Glucomannan for Childhood Functional Constipation.

NCT ID: NCT01151878

Last Updated: 2017-02-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

92 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-04-30

Study Completion Date

2010-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether administration of glucomannan (dietary fiber) is effective in treating functional constipation in children.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Constipation is a common condition in children. In many patients symptoms persist to adulthood and decrease quality of life. The standard treatment, mostly osmotic laxatives such as lactulose or polyethyleneglycols, are often ineffective and may cause adverse events. Therefore, alternative treatment measures are being searched for.

Glucomannan, a water-soluble fiber polysaccharide from the tubers of the Japanese Konjac plant, has been reported to be effective in constipated children. To date, 2 randomized trials were performed.1,2 One evaluated the effect as glucomannan as an adjunct to standard treatment.1 Another was conducted in neurologically impaired children, who constitute a specific population that cannot be compared to patients with functional constipation.2 In both trials, the number of patients was relatively small.

Well-powered, randomized controlled study is required to evaluate clinical effectiveness of glucomannan as a sole treatment in childhood functional constipation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Functional Constipation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
The participants and researchers conducting the study were blinded. Intervention products were prepared in sachets centrally by the hospital pharmacy by a person not involved in the conduct of the trial. The active product and placebo were packaged in identical sachets and labeled with one of two codes, each allocated to the experimental product or placebo. This procedure was performed by an independent pharmacist, who was the only person aware of the codes' meaning. The appearance and texture of the dry products were identical.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Glucomannan

glucomannan preparation in sachets: 1 saschet of 1.26g 2 times per day (daily dosage 2,52g); duration of intervention: 4 weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Glucomannan

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

1.26 g per sachet; 2 sachets per day for 4 weeks.

Placebo

maltodextrin prepared in sachets (1,3 g per sachet); 2 sachets per day; duration of intervention: 4 weeks

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

maltodextrin

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

prepared in sachets (1.3g); 2 sachets per day for 4 weeks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Glucomannan

1.26 g per sachet; 2 sachets per day for 4 weeks.

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

maltodextrin

prepared in sachets (1.3g); 2 sachets per day for 4 weeks

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Dicoman Junior, Vitis Pharma

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* functional constipation diagnosed according to Rome Criteria III (duration of symptoms for at least 2 months prior to study inclusion)
* age 3 to 16 years
* informed consent from parents and/or child

Exclusion Criteria

* organic cause of defecation disorders (Hirschsprung's disease, spinal anomalies or anorectal pathology; history of gastro-intestinal surgery)
* mental retardation
* metabolic disease (e.g. hypothyroidism)
* irritable bowel syndrome
* intake of medications influencing gastrointestinal motility
Minimum Eligible Age

3 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medical University of Warsaw

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hania Szajewska, Professor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

The Medical University of Warsaw

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Paediatrics, The Medical University of Warsaw, Poland

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Poland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hyman PE, Milla PJ, Benninga MA, Davidson GP, Fleisher DF, Taminiau J. Childhood functional gastrointestinal disorders: neonate/toddler. Gastroenterology. 2006 Apr;130(5):1519-26. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.11.065.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16678565 (View on PubMed)

Belsey J, Greenfield S, Candy D, Geraint M. Systematic review: impact of constipation on quality of life in adults and children. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010 May;31(9):938-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04273.x. Epub 2010 Feb 20.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20180788 (View on PubMed)

Pijpers MA, Tabbers MM, Benninga MA, Berger MY. Currently recommended treatments of childhood constipation are not evidence based: a systematic literature review on the effect of laxative treatment and dietary measures. Arch Dis Child. 2009 Feb;94(2):117-31. doi: 10.1136/adc.2007.127233. Epub 2008 Aug 19.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18713795 (View on PubMed)

Loening-Baucke V, Miele E, Staiano A. Fiber (glucomannan) is beneficial in the treatment of childhood constipation. Pediatrics. 2004 Mar;113(3 Pt 1):e259-64. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.3.e259.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 14993586 (View on PubMed)

Staiano A, Simeone D, Del Giudice E, Miele E, Tozzi A, Toraldo C. Effect of the dietary fiber glucomannan on chronic constipation in neurologically impaired children. J Pediatr. 2000 Jan;136(1):41-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(00)90047-7.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 10636972 (View on PubMed)

Chmielewska A, Horvath A, Dziechciarz P, Szajewska H. Glucomannan is not effective for the treatment of functional constipation in children: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. Clin Nutr. 2011 Aug;30(4):462-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2011.01.012. Epub 2011 Feb 12.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21320737 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KB/127/2008

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Constipation Fiber Trial
NCT02193997 COMPLETED NA