Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Ceftazidime Avibactam Versus Extended Infusions of High Dose Meropenem in Patients of ACLF With Nosocomial Infections.

NCT ID: NCT06818565

Last Updated: 2025-02-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-02-10

Study Completion Date

2026-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Acute on chronic liver failure patients are at high risk for nosocomial infections due to liver dysfunction, which impairs immune responses and increases vulnerability to infections. Key factors contributing to nosocomial infections in ACLF patients include ascites, use of invasive devices, and recent hospitalization, frequent need for broad spectrum antibiotics. Multidrug resistance is a growing issue, making treatment more challenging, common pathogens involved are gram negative bacteria such as Escherichia Coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Surveillance data show increasing carbapenem resistant enterobacterales (CRE) infection rates in cirrhotics, with high morbidity and mortality rates. The impact of these nosocomial infections is profound, significantly worsen outcomes in ACLF patients, leading to prolonged hospitalizations, increased health care costs and higher mortality rates. Early detection and effective antibiotic stewardship are essential to manage antibiotic resistance and improve patient outcomes. In this study we aim to compare efficacy and safety of Ceftazidime avibactam versus extended infusions of high dose Meropenem in patients of ACLF with nosocomial infections.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Hypothesis - We hypothesize that ceftazidime-avibactum would be superior and an effective carbapenem sparing agent compared to extended high dose carbapenems as empirical therapy in management of nosocomial infections caused by carbapenem resistant organisms in patients with ACLF.

Aim -To compare the efficacy and safety of Ceftazidime avibactam and extended infusions of high dose Meropenem as emperical antibiotic in patients of ACLF with nosocomial infections caused by carbapenem resistant organisms.

Primary objective:

• To compare the efficacy of Ceftazidime avibactam over extended infusions of high dose carabapenem as emperical antibiotic in achieving clinical response at day 3 in patients of ACLF with suspected nosocomial infections.

Secondary objectives:

* To study the spectrum of nosocomial infections, bacterial DNA and resistance genes in the context of nosocomial infections in ACLF
* Proportion of patients requiring escalation/de-escalation of antibiotics at day 3
* Incidence of clinical and microbiologic response at day 5 and day 7
* Time to escalation of antibiotics in both groups
* Transfer to icu, mortality, and progression of organ failures and worsening of AARC scores by grade I, SOFA score by point 2.
* Microbiologic outcome (Eradication/Persistence)
* To identify biomarkers of host response to empirical antibiotic regimen
* Transplant free survival at day 15 and day 28
* Proportion of patients made eligible for transplant day 7. A prospective, Randomized Control Trial. Single centre, Open label, Block randomization will be done, it will be implemented by IWRS method. This study will be conducted in Department of Hepatology, ILBS.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Meropenem

Meropenem 2gm TDS over 3 hours infusion Teicoplanin 400 mg iv BD for 3 doses f/b 400 mg iv OD

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Meropenem Injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Meropenem 2 gm iv TDS

Teicoplanin

Intervention Type DRUG

Teicoplanin 400 mg iv BD 3 doses followed by 400mg iv OD

Ceftazidime avibactam

Ceftazidime avibactam 2.5 gm iv TDS. Teicoplanin 400 mg iv BD for 3 doses f/b 400 mg iv OD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ceftazidime-avibactam

Intervention Type DRUG

Ceftazidime-avibactam 2.5 gm iv TDS

Teicoplanin

Intervention Type DRUG

Teicoplanin 400 mg iv BD 3 doses followed by 400mg iv OD

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Meropenem Injection

Meropenem 2 gm iv TDS

Intervention Type DRUG

Ceftazidime-avibactam

Ceftazidime-avibactam 2.5 gm iv TDS

Intervention Type DRUG

Teicoplanin

Teicoplanin 400 mg iv BD 3 doses followed by 400mg iv OD

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age ≥ 18 years
2. ACLF as per APASL criteria
3. ACLF patients with nosocomial infections caused by carbapenem resistant organism (defined as suspected or documented evidence of infection after 48 hours of hospitalization) requiring antibiotics.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Severe septic shock with MOF requiring escalation of antibiotics
2. Patients having known allergies to meropenem or Ceftazidime Avibactam
3. Culture sensitivity showing isolate non susceptible to study drug being investigated.
4. Already on either regimen, receiving meropenem or Ceftazidime Avibactam \>48 hours.
5. On mechanical ventilator support PF ratio \< 300.
6. Patients on immunosuppression medication
7. HCC or other malignancies
8. CKD
9. CAD
10. Pregnancy or Lactation
11. Post Liver Transplantation
12. Refusal to consent
13. PLWHA
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences (ILBS)

New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, India

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

India

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Dr Amanjot Kaur, MD

Role: CONTACT

01146300000

Prof. Rakhi Maiwall, DM

Role: CONTACT

01146300000

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Dr Amanjot Kaur, MD

Role: primary

01146300000

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ILBS-ACLF-20

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.