Dried Plums (Prunes) vs. Polyethylene Glycol 4000 for Treatment of Functional Constipation in Children
NCT ID: NCT03639142
Last Updated: 2018-08-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE3
110 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-09-01
2020-11-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Efficacy & Tolerability Of PEG 4000 Versus PEG 3350+ Electrolytes for Pediatric Fecal Disimpaction
NCT06349031
The Efficacy and Palatability of Developed Polyethylene Glycol-based Formula for Children With Functional Constipation
NCT06357897
Polyethylene Glycol for Childhood Constipation
NCT01875744
Prucalopride in Pediatric Subjects With Functional Constipation
NCT01330381
Maintenance Treatment for Children With Constipation
NCT01566409
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
During the study period, every week investigator will call the patients parents to assess compliance with the study protocol.
Second visit will take place at the end of the trial (4th week). During this visit, investigators will collect stool diaries. Prunes used in the study will be purchased by parents of the children. It will be advised for parents to buy prunes under the trade mark of "Makar" in order to avoid product composition variability bias. Choice of the trade mark was taken considering the price of a product.
This study is designed as a randomized, open label controlled trial with 1:1 allocation. In order to obtain comparable groups, block randomisation will be performed (each block will contain four patients: two in the intervention group and two in the control group). The randomisation list will be generated using the statistical program StatsDirect by an independent person and will be kept by a staff member not involved in the trial.
Based on available data in the literature, we assume that a clinically significant difference in the effectiveness is 15%. To detect such a difference between the study groups with a power of 80% and alpha of 5%, a sample of 100 children is needed. Assuming approximately 10% loss to follow-up, we aim to recruit a total of 110 children for this study.
The Ethical Committee of the Medical University of Warsaw will be asked for approval for the study before recruitment commenced. Any modifications to the protocol that may affect the conduct of the study will be presented to the Ethical Committee. Verbal and written information regarding informed consent will be presented to the caregivers.
All analysis will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis, including all patients in the groups to which they are randomized for whom outcomes are available (including drop-outs and withdrawals). Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize baseline characteristics. The Student t test will be used to compare mean values of continuous variables for approximating a normal distribution. For non normally distributed variables, the Mann-Whitney U test will be used. The chi-square or Fisher exact test will be used, when appropriate, to compare percentages. For continuous outcomes, differences in means or differences in medians (depending on the distribution of the data), and for dichotomous outcomes, the RR and number needed to treat, all with a 95% CI, will be calculated. The difference between study groups will be considered significant when the 95% CI for RR does not include 1.0, or when the 95% CI for MD does not include 0. All statistical tests will be 2-tailed and performed at the 5% level of significance.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Plum group
Children will receive plums at dose 3,5g/kg/d as an oral treatment for constipation.
Prunus domestica
Patients will receive prunes at dose 3,5 g/kg/d (max.100mg/day) in three portions a day, for 4 weeks (amount of prescribed prunes will be calibrated with the weight that child ought to have on WHO growth charts at 50th percentile). Prunes should be introduced every day in three meals. Prunes can be chopped or grinded before eating them. They can be eaten alone or child may eat them as a part of bigger meal (which is preferred version). Prunes can be introduced with yogurt, cereals, nuts and seeds as a morning meal.
Polyethylene glycol group
Children will receive PEG at dose 0,5g/kg/d as an oral treatment for constipation.
Polyethylene Glycol 4000
Patients will receive PEG at dose 0,5 g/kg/d once daily orally, for 4 weeks.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Prunus domestica
Patients will receive prunes at dose 3,5 g/kg/d (max.100mg/day) in three portions a day, for 4 weeks (amount of prescribed prunes will be calibrated with the weight that child ought to have on WHO growth charts at 50th percentile). Prunes should be introduced every day in three meals. Prunes can be chopped or grinded before eating them. They can be eaten alone or child may eat them as a part of bigger meal (which is preferred version). Prunes can be introduced with yogurt, cereals, nuts and seeds as a morning meal.
Polyethylene Glycol 4000
Patients will receive PEG at dose 0,5 g/kg/d once daily orally, for 4 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
1 Year
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medical University of Warsaw
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Piotr Dziechciarz, MD
Principal Investigator
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Attaluri A, Donahoe R, Valestin J, Brown K, Rao SS. Randomised clinical trial: dried plums (prunes) vs. psyllium for constipation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Apr;33(7):822-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04594.x. Epub 2011 Feb 15.
Benninga MA, Faure C, Hyman PE, St James Roberts I, Schechter NL, Nurko S. Childhood Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: Neonate/Toddler. Gastroenterology. 2016 Feb 15:S0016-5085(16)00182-7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.016. Online ahead of print.
Chmielewska A, Horvath A, Dziechciarz P, Szajewska H. Glucomannan is not effective for the treatment of functional constipation in children: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. Clin Nutr. 2011 Aug;30(4):462-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2011.01.012. Epub 2011 Feb 12.
Dehghani SM, Kulouee N, Honar N, Imanieh MH, Haghighat M, Javaherizadeh H. Clinical Manifestations among Children with Chronic Functional Constipation. Middle East J Dig Dis. 2015 Jan;7(1):31-5.
Dziechciarz P, Horvath A, Szajewska H. Polyethylene glycol 4000 for treatment of functional constipation in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015 Jan;60(1):65-8. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000543.
Horvath A, Dziechciarz P, Szajewska H. Glucomannan for abdominal pain-related functional gastrointestinal disorders in children: a randomized trial. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 May 28;19(20):3062-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i20.3062.
Koppen IJ, Nurko S, Saps M, Di Lorenzo C, Benninga MA. The pediatric Rome IV criteria: what's new? Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Mar;11(3):193-201. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2017.1282820. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
Lever E, Cole J, Scott SM, Emery PW, Whelan K. Systematic review: the effect of prunes on gastrointestinal function. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Oct;40(7):750-8. doi: 10.1111/apt.12913. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
Mugie SM, Benninga MA, Di Lorenzo C. Epidemiology of constipation in children and adults: a systematic review. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2011 Feb;25(1):3-18. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.12.010.
Tabbers MM, DiLorenzo C, Berger MY, Faure C, Langendam MW, Nurko S, Staiano A, Vandenplas Y, Benninga MA; European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition; North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology. Evaluation and treatment of functional constipation in infants and children: evidence-based recommendations from ESPGHAN and NASPGHAN. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014 Feb;58(2):258-74. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000266.
Zeevenhooven J, Koppen IJ, Benninga MA. The New Rome IV Criteria for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders in Infants and Toddlers. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2017 Mar;20(1):1-13. doi: 10.5223/pghn.2017.20.1.1. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1/2018
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.