregnant
* Not currently taking any medication for Opioid Use Disorder
Exclusion Criteria
* Have a medical or psychiatric condition that requires hospitalization during the ED visit
* Have prior enrollment in the current study
* Currently in addiction treatment
* Be a prisoner or in police custody at the time of ED visit
Note: The CDS will also be available for physicians to use when patients do not meet the EHR phenotype. These patients will be excluded from the primary analyses
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
NIH
University of North Carolina
OTHER
University of Alabama at Birmingham
OTHER
Mayo Clinic
OTHER
The Cooper Health System
OTHER
University of California, Davis
OTHER
Yale University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Edward Melnick, MD, MHS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Yale University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UAB Medicine Highlands - Highlands ED, (HED)
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
UAB - University Hospital ED (UED)
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
UAB Freestanding Emergency Department of Gardendale (GED)
Gardendale, Alabama, United States
UCHealth Anschutz Medical Campus (AMC)
Aurora, Colorado, United States
UCHealth Memorial Hospital Central
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
UCHealth Memorial Hospital North (MHN)
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
UCHealth Poudre Valley Hospital (PVH)
Fort Collins, Colorado, United States
UCHealth Medical Center of the Rockies
Loveland, Colorado, United States
Bridgeport Hospital ED (BPT), YNHHS
Bridgeport, Connecticut, United States
Greenwich Hospital ED (GH), YNHHS
Greenwich, Connecticut, United States
St Raphael's Campus (SRC), YNHHS
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Lawrence + Memorial Hospital ED (L&M), YNHHS
New London, Connecticut, United States
Baystate Franklin
Greenfield, Massachusetts, United States
Baystate Wing Hospital ED
Palmer, Massachusetts, United States
Baystate Springfield Hospital ED
Springfield, Massachusetts, United States
Baystate Mary Lane Hospital ED
Ware, Massachusetts, United States
Baystate Noble
Westfield, Massachusetts, United States
UNC Hospitals Emergency Department, UNCHS
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
REX Healthcare Emergency Department, UNCHS
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
Emergency Care Center at Nash General Hospital, UNCHS
Rocky Mount, North Carolina, United States
Chatham Hospital ED, UNCHS
Siler City, North Carolina, United States
Johnston Health ED, UNCHS
Smithfield, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gao E, Melnick ER, Paek H, Nath B, Taylor RA, Loza AJ. Adoption of Emergency Department-Initiated Buprenorphine for Patients With Opioid Use Disorder: Secondary Analysis of a Cluster Randomized Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2342786. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.42786.
Melnick ER, Nath B, Dziura JD, Casey MF, Jeffery MM, Paek H, Soares WE 3rd, Hoppe JA, Rajeevan H, Li F, Skains RM, Walter LA, Patel MD, Chari SV, Platts-Mills TF, Hess EP, D'Onofrio G. User centered clinical decision support to implement initiation of buprenorphine for opioid use disorder in the emergency department: EMBED pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 2022 Jun 27;377:e069271. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-069271.
Melnick ER, Nath B, Ahmed OM, Brandt C, Chartash D, Dziura JD, Hess EP, Holland WC, Hoppe JA, Jeffery MM, Katsovich L, Li F, Lu CC, Maciejewski K, Maleska M, Mao JA, Martel S, Michael S, Paek H, Patel MD, Platts-Mills TF, Rajeevan H, Ray JM, Skains RM, Soares WE 3rd, Deutsch A, Solad Y, D'Onofrio G. Progress Report on EMBED: A Pragmatic Trial of User-Centered Clinical Decision Support to Implement EMergency Department-Initiated BuprenorphinE for Opioid Use Disorder. J Psychiatr Brain Sci. 2020;5:e200003. doi: 10.20900/jpbs.20200003. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
Melnick ER, Jeffery MM, Dziura JD, Mao JA, Hess EP, Platts-Mills TF, Solad Y, Paek H, Martel S, Patel MD, Bankowski L, Lu C, Brandt C, D'Onofrio G. User-centred clinical decision support to implement emergency department-initiated buprenorphine for opioid use disorder: protocol for the pragmatic group randomised EMBED trial. BMJ Open. 2019 May 30;9(5):e028488. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028488.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HIC 2000023783
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.