Assessment of a Wearable Ultrafiltration Device

NCT ID: NCT06832696

Last Updated: 2025-10-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

18 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-11-01

Study Completion Date

2026-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Kidney failure is common. In some people the ability of the kidneys to clean poisons out of the blood gets so low they need to be hooked up to a machine three times a week to do it for them. This is called dialysis. Unfortunately, although this treatment removes those waste products, people who need dialysis die much more often than people who don't need dialysis. Dialysis causes extreme stress on the body and leads to many organs being damaged.

Removing fluid from the body quickly causes the equivalent of repeated little heart attacks or little strokes in the brain. Many patients struggle to tolerate having all the fluid that they have drunk since their last dialysis session removed- without unpleasant symptoms of dangerously low blood pressure (which makes the damage worse).

Dialysis treatments can be done more slowly or more often, but that means having to spend a lot more time at the hospital and is difficult for the health system to be able to provide the extra treatment time.

Could extra fluid be removed in between dialysis sessions? Up to now there has not been a way to effectively do this. Investigators have now designed and built an entirely new, very small and very simplified, device that can do part of what a dialysis machine does. It doesn't clean the blood or replace the need for conventional dialysis sessions, but it can provide additional and gentle removal of fluid which wasn't able to be taken off during a standard treatment session.

If this study is successful, it will be the first time that a wearable device has been successfully built and used to take off extra fluid when dialysis patients are not in the hospital. The ability to do this opens up the possibility of, 1) helping to treat patients (both making people feel better and live longer) who can't tolerate getting off all the fluid in the short 3-4 hours they are on the dialysis machine in the hospital, and 2) helping patients who feel OK having the fluid taken off but are silently being subjected to damage to their organs due to the rapid removal, have reduced damage.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The stress of having rapid removal of fluids and waste products condensed into only a 3-4-hour dialysis treatment results in vital organs being repeatedly starved of blood and injured. Our investigators have been at the forefront of demonstrating that the poor outcomes experienced by patients are a direct result from the HD process itself, and these outcomes can be improved by making changes to the dialysis treatment. Our investigators have led the way in showing that taking off too much fluid faster than the body can tolerate causes damage to multiple organ systems; increasing risk of death and symptoms like breathlessness, intense fatigue, long recovery driving cognitive impairment in the brain, and damaging the liver and kidneys (destroying what is left of their own kidney function much faster). Failure to remove the desired amount of fluid during HD is a common occurrence (often due to patient tolerability of treatment time constraints) and is associated with worse QOL, increased HD-induced ischemic injury (heart, brain etc.). Recurrent cardiac injury and loss of contractile function leads to even poorer tolerability of HD and escalating failure to remove accumulated fluid. Patients in this challenging position typically die within 12 months whilst experiencing increased hospitalizations and adversity.

Even a modest difference in how much fluid needs to be removed is of great clinical significance. For instance, reducing the amount that is removed during a four-hour dialysis treatment by only 1 liter reduces the risk of severe heart injury (which effects the overwhelming majority of people) during that treatment.

Our investigators have completed the essential proof-of-concept phase which has allowed refinement of device design and definition of target focus. The principal focus of this next stage was to build a simplified fluid removal system directed at addressing the challenge of patients being unable to remove all the fluid they need to within the standard dialysis treatment.

The proposed study is a feasibility pilot study of both a novel device and therapeutic approach to volume management. Although significant improvement in volume status would be highly impactful, this study will still be deemed a success if initial experience supports that the use of the device is feasible and useable. Investigators intend to study 18 patients in a prospective unblinded fashion, with all recruited patients utilizing the intervention- allowing comparison of primary and secondary end points from baseline assessment and comparison after successful utilization of RUF-D.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hemodialysis Ultrafiltration

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

The proposed study is essentially a feasibility study of both a novel device and therapeutic approach to volume management. Although significant improvement in volume status would be highly impactful, this study will still be deemed a success if initial experience supports that the use of the device is feasible and useable. Efficacy measures relating to the removal of fluid have been chosen to provide objective measures and allow the development of a rational sample size calculation. Investigators aim to study 18 dialysis patients in a prospective unblinded fashion with all recruited participants utilizing the intervention - allowing comparison of primary and secondary end points from baseline assessment and comparison after successful utilization of RUF-D.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients receiving hemodialysis that struggle with fluid removal during dialysis

In patients receiving hemodialysis treatment, high amounts of fluid removed in a short time (3-4 hours) can lead to unpleasant symptoms, low blood pressure and can cause bodily stress and organ damage. Leaving this extra fluid in the body also causes undue bodily stress. Investigators need to find gentler, more tolerable ways to remove fluid from patients that need hemodialysis.

Our investigators have designed and built a new, very small and very simplified device (RUF-D) that can do part of what a dialysis machine does. It doesn't clean the blood or replace the need for dialysis treatments, but it can provide additional and gentle removal of fluid between dialysis treatments which wasn't able to be taken off during a standard treatment session.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

RUF-D

Intervention Type DEVICE

We have developed a simplified fluid removal device (RUF-D) to address the challenges that patients face with being unable to remove the fluid they need with standard dialysis. Participants 01-09 will receive one week of baseline observation (three HD treatments) with two weeks of supervised intervention using RUF-D post HD on Mondays and Wednesdays for up to six hours (total three-week study).

Participants 10-18 will receive one week of baseline observation, two weeks of intervention (identical to cohort one above), with an additional week of intervention (total four weeks) where participants will be fitted with the RUF-D (ensuring functionality) before going home with the device in operation for up to six hours twice weekly.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

RUF-D

We have developed a simplified fluid removal device (RUF-D) to address the challenges that patients face with being unable to remove the fluid they need with standard dialysis. Participants 01-09 will receive one week of baseline observation (three HD treatments) with two weeks of supervised intervention using RUF-D post HD on Mondays and Wednesdays for up to six hours (total three-week study).

Participants 10-18 will receive one week of baseline observation, two weeks of intervention (identical to cohort one above), with an additional week of intervention (total four weeks) where participants will be fitted with the RUF-D (ensuring functionality) before going home with the device in operation for up to six hours twice weekly.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* At least one of the following:

1. Average per-session IDWG ≥ 4.0% of dry weight in the last month
2. Inability to consistently achieve dry weight with current HD
3. Need for additional HD treatments to achieve prescribed dry weight
* HD sessions three times/week
* Age ≥ 18 years
* Dialyzing via central venous access
* Willing and able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Active infections
* Non-compliance to hemodialysis prescription/schedule
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Chris McIntyre

Professor of Medicine, Medical Biophysics and Paediatrics,

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dr. Christopher McIntyre, MBBS DM

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

London Health Sciences Centre

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

London Health Sciences Centre

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jarrin Penny, RN, PhD, CNeph (C)

Role: CONTACT

519-685-8500 ext. 58765

Kathy Koyle

Role: CONTACT

519-685-8500 ext. 56214

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

15436

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.