Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Ceftazidime Avibactam Versus Extended Infusions of High Dose Meropenem in Patients of ACLF With Nosocomial Infections.
NCT ID: NCT06818565
Last Updated: 2025-02-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
150 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-02-10
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Compare Ceftazidime-Avibactam + Metronidazole vs Meropenem for Hospitalized Adults With Complicated Intra-Abd Infections
NCT01726023
Empirical Intravenous Beta-Lactam Plus Metronidazole Vs Oral Cefixime Plus Metronidazole for the Treatment of Liver Abscess
NCT06847126
Prospective Multicenter Doubleblind Randomized Study of NXL104/Ceftazidime + Metronidazole vs. Meropenem in Treatment of Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
NCT00752219
Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous CXA-201 and Intravenous Meropenem in Complicated Intraabdominal Infections
NCT01445678
Compare Ceftazidime-Avibactam + Metronidazole Versus Meropenem for Hospitalized Adults With Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections
NCT01499290
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Aim -To compare the efficacy and safety of Ceftazidime avibactam and extended infusions of high dose Meropenem as emperical antibiotic in patients of ACLF with nosocomial infections caused by carbapenem resistant organisms.
Primary objective:
• To compare the efficacy of Ceftazidime avibactam over extended infusions of high dose carabapenem as emperical antibiotic in achieving clinical response at day 3 in patients of ACLF with suspected nosocomial infections.
Secondary objectives:
* To study the spectrum of nosocomial infections, bacterial DNA and resistance genes in the context of nosocomial infections in ACLF
* Proportion of patients requiring escalation/de-escalation of antibiotics at day 3
* Incidence of clinical and microbiologic response at day 5 and day 7
* Time to escalation of antibiotics in both groups
* Transfer to icu, mortality, and progression of organ failures and worsening of AARC scores by grade I, SOFA score by point 2.
* Microbiologic outcome (Eradication/Persistence)
* To identify biomarkers of host response to empirical antibiotic regimen
* Transplant free survival at day 15 and day 28
* Proportion of patients made eligible for transplant day 7. A prospective, Randomized Control Trial. Single centre, Open label, Block randomization will be done, it will be implemented by IWRS method. This study will be conducted in Department of Hepatology, ILBS.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Meropenem
Meropenem 2gm TDS over 3 hours infusion Teicoplanin 400 mg iv BD for 3 doses f/b 400 mg iv OD
Meropenem Injection
Meropenem 2 gm iv TDS
Teicoplanin
Teicoplanin 400 mg iv BD 3 doses followed by 400mg iv OD
Ceftazidime avibactam
Ceftazidime avibactam 2.5 gm iv TDS. Teicoplanin 400 mg iv BD for 3 doses f/b 400 mg iv OD
Ceftazidime-avibactam
Ceftazidime-avibactam 2.5 gm iv TDS
Teicoplanin
Teicoplanin 400 mg iv BD 3 doses followed by 400mg iv OD
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Meropenem Injection
Meropenem 2 gm iv TDS
Ceftazidime-avibactam
Ceftazidime-avibactam 2.5 gm iv TDS
Teicoplanin
Teicoplanin 400 mg iv BD 3 doses followed by 400mg iv OD
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. ACLF as per APASL criteria
3. ACLF patients with nosocomial infections caused by carbapenem resistant organism (defined as suspected or documented evidence of infection after 48 hours of hospitalization) requiring antibiotics.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients having known allergies to meropenem or Ceftazidime Avibactam
3. Culture sensitivity showing isolate non susceptible to study drug being investigated.
4. Already on either regimen, receiving meropenem or Ceftazidime Avibactam \>48 hours.
5. On mechanical ventilator support PF ratio \< 300.
6. Patients on immunosuppression medication
7. HCC or other malignancies
8. CKD
9. CAD
10. Pregnancy or Lactation
11. Post Liver Transplantation
12. Refusal to consent
13. PLWHA
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences (ILBS)
New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, India
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ILBS-ACLF-20
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.