A Trial of Actazin Versus PEG 3350 for Maintenance Therapy in Children With Constipation
NCT ID: NCT06836024
Last Updated: 2025-03-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
PHASE2/PHASE3
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-06-01
2027-02-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
1. Is it feasible to conduct a definitive, multi-centre trial comparing Actazin to PEG 3350 in children with FC?
2. What are the within-group differences in clinical outcomes such as stool frequency, abdominal pain, and laxative use over a 4-week period?
Researchers will compare chewable Actazin tablets with placebo PEG 3350 powder to PEG 3350 powder with placebo Actazin tablets to see if Actazin is a viable non-pharmacologic natural health product alternative for treating FC.
Participants will:
Undergo an initial bowel cleanout using PEG 3350 and bisacodyl. Following, they will be randomized to one of two groups:
1. Actazin chewable tablets (titrate to effect: 600-2400 mg/day) + placebo PEG 3350
2. PEG 3350 (dose based on age and titratable to effect) + placebo Actazin chewable tablets Participants will take the assigned intervention daily for 4 weeks and complete a daily bowel diary recording stool frequency, consistency (Bristol Stool Scale), abdominal pain, and laxative use. They will have weekly follow-ups via phone or electronic survey to assess adherence, medication use, and adverse events.
Additionally, a bi-weekly follow-up will be conducted for an additional 8 weeks to track longer-term outcomes.
Outcomes:
Primary feasibility outcomes include consent rate, adherence to allocated intervention, and 4-week follow-up completion rate.
Secondary clinical outcomes include resolution of FC (Rome IV criteria), weekly stool frequency, abdominal pain episodes, use of rescue laxatives, and treatment palatability.
This study is being conducted at McMaster Children's Hospital and is funded by the Hamilton Academic Health Sciences Organization (HAHSO). Data collection will be managed using the Lumedi™ platform, and safety will be overseen by a Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluating Efficacy of Investigational Products on Spontaneous Bowel Movements in Healthy People With ≤ 3 Complete Weekly Spontaneous Bowel Movements
NCT03462199
Dried Plums (Prunes) vs. Polyethylene Glycol 4000 for Treatment of Functional Constipation in Children
NCT03639142
PolyethyleneGlycol3350 Laxative vs Placebo in Constipated Children
NCT00153114
Maintenance Treatment for Children With Constipation
NCT01566409
Polyethylene Glycol for Childhood Constipation
NCT01875744
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The trial will enroll children aged 4 to 17 years diagnosed with functional constipation based on Rome IV criteria, recruited from the emergency department (ED) and outpatient clinics at McMaster Children's Hospital (MCH). The study will examine whether a larger, multi-centre trial is feasible based on recruitment rates, adherence to the intervention, and follow-up retention.
Study Design
This is a randomized, double-dummy, quadruple-masked feasibility trial evaluating Actazin against PEG 3350 for the maintenance management of pediatric FC. Sixty participants will be enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either:
Intervention group:
Actazin chewable tablets (600 mg starting dose, titrated up to 2,400 mg daily) + placebo PEG 3350 powder Comparator group: PEG 3350 powder (age-based dose) + placebo Actazin chewable tablets Participants and caregivers, bedside clinicians, outcome assessors, and investigators will all be masked to the treatment allocation. The study will last 4 weeks, followed by an additional 8-week observational follow-up to assess longer-term adherence and clinical effects.
Randomization \& Blinding:
Conducted using block randomization (blocks of 2, 4, or 6) through the Hamilton Health Sciences (HHS) Research Pharmacy. Participants will receive identically packaged drug kits containing either active treatment or placebo.
Data Collection \& Monitoring Participants and caregivers will complete a daily bowel diary electronically. Weekly remote follow-ups (phone or electronic survey) will monitor adherence, medication use, and any adverse events.
The final statistical analysis will include descriptive and exploratory methods, reporting mean differences and confidence intervals for clinical outcomes.
Statistical Analysis Plan
Feasibility analysis will be based on progression criteria:
If all feasibility outcomes meet the predefined thresholds, the trial will proceed to a definitive multi-centre RCT. If one or more outcomes fall below feasibility thresholds, protocol modifications will be considered. Clinical outcomes will be analyzed using linear regression (continuous variables) and logistic regression (binary outcomes). Adverse event rates will be compared between groups using Fisher's exact test. No formal hypothesis testing for efficacy will be conducted, as this is a pilot feasibility trial.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1
Participants will receive Active Actazin chewable tablets and placebo maltodextrin powder resembling PEG 3350:
1. Actazin oral chewable tablets with a starting dose of 600 mg (1 tablet) and can be titrated up to 2,400 mg (4 tablets).
2. Placebo PEG 3350: Maltodextrin powder, administered in the same doses and manner as active PEG 3350 group.
Actazin chewable tablet
Actazin tablets are tableted non-GMO, freeze-dried, green kiwifruit powder from 100% New Zealand-grown green kiwifruit. Currently, kiwifruit extracts (such as Actazin), are marketed in Canada as a natural supplement. It is safe, bioavailable, and has been previously shown to be well tolerated at doses up to 2400 mg.
Maltodextrin (Placebo)
Maltodextrin powder, administered in the same doses and manner as active PEG 3350 group.
Group 2
Participants will receive active comparator as PEG 3350 with a placebo chewable tablet resembling Actazin:
1. PEG 3350 dissolved in 125-250 ml of cold water or juice (daily dose is age based: 4-5 years-2 tsp, 6-12 years-4 tsp; \>13 years-5 tsp) and can be titrated by 1 tsp (3.7 grams) daily.57
2. Placebo Actazin oral chewable tablets: Sorbitol-based placebo chewable tablets made by Pharma NZ Those tablets will have a similar appearance to active Actazin but will not taste the same. This is because the taste of Actazin is a non-altered natural kiwi taste. They will be administered in the same dose and manner as the active Actazin oral chewable tablets.
PEG 3350
a commonly used over the counter laxative in north America. A stool softener.
Chewable Tablet
Sorbitol-based placebo chewable tablets made by Pharma NZ. Those tablets will have a similar appearance to active Actazin but will not taste the same. This is because the taste of Actazin is a non-altered natural kiwi taste. They will be administered in the same dose and manner as the active Actazin oral chewable tablets.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Actazin chewable tablet
Actazin tablets are tableted non-GMO, freeze-dried, green kiwifruit powder from 100% New Zealand-grown green kiwifruit. Currently, kiwifruit extracts (such as Actazin), are marketed in Canada as a natural supplement. It is safe, bioavailable, and has been previously shown to be well tolerated at doses up to 2400 mg.
PEG 3350
a commonly used over the counter laxative in north America. A stool softener.
Chewable Tablet
Sorbitol-based placebo chewable tablets made by Pharma NZ. Those tablets will have a similar appearance to active Actazin but will not taste the same. This is because the taste of Actazin is a non-altered natural kiwi taste. They will be administered in the same dose and manner as the active Actazin oral chewable tablets.
Maltodextrin (Placebo)
Maltodextrin powder, administered in the same doses and manner as active PEG 3350 group.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Fulfill Rome IV diagnostic criteria for FC;60 Must include ≥2 of the following occurring at least once per week for a minimum of 1 month: (i) ≤2 SBMs/ week; (ii) ≥1 episode of fecal incontinence/week; (iii) retentive posturing; (iv) painful or hard bowel movements; (v) presence of a large fecal mass in the rectum (rectal, abdominal or radiographic exam) and (vi) history of large-diameter stools that can obstruct the toilet.
3. Participant and their caregivers agree to exclusively use the laxatives provided as part of the trial for a 4-week period, and refrain from using any additional PEG 3350 or kiwifruit/kiwifruit extracts outside of the trial products.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Prior enrollment in trial
3. Not toilet trained; significantly different FC phenotype than toilet trained children
4. Any known hypersensitivity to kiwifruit, latex, Actazin or PEG 3350
5. Chronic health conditions (e.g., urolithiasis, ureteropelvic junction obstruction, sickle cell, cerebral palsy, hepatic, hematopoietic, renal, endocrine, or metabolic diseases) that could potentially confound the results of the study
6. Prior abdominal surgery involving the luminal GI tract, except hernia repairs
7. Concomitant use of drugs that are known to affect GI motility (e.g., opioids, domperidone, linaclotide)
8. Prior neuropsychiatric or pervasive developmental disorders such as severe non-verbal ASD, major psychiatric disorders (bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, major depression)
9. Refractory or severe FC that failed to respond to PEG 3350 and/or require combination of several laxative therapies, manual disimpaction, use of any nerve stimulation or antegrade enemas through a cecostomy or an appendicostomy
10. Absence of a parent/guardian for children who are not mature minors
11. Inability to obtain consent due to a language barrier and the absence of language translator in person or by a phone translation service available in the ED
4 Years
17 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Elyanne Ratcliffe, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
Mohamed M Eltorki, MBChB, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hamilton Health Sciences
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20240420-Kiwi
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.