DRug-Eluting BallOOn Versus Primary Polymer-coated Paclitaxel Eluting STenting for Femoro-popliteal Lesions
NCT ID: NCT06835660
Last Updated: 2025-02-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
402 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-05-31
2028-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Primary endpoint: Freedom from loss of primary patency at 12 months: loss of primary patency will be defined as the need for target vessel revascularization and/or binary restenosis (defined as \>70% in diameter or peak systolic velocity \>2.4 m/sec at duplex examination).
Secondary objectives:
To demonstrate that a primary DCB strategy is non-inferior to a primary SEDES strategy in terms of:
* Intra-operative technical success.
* Safety at 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.
* Primary patency at 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.
* Assisted primary patency at 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.
* Secondary patency at 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.
* All target vessel revascularization at 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.
* Clinically-driven target vessel revascularization at 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.
* All TLR at 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.
* Clinically-driven TLR at 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.
* All target extremity revascularization at 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.
* Number of secondary interventions at 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.
* Binary restenosis at 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.
* Mean Rutherford category at 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.
* Mean ABI value at 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.
* Absolute claudication distance improvement at 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.
* Quality of life at 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.
* Cost at 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Efficacy of Heparin-boned Viabahn Endoprosthesis and Paclitaxel-coated Balloons for Complex Femoropopliteal Lesions
NCT06124755
Balloon Angioplasty Versus Primary Stenting for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Artery Chronic Total Occlusions
NCT01268722
Paclitaxel-coated Balloons in Femoral Indication to Defeat Restenosis
NCT01083030
Paclitaxel-eluting Balloon Angioplasty With Provisional Use of Nitinol Stent Versus Systematic Implantation of Paclitaxel-eluting Stent for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal de Novo Lesions
NCT01969630
Tack Optimized Drug Coated Balloon Angioplasty Study of the Tack Endovascular System™ in Femoropoliteal Arteries
NCT02802306
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
SEDES and DCB are therefore now recognized as two valuable options for FPL and they are both reimbursed for the treatment of such lesions. However, the choice between the two treatment strategies remains unclear. On one hand, primary SEDES allows a secure approach that limits the risk of post-angioplasty dissection and thrombosis, but a permanent metallic scaffold remains inside the treated artery, with a late risk of stent fracture and challenging in-stent restenosis. On the other hand, DCB may be at risk of early arterial recoil but allows leaving nothing behind in the arterial bed. Early recoil mandates self expandable stents implantation after DCB with an increased procedural cost in approximately 10% of patients. Since no rigorous independent trial directly compared these two strategies, this study will prospectively compare SEDES and DCB for above-the-knee FPL.
This study is a non-inferiority, prospective, comparative trial. Patients will be screened using clinical and duplex scan examinations. Patients matching inclusion criteria and without exclusion criteria will give written informed consent before the endovascular revascularization procedure.
Technically, following puncture of the femoral artery, an angiogram will be performed. The lesion(s) will be identified and crossed by a guidewire. Vessel preparation (predilatation) will be performed using PBA at the level of the lesion up to the index diameter of the artery (60 seconds minimum). Another angiogram will determine technical success or failure of the predilatation. Predilatation success is defined as the absence of flow limiting dissection and/or residual stenosis \>30%. Patients with predilatation failure will receive an adequate treatment (generally a provisional stenting) at the physician's discretion. These patients with predilatation failure will not be randomized and will not be further followed in the study. Patients with predilatation success will then be randomized intraoperatively to a DCB or a SEDES strategy using a dedicated web server with stratification on Center, Rutherford category (2-3/4) and lesion length (short vs. long lesion, as described above). Participants will be distributed between groups at a ratio of (1:1).
After the procedure, patients will be prescribed clopidogrel for 90 days and aspirin for lifelong.
Patients will be assessed at 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months follow-up with clinical and duplex-scan examination. An independent core laboratory will examine duplex-scan results.
15 national sites/recruitment centers will be involved in the study targetting 402 patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Study group (DCB)
Drug coated balloon(s) will be used for femoropopliteal lesions.
Patients assigned to the DCB group (study group) will receive DCB inflation(s) at the level of the lesions according the DCB instructions for use.
procedure of DCB implantation
Patients assigned to the DCB group (study group) will receive DCB inflation(s) at the level of the lesions according the DCB instructions for use (120 seconds inflation minimum). One or several DCBs will be inflated at the level of the lesions depending on lesions' lengths. The DCB diameter(s) will be the one(s) of the index diameter of the artery. Overlaps between zones that will receive DCB inflations will be of 10 mm to avoid any geographic miss.
Comparator group (SEBMS)
Uncovered self-expandable polymer coated paclitaxel eluting stent(s) will be used for femoropopliteal lesions.
Patients assigned to the SEDES group (control group) will receive implantation ELUVIA stents at the level of the lesion(s) according to the SEDES instructions for use.
procedure of SEDES implantation
SEDES implantation wille be performed according to the SEDES instructions for use. Stent(s) oversizing will be of 1 mm maximum. Overlaps between stents will be of 10 mm.
Completion angiogram will assess the technical success of the procedure (see endpoints definitions). The physician may then decide to add a bailout SEBMS because of flow limiting dissection and/or a new stenosis \>30%.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
procedure of DCB implantation
Patients assigned to the DCB group (study group) will receive DCB inflation(s) at the level of the lesions according the DCB instructions for use (120 seconds inflation minimum). One or several DCBs will be inflated at the level of the lesions depending on lesions' lengths. The DCB diameter(s) will be the one(s) of the index diameter of the artery. Overlaps between zones that will receive DCB inflations will be of 10 mm to avoid any geographic miss.
procedure of SEDES implantation
SEDES implantation wille be performed according to the SEDES instructions for use. Stent(s) oversizing will be of 1 mm maximum. Overlaps between stents will be of 10 mm.
Completion angiogram will assess the technical success of the procedure (see endpoints definitions). The physician may then decide to add a bailout SEBMS because of flow limiting dissection and/or a new stenosis \>30%.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subject has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to participate, and has signed a Medical Ethics Committee approved consent form.
* Rutherford category 2-4.
* Femoro-popliteal stenosis/occlusion
* Target lesion is below the origin of the profunda femoris and does not exceed the medial femoral epicondyle.
* Patent inflow artery (\<30% diameter stenosis).
* Patency of at least one infrapopliteal artery to the ankle (\<30% diameter stenosis) in continuity with the native femoropopliteal artery.
Exclusion Criteria
* Life expectancy \<24 months.
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding during study period.
* Known clotting disorders.
* Contraindication to antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulants.
* Known hypersensitivity to nitinol or paclitaxel.
* Enrollment into another study.
* Significant iliac or common femoral stenosis (\<30% diameter) requiring intervention during the index procedure.
* In-stent restenosis
* Total occlusion non-crossable by a guidewire.
* Acute thrombosis of target vessel
* Prior ipsilateral femoro-popliteal bypass.
* Implantation of a drug-eluting stent.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Raphaël COSCAS, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of Vascular Surgery, Ambroise Paré Hospital - AP-HP
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Vascular Surgery, Ambroise Paré Hospital - AP-HP
Boulogne-Billancourt, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
24RCS-REBOOST
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.