BEhavioral and Adherence Model for Improving Quality, Health Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of healthcaRe

NCT ID: NCT06856902

Last Updated: 2025-05-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

7410 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-03-01

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Lack of adherence to treatment is a widespread issue worldwide, which leads to higher healthcare utilisation rates and even premature death. While the level of adherence may differ based on the specific condition and treatment, studies estimate that approximately 50% of medications are not taken according to the prescribed instructions. In addition, adherence rates tend to decrease even further when the treatment requires a behavioural change. Literature reviews about factors that affect people's adherence show that it is challenging to predict whom can be considered to have adherent and non-adherent behaviours. In addition, the studies highlight that it is challenging to support a person to be adherent. Based on this knowledge the BEAMER project was established (Behavioural and Adherence Model for improving quality, health outcomes and cost-Effectiveness of healthcaRe). The overall goal of the project is to improve the quality of life of individuals, enhance healthcare accessibility and sustainability, thereby transforming the way healthcare stakeholders engage with patients to understand their condition and adherence levels throughout their healthcare journey. To address the overall goal, the BEAMER project has developed a disease agnostic model named "B-COMPASS: BEAMER-COmputational Model for Patient Adherence and Support Solutions". The aim of the B-COMPASS is to identify patients' needs and preferences which enables the creation of patient-specific supports, with the intention of improving their adherence to treatment within the heterogeneity of the different disease-areas and healthcare contexts. Based on the validated BEAMER questionnaire, the B-COMPASS predicts relative adherence and offers an elicitation process of patient needs and preferences to enable targeted supports to improve patient adherence. This results in an allocation of patients to different groups based on their needs and preferences. Overall, the B-COMPASS provides patient insights that will enable more effective design of patient support, most likely resulting in better patient experience, improved adherence and lower healthcare and societal costs.

So far, several activities from a technical and user perspective have already been conducted in the project to refine the B-COMPASS. This has been done by applying an iterative mixed method approach were both stakeholders (regulator, pharma, academic/research and small and medium-sized enterprises) and end users (patients, health providers and health systems) have been involved. Despite the finetuning of the B-COMPASS, the effectiveness of the B-COMPASS hinges on empirical investigations into the structural elements that impact patient behaviour and the identification of predictive factors that can assist healthcare providers' (HCP) and Research Leads in designing more effective treatment plans (the term HCPs/Research Lead include both the individuals and the institutions where care is delivered). Therefore, validation studies will be conducted to assess the B-COMPASS's performance in six therapeutic areas (cardiovascular, endocrinology, immunology, neurology, oncology and rare diseases) with patients recruited in at least Italy (FISM), Portugal (APDP and MEDIDA) Norway (AHUS), Spain (FHUNJ and FIIBAP), The Netherlands (WDO), and Germany (UDUS). The collected data will be used to evaluate the B-COMPASS's capacity to attend to a variety of needs and challenges for adherence.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of the study is to validate the B-COMPASS in real-life settings. Overall, the purpose is to provide evidence 1) to validate the B-COMPASS (primary purpose), and 2) to demonstrate the effectiveness and implementability of the B-COMPASS (secondary purpose). The project will carry out the final iterative steps of refining the model, guided by the validation studies that have been conducted. This process will be based on evaluating the performance of the generic model across six selected therapeutic areas (cardiovascular, endocrinology, immunology, neurology, oncology and rare diseases). Study participants (patients and HCPs) will be recruited (at least) from Italy, Portugal, Norway, Spain, The Netherlands, and Germany, and the validation will evaluate the capacity to attend to a variety of needs and challenges for adherence to treatment.

Overall, the study has 8 Scientific Questions (SQs), where SQ 1-4 address the validity of the B-COMPASS (primary purpose) and SQ 5-8 address the effectiveness and implementability of the B-COMPASS (secondary purpose). The SQs are:

SQ 1 How accurately does the B-COMPASS predict the relative adherence to treatment for patients? SQ 2 How valid are the B-COMPASS groupings? SQ 3 How accurately are the patient support needs identified by the B-COMPASS? SQ 4 How reliable is the B-COMPASS over time? SQ 5 To what extent does the use of the B-COMPASS affect patient adherence to treatment? SQ 6 How do the patients perceive the received engagement with HCPs/Research Leads based on the B-COMPASS? SQ 7 How do HCPs/Research Leads perceive the B-COMPASS? SQ 8 How does the B-COMPASS impact the cost-effectiveness of healthcare utilisation?

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiovascular Diseases Endocrinology Inmunology Neurology Oncology Rare Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Overall, this study has a Mixed Methods approach as both quantitative and qualitative data will be collected and merged to answer the SQs. A Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) is chosen as study design for the quantitative data collection as the design is well suited for drawing conclusions from data about the effects of interventions (SQ 5). In addition, the remaining quantitative data needed to answer the SQs can be collected through this design. The qualitative data collection will be done by conducting individual and focus group interviews with HCPs and patients. The purpose of the qualitative data collection is to validate that the B-COMPASS groupings and identified needs of support are correct and to complement the quantitative data collected from the pilot studies. The qualitative data will provide insights into the perceptions, experiences, and preferences of the stakeholders involved in the intervention, as well as the contextual factors that may influence the B-COMPASS.
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators
After the randomization, both the investigator and the health care provider will know which group the patient is in, though some patients will understand which group they are in - this will not be announced to the patient so it is correct to write "Single-blinded (patients)".

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control arm

At the first data collection, patients will complete the BEAMER questionnaire and adherence-related measures will be collected. Based on patients' answers, the B-COMPASS will assign them into groups, list their support needs, and predict their relative adherence, forming their B-COMPASS description. Patients will then be randomised into either 1) an intervention arm, or 2) a control arm using stratified randomisation via the Adherence Intelligence Visualisation Platform (AIVP), ensuring balance in B-COMPASS descriptions, gender, and age. Control patients will receive standard care and HCPs/Research Leads will not be informed of their B-COMPASS description. Where possible, at pilot sites, HCPs/Research Leads will also be randomised to ensure that HCPs/Research Leads in the control groups have as limited knowledge of the B-COMPASS/patient description as possible.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Intervention arm

At the first data collection, patients will complete the BEAMER questionnaire and adherence-related measures will be collected. Based on patients' answers, the B-COMPASS will assign them into groups, list their support needs, and predict their relative adherence, forming their B-COMPASS description. Patients will then be randomised into either 1) an intervention arm, or 2) a control arm using stratified randomisation via the Adherence Intelligence Visualisation Platform (AIVP), ensuring balance in B-COMPASS descriptions, gender, and age. The patients in the intervention arm will receive B-COMPASS enhanced engagement in addition to standard care. The enhanced engagement is implemented as educational material to the HCP who is engaging with the patient. The content of the educational material will be based on the patient's B-COMPASS patient description. The engagement will either be in person or via phone call depending on the patient visiting schedule of each recruited patient.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

B-COMPASS implementation

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The patients in the intervention arm will receive B-COMPASS enhanced engagement in addition to standard care. The enhanced engagement is implemented as educational material to the HCP who is engaging with the patient. The content of the educational material will be based on the patient's B-COMPASS patient description. The engagement will either be in person or via phone call depending on the patient visiting schedule of each recruited patient.

B-COMPASS implementation

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

At the first data collection, patients will complete the BEAMER questionnaire and adherence-related measures will be collected. Based on patients' answers, the B-COMPASS will assign them into groups, list their support needs, and predict their relative adherence, forming their B-COMPASS description. Patients will then be randomised into either 1) an intervention arm, or 2) a control arm using stratified randomisation via the Adherence Intelligence Visualisation Platform (AIVP), ensuring balance in B-COMPASS descriptions, gender, and age. The patients in the intervention arm will receive B-COMPASS enhanced engagement in addition to standard care. The enhanced engagement is implemented as educational material to the HCP who is engaging with the patient. The content of the educational material will be based on the patient's B-COMPASS patient description. The engagement will either be in person or via phone call depending on the patient visiting schedule of each recruited patient.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

B-COMPASS implementation

The patients in the intervention arm will receive B-COMPASS enhanced engagement in addition to standard care. The enhanced engagement is implemented as educational material to the HCP who is engaging with the patient. The content of the educational material will be based on the patient's B-COMPASS patient description. The engagement will either be in person or via phone call depending on the patient visiting schedule of each recruited patient.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

B-COMPASS implementation

At the first data collection, patients will complete the BEAMER questionnaire and adherence-related measures will be collected. Based on patients' answers, the B-COMPASS will assign them into groups, list their support needs, and predict their relative adherence, forming their B-COMPASS description. Patients will then be randomised into either 1) an intervention arm, or 2) a control arm using stratified randomisation via the Adherence Intelligence Visualisation Platform (AIVP), ensuring balance in B-COMPASS descriptions, gender, and age. The patients in the intervention arm will receive B-COMPASS enhanced engagement in addition to standard care. The enhanced engagement is implemented as educational material to the HCP who is engaging with the patient. The content of the educational material will be based on the patient's B-COMPASS patient description. The engagement will either be in person or via phone call depending on the patient visiting schedule of each recruited patient.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Having the diagnosis of the pilot sites target groups described above as per clinical assessment or validated diagnosis criteria
* Having the age of the pilot sites target groups described above
* Having accepted to participate in the study and provided written informed consent
* Having the availability to participate on all study activities
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Oslo

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

PREDICTBY RESEARCH AND CONSULTING S.L.

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Pfizer

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Technical University of Madrid

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Beatriz Merino

Postdoctoral researcher

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Giuseppe Fico, Professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universidad Politecnica de Madrid

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

MEDCIDS - Departamento de Medicina da Comunidade Informação e Decisão em Saúde

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Portugal

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Giuseppe Fico, Professor

Role: CONTACT

(+34) 91 067 2636

Beatriz Merino, PhD

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Rita Amaral

Role: primary

000000000

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

101034369

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

BBAAMFIQHOACOH-GF-20241108

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Impact of Smell Testing on Health Outcomes
NCT07222891 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE2
I-ACT With Check Yourself
NCT02764190 COMPLETED NA