Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
92 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-04-30
2010-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Polyethylene Glycol for Childhood Constipation
NCT01875744
Dietary Fiber Mixture in Constipated Pediatric Patients
NCT01333787
Soy Polysaccharide Fiber for the Treatment of Chronic Constipation in Children: a Randomized, Double-blind Trial
NCT01267370
Maintenance Treatment for Children With Constipation
NCT01566409
Effect of a Mixture of Fibers and Carbohydrates on Intestinal Transit in Children Diagnosed With Functional Constipation
NCT04028258
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Glucomannan, a water-soluble fiber polysaccharide from the tubers of the Japanese Konjac plant, has been reported to be effective in constipated children. To date, 2 randomized trials were performed.1,2 One evaluated the effect as glucomannan as an adjunct to standard treatment.1 Another was conducted in neurologically impaired children, who constitute a specific population that cannot be compared to patients with functional constipation.2 In both trials, the number of patients was relatively small.
Well-powered, randomized controlled study is required to evaluate clinical effectiveness of glucomannan as a sole treatment in childhood functional constipation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Glucomannan
glucomannan preparation in sachets: 1 saschet of 1.26g 2 times per day (daily dosage 2,52g); duration of intervention: 4 weeks
Glucomannan
1.26 g per sachet; 2 sachets per day for 4 weeks.
Placebo
maltodextrin prepared in sachets (1,3 g per sachet); 2 sachets per day; duration of intervention: 4 weeks
maltodextrin
prepared in sachets (1.3g); 2 sachets per day for 4 weeks
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Glucomannan
1.26 g per sachet; 2 sachets per day for 4 weeks.
maltodextrin
prepared in sachets (1.3g); 2 sachets per day for 4 weeks
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* age 3 to 16 years
* informed consent from parents and/or child
Exclusion Criteria
* mental retardation
* metabolic disease (e.g. hypothyroidism)
* irritable bowel syndrome
* intake of medications influencing gastrointestinal motility
3 Years
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medical University of Warsaw
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hania Szajewska, Professor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
The Medical University of Warsaw
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Paediatrics, The Medical University of Warsaw, Poland
Warsaw, , Poland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hyman PE, Milla PJ, Benninga MA, Davidson GP, Fleisher DF, Taminiau J. Childhood functional gastrointestinal disorders: neonate/toddler. Gastroenterology. 2006 Apr;130(5):1519-26. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.11.065.
Belsey J, Greenfield S, Candy D, Geraint M. Systematic review: impact of constipation on quality of life in adults and children. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010 May;31(9):938-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04273.x. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
Pijpers MA, Tabbers MM, Benninga MA, Berger MY. Currently recommended treatments of childhood constipation are not evidence based: a systematic literature review on the effect of laxative treatment and dietary measures. Arch Dis Child. 2009 Feb;94(2):117-31. doi: 10.1136/adc.2007.127233. Epub 2008 Aug 19.
Loening-Baucke V, Miele E, Staiano A. Fiber (glucomannan) is beneficial in the treatment of childhood constipation. Pediatrics. 2004 Mar;113(3 Pt 1):e259-64. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.3.e259.
Staiano A, Simeone D, Del Giudice E, Miele E, Tozzi A, Toraldo C. Effect of the dietary fiber glucomannan on chronic constipation in neurologically impaired children. J Pediatr. 2000 Jan;136(1):41-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(00)90047-7.
Chmielewska A, Horvath A, Dziechciarz P, Szajewska H. Glucomannan is not effective for the treatment of functional constipation in children: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. Clin Nutr. 2011 Aug;30(4):462-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2011.01.012. Epub 2011 Feb 12.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KB/127/2008
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.