Comparison Between Arthroscopic Simple Biceps Tenotomy & Anchor Technique Tenotomy with Clinical and Ultrasound Assessment

NCT ID: NCT06833398

Last Updated: 2025-02-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

72 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-06-30

Study Completion Date

2026-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Comparison between arthroscopic simple biceps tenotomy \& anchor tenotomy technique regarding clinical outcomes \& ultrasound assessment

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This research compares two surgical techniques for addressing pathologies of the long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon: arthroscopic simple biceps tenotomy and anchor tenotomy. The LHB tendon, originating from the supraglenoid tubercle, plays a critical role in forearm supination, elbow flexion, and shoulder abduction. Pathologies affecting this tendon often cause significant shoulder pain, with surgical options including tenotomy and tenodesis. While simple tenotomy is quick and avoids implant complications, it may result in cosmetic deformities like the "Popeye" sign and muscle cramps. Anchor tenotomy, a novel technique, aims to minimize these issues by preventing the Popeye deformity. This study employs a prospective randomized double-blinded controlled trial design at Assiut University Hospitals, involving 72 patients with LHB pathologies such as tendinitis, rotator cuff tears, and subacromial impingement. Exclusion criteria include prior tenodesis or neuromuscular diseases. Clinical outcomes will be assessed using functional scores (e.g., Oxford Shoulder Score), ultrasound evaluation of tendon positioning, and follow-up examinations at intervals up to one year post-surgery. The primary outcome focuses on the presence of the Popeye deformity, while secondary outcomes include postoperative shoulder function and tendon distalization measured via ultrasound. This research aims to provide evidence-based insights into the comparative effectiveness of these two techniques in improving clinical outcomes and minimizing complications.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Simple Biceps Tenotomy Anchor Tenotomy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arthroscopic simple Biceps tenotomy

This group undergoes a straightforward arthroscopic procedure to release the LHB tendon. The technique is quick and avoids the need for implants or prolonged rehabilitation. However, it carries a risk of cosmetic deformities, such as the "Popeye" sign, and potential biceps muscle cramps postoperatively.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

No interventions assigned to this group

anchor tenotomy technique

This group undergoes a novel anchor-based tenotomy technique. The procedure aims to prevent the Popeye deformity by anchoring the released tendon in a specific position. While technically more complex than simple tenotomy, it is designed to improve cosmetic outcomes and potentially reduce postoperative complications.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Anchor Tenotomy Technique:

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Anchor Tenotomy Technique: This is a novel arthroscopic method where, after releasing the LHB tendon, it is anchored in place to prevent distal migration. The goal of this technique is to avoid the Popeye deformity and improve cosmetic outcomes while maintaining functional integrity. This procedure is technically more challenging and may involve a longer operative time compared to simple tenotomy.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Arthroscopic Simple Biceps Tenotomy:

Arthroscopic Simple Biceps Tenotomy: This procedure involves an arthroscopic release of the LHB tendon from its attachment at the superior glenoid labrum. It is a quick and simple technique that does not require implants or extensive postoperative rehabilitation. The main drawback is the potential for developing a "Popeye" deformity, where the biceps muscle bulges due to distal migration, as well as occasional muscle cramps.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Anchor Tenotomy Technique:

Anchor Tenotomy Technique: This is a novel arthroscopic method where, after releasing the LHB tendon, it is anchored in place to prevent distal migration. The goal of this technique is to avoid the Popeye deformity and improve cosmetic outcomes while maintaining functional integrity. This procedure is technically more challenging and may involve a longer operative time compared to simple tenotomy.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with LHB pathologies such as :

Biceps tendinitis Rotator cuff tears Subacromial impengiment Instability \& traumatic causes

Exclusion Criteria

* LHB Tenodesis Patients with neuromuscular disease
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ahmed Sayed Shehata

resident at the Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery department

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Assiut University

Asyut, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

ahmed S shehata, bachelor of medicine

Role: CONTACT

01010527046

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Amany Omar, Vice dean of graduate studies

Role: primary

+2088 22080150 ext. +20

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

biceps tenotomy technique

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Biceps Tenodesis Versus Tenotomy
NCT01747902 COMPLETED NA