Effects of Dıfferent Tournıques and Posıtıons on Paın, Anxıety Levels and Applıcatıon Success in Perıpheral Intravenous Catheter Applıcatıon: a Randomızed Controlled Study
NCT ID: NCT06862921
Last Updated: 2025-03-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
110 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-06-01
2024-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different tourniquet and position on pain, anxiety level and success of peripheral intravenous catheter (PIC) application.
Design:
Randomized controlled experimental design.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Two Different Tourniquet Techniques on Peripheral IV Access Success Rates
NCT02389725
Efficacy of Active Versus Passive Methods in Chronic Venous Insufficiency
NCT05383469
Two Mathematical Methods to Estimate Arterial Occlusion Pressure and Tourniquet Effectiveness in Lower Limb Surgery
NCT03706859
Ultrasound Guidance Versus Anatomical Landmarks for Subclavian Vein Catheterization
NCT04690296
Comparison of Different Techniques on First Attempt Success in Difficult Vascular Access Patients
NCT04821362
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different tourniquet and position on pain, anxiety level and success of peripheral intravenous catheter (PIC) application.
Primary purpose:investigate the effect of different tourniquet and position on pain, Secondary purpose:investigate the effect of different tourniquet and position on anxiety level and success of peripheral intravenous catheter (PIC) application.
Design:
Randomized controlled experimental design.
Methods:
The randomized controlled experimental design study was conducted with 110 adult patients in the orthopedic department of a Training and Research Hospital between May 2024 and July 2024. Data were collected using the Patient Information Form, Visual Infusion Phlebitis Diagnostic Scale, Infiltration Scale, Visual Pain Scale, and Facial Anxiety Scale. PIC was applied to patients in the "Experimental Group 1" using a standard tourniquet in the supine position, to patients in the "Experimental Group 2" using a sphygmomanometer at 60 mmHg pressure in the fawler position, and to patients in the "Experimental Group 3" using a sphygmomanometer at 60 mmHg pressure in the supine position. In the control group, a peripheral intravenous catheter was applied in the fawler position using a standard tourniquet. Patients were asked to evaluate the level of pain and anxiety before and after the application. The patients were followed up for phlebitis and extravasation findings at eight-hour intervals after the application. Except for complications requiring removal of the peripheral intravenous catheter during follow-up, the PIC was removed 96 hours after application. The results were evaluated at 95% confidence intervals with a significance level of p ≤ 0.05.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental Group 1
standard tourniquet in the supine position
Control
fawler position using a standard tourniquet
Experimental Group 2
sphygmomanometer at 60 mmHg pressure in the fawler position
Control
fawler position using a standard tourniquet
Experimental Group 3
sphygmomanometer at 60 mmHg pressure in the supine position
Control
fawler position using a standard tourniquet
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Control
fawler position using a standard tourniquet
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Volunteering to participate in the research
2. Be between the ages of 18-64,
3. The planned length of hospitalization is not less than 96 hours.
Exclusion Criteria
<!-- -->
1. Coagulation, hematologic and hydration problems
2. Oncological, allergic diseases, any incision or scar tissue in the antecubital area, presence of complications due to a previously opened catheter, presence of pain, hematoma, ecchymosis in the application area, or presence of any other injection in the antecubital area on treatment days,
3. The presence of an obstacle (such as mastectomy) in the arm to be treated.
Expulsion criteria from the study:
<!-- -->
1. Dislodgement of the peripheral intravenous catheter for any reason.
2. Failure of peripheral intravenous catheter placement more than twice.
3. Discharge of the patient from the hospital.
18 Weeks
64 Weeks
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Şerife Kelle Dikbaş
MSC
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sancaktepe Martyr Prof. Dr. İlhan Varank Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Tran QK, Flanagan K, Fairchild M, Yardi I, Pourmand A. Nurses and Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Versus Traditional Venous Access: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Emerg Nurs. 2022 Mar;48(2):145-158.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2021.12.003. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
Tran T, Lund SB, Nichols MD, Kummer T. Effect of two tourniquet techniques on peripheral intravenous cannulation success: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Dec;37(12):2209-2214. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.03.034. Epub 2019 Mar 23.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Clinical Research Ethics Commi
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
Uskudar University
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.