Ovarian Cancer Identification on CT Using Deep Learning
NCT ID: NCT06851429
Last Updated: 2025-02-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
12578 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-09-01
2025-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Assessment of the Minimal Residual Disease in Ovarian Cancer From Circulating Tumor DNA and Immune Repertoire
NCT03614689
Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer Using Plasma Cell-free DNA Fragmentomics (Retrospective Study)
NCT05693974
Retrospective Study of Ovarian Cancer Patients With Brain Metastasis
NCT01258881
Plasma ctDNA Detection in Diagnosis of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.
NCT03155451
A Study to Analyze Data on Metastatic Ovarian Cancer Using Multi-omics
NCT05251883
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Computed tomography (CT) is commonly used for ovarian cancer detection, but its effectiveness is limited by nonspecific symptoms. AI-driven CT screening has gained interest, with deep learning showing promise in cancer detection. However, challenges remain in ensuring model generalizability and optimizing technical parameters. Effective screening must minimize unnecessary surgeries, as previous trials reported high false-positive rates and surgical complications. To address this, the study developed CAT-OV, an AI-based tool for ovarian cancer detection using CT imaging. The system integrates a Body Part Regression (BPR) model for pelvic localization and a Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) ensemble classifier with five convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to predict cancer presence. CAT-OV was evaluated on three test sets: an internal dataset, an international dataset from the U.S., and a nationwide multi-institutional dataset from Taiwan.
This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and informed consent was waived. The dataset was constructed from CT scans of patients aged ≥20 who underwent ovarian surgery between 2010 and 2020 at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Malignant cases included various histopathological subtypes, while controls consisted of benign ovarian tumors and an enriched dataset of cancer-free individuals. The final dataset comprised 5,680 cases, split into a training/validation set (n=4,554) and an internal test set (n=1,126), including 173 cancer and 953 control cases. The international dataset included 40 cancer and 47 control cases from Brigham and Women's Hospital. The nationwide dataset consisted of 447 ovarian cancer cases and 1,131 controls from Taiwan's National Health Insurance database.
The BPR model, modified from ResNet50, localized pelvic regions on CT scans through unsupervised learning. Training involved preprocessing, augmentation, and regression-based subvolume selection. The MIL classification model treated each 3D subvolume as a "bag" of 2D slices, using EfficientNetV2-S as the backbone and an attention-based aggregation module for final prediction. Training involved preprocessing, augmentation, and a five-fold cross-validation strategy. The final ensemble model determined classification based on averaged logits and optimized thresholds. Visualization was performed using the Per-Sample Bottleneck technique to enhance interpretability.
Surgical histopathology served as the reference standard, reviewed by an experienced pathologist using the 2020 WHO classification. Immunohistochemical analysis was conducted to distinguish primary ovarian cancer from metastases. Tumors were staged according to the 8th edition FIGO system. This study aims to improve ovarian cancer detection and screening efficacy through AI-driven CT analysis.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
control group
The control group included both benign ovarian tumors and an enriched dataset.
No interventions assigned to this group
case group
ovarian cancer
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Female
3. undergone a CT scan
4. undergone a CT scan within 180 days prior to ovarian surgery for histopathological evaluation.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Non-female
3. Non-CT imaging
4. Incorrect image orientation
5. Number of slices \< 10
6. Slice thickness \>10 mm or \< 1 mm
7. Unsuccessful DICM-to-NIfTI
8. Pelvic subvolume extraction failed
9. Non-contrast CT scans
10. Metallic artifacts
11. Inconclusive cases
20 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Gigin Lin
Clinical Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Taoyuan, Guishan District, Taiwan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
202201271B0
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.