Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
54 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-02-15
2027-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Patients intubated, from at least 24 hours and with a predicted duration of invasive mechanical ventilation longer than 72 hours, will be randomized to the use of TRACH FLUSH versus nurse operated analogic cuff pressure controller q8.
Hypotesis of the study is the superiority of the continuous cuff pressure controller in maintaining cuff pressure within the target value, thus decreasing the incidence of microaspiration events.
Aim of the study are 1) to compare the incidence of cuff pressure value detection outside the target range between the TRACH FLUSH and the STANDARD group, and 2) to compare the incidence of sputum samples positive for (amylase and/or pepsin), a surrogate for tracheal micro-aspiration event.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Two Strategies for Endotracheal Tube Cuff Underinflation Prevention During Invasive Mechanical Ventilation
NCT03330379
Continuous Control of Polyurethane Tracheal-cuff Pressure: Efficiency of a Pneumatic Device
NCT01351259
Cuff Pressure Control and Evacuation of Subglottic Secretions To Prevent Pneumonia
NCT05403320
Continuous Control of Tracheal Cuff Pressure and Microaspiration in Critically Ill Patients
NCT01082666
Assessment of Cough Strength in Patients With Tracheostomies
NCT02566512
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The methods found in ICUs to control Pcuff and keep it within safe ranges are about a dozen and range from manual external palpation of the inflation balloon, to assessment of inspiratory/expiratory volume loss to continuous monitoring with appropriate instrumentation.
Despite the known Pcuff-related complications of ETT, there is a paucity of national or international guidelines on the optimal pressure value, frequency of pressure measurement, and measurement methods: however, some studies performed show that the use of an automated device that continuously monitors Pcuff significantly decreases gastric microaspirations.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Automated endotracheal cuff controller
The endotracheal tube cuff pressure will be continuously controlled by the Trachflush system, at pre-specifed pressure level of 25 cmH20.
Automated endotracheal cuff controller
The automated endotracheal tube cuff pressure controller will continously assess and maintain the endotracheal tube cuff pressure at pre-specifed pressure level of 25 cmH20.
Control group (analogic manometer)
The endotracheal cuff will be inflated at 25 cmH20 manually by an analogic manometer. Every 8 hours analogic manometry will be performed to assess cuff pressure.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Automated endotracheal cuff controller
The automated endotracheal tube cuff pressure controller will continously assess and maintain the endotracheal tube cuff pressure at pre-specifed pressure level of 25 cmH20.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnancy
* Previous surgery involving the airways
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Policlinico Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Giacomo Grasselli
Prof
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Alberto Zanella, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
Milan, Milan, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kumar CM, Seet E, Van Zundert TCRV. Measuring endotracheal tube intracuff pressure: no room for complacency. J Clin Monit Comput. 2021 Feb;35(1):3-10. doi: 10.1007/s10877-020-00501-2. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
Hamilton VA, Grap MJ. The role of the endotracheal tube cuff in microaspiration. Heart Lung. 2012 Mar-Apr;41(2):167-72. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2011.09.001. Epub 2011 Dec 30.
Blot SI, Poelaert J, Kollef M. How to avoid microaspiration? A key element for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia in intubated ICU patients. BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Nov 28;14:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-119.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TRAC-PRES
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.