Validation of a Lab-free Low-cost Screening Test for Prevention of Cervical Cancer

NCT ID: NCT06815939

Last Updated: 2026-01-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

10000 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-02-12

Study Completion Date

2026-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to validate Automated Visual Evaluation (AVE), specifically the CINFinder version developed by DL Analytics, a point-of-care screening and triage diagnostic tool for cervical cancer based on the assessment of digital images through artificial intelligence. Several teams around the world have developed versions of AVE as a triage technology but none as a screening tool.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

BACKGROUND:

Cervical cancer, caused by persistent infection of carcinogenic types of the human papillomavirus (HPV), is the second leading cause of female cancer in El Salvador. Effective screening and treatment of precancerous lesions have lowered cervical cancer rates in high-income countries, but the disease remains a leading cause of death in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). Currently, up to 80% of the disease burden and 90% of global deaths occur in LMICs primarily due to lack of resources and poor infrastructure. A new test, Automated Visual Evaluation (AVE), is a point-of-care screening and triage diagnostic tool based on the assessment of digital images through artificial intelligence.

The purpose of this study is to validate Automated Visual Evaluation (AVE), specifically the CINFinder version developed by DL Analytics, a point-of-care screening and triage diagnostic tool based on the assessment of digital images through artificial intelligence. AVE has been in development since 2021. The current study will consist of a clinical trial to compare the sensitivity of AVE (CINFinder version) with traditional screening and triage tests.

STUDY DESIGN:

This is a prospective paired interventional study of 10,000 women in San Salvador, El Salvador, to test the difference in sensitivities between AVE (CINFinder) and with other screening and triage tests, including HPV tests and unaided visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) to detect CIN2+ as a primary screening method. As a secondary aim, investigators will also validate the use of AVE as a triage test in patients with positive HPV results. Histopathology diagnosis will be used as the reference to determine true disease status.

STUDY PROCEDURES:

The design includes a screening visit, a colposcopy visit, and a result delivery and treatment visit. During the screening visit, participants will undergo routine HPV sample collection, VIA, AVE with the EVA System (digital colposcope), and an additional cervical image capture with an Android smartphone. Women with a positive screening result on any of the three main screening tests (HPV test, VIA, or AVE with the EVA System) will be referred to a second study visit to undergo HPV testing with a genotyping test, AVE with the EVA System for the second time, and colposcopy with biopsy. In addition, 5% of screen-negative women will undergo the same procedures. Results from VIA and AVE with the EVA System during the first and the second visit will be compared to determine AVE performance as a screening and triage test, respectively. Histopathology findings will serve as the reference to establish the true diagnosis of each case. Women will receive their histopathology results during the third visit and, if eligible, will be offered ablation treatment the same day. Women ineligible for ablation will be referred to LEEP or other care as appropriate.

DATA COLLECTION \& MANAGEMENT:

This specific version of AVE (CINFinder) is designed to run on both EVA System and an Android phone, alongside additional tools for improving image quality and post-screening management.The AVE software (including CINFinder, CerVisibility, and CervManager modules), will be installed as user-friendly features that can be easily accessed by authorized

Data collection: All data will be recorded in real time on paper forms OR on an electronic tablet filled out by a nurse research assistant. All forms (digital or paper) will include the date and study ID to link information to specific patients and visits. Collected data will include eligibility criteria, a background questionnaire including relevant sociodemographic and medical history traits, clinical procedures, and laboratory results. In addition, providers conducting speculum exams during the first (screening) and second (colposcopy and biopsy) visits will use the CervManager application to create a profile for each patient to input clinical information. Thus, study data will be collected on both paper forms and CervManager for added back-up security. Providers will also capture cervical images using the CervManager application on both the EVA System and an Android mobile phone. Images belonging to the same patient will be synchronized under the same study ID. Other clinical data (e.g., HPV test results, histopathology) will also be inputted into the CervManager patient profile.

Data Management: For storage and management, data from paper forms will be transferred to REDCap, an electronic data management system widely used for clinical research. CervManager and REDCap can be downloaded and merged periodically to easily identify and correct any entry errors, duplications, or missing data on either database. All AVE algorithms implemented as part of this project and used for subsequent analyses will run on DL Analytics servers.

Non-participant documentation: Investigators will document the number of eligible women who decline to participate in the study (including main reasons why). If individuals agree, Investigators will collect general, de-identified information (i.e., age range, education, and previous screening). This will be done to identify any potential source of sampling bias.

STATISTICAL POWER CALCULATIONS AND SAMPLE SIZES

Aim 1: Validate AVE as a primary screening test compared to visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) for the detection of high-grade cervical pre- cancer (CIN2+).

A study with 10,000 women will be able to detect a minimum difference of 10% between VIA and AVE with 80% power and a Type I error rate of 5%, assuming a minimum sensitivity of VIA of 65% and a correlation coefficient of the tests in the diseased population (Rho) of at least 50%. Based on the study design, all participants who test positive on any test will be referred to colposcopy with biopsy (i.e., proportion of verification = 1), as opposed to only 5% of those who are double negative being referred (i.e., proportion of verification = 0.05). Finally, based on the Investigators previous experience working in El Salvador, Investigators estimate the prevalence (lambda) of CIN2+ in the general screening population at 2%.

Objective 2. To compare AVE as a triage test compared to VIA for detecting CIN2+ among HPV-positive women.

Since all women who test positive with careHPV, VIA or AVE will undergo colposcopy with biopsy, the positive predictive value (PPV) for CIN2+ will be estimated directly using the women who test positive with a particular screening test. An unbiased estimate of NPV will be obtained by using only results for the 5% of women who are negative for the three screening tests who are randomly selected to receive colposcopy and a minimum of two biopsies. Methods that account for verification-biased sampling will be used to obtain unbiased estimates of sensitivity and specificity for CIN2+ detection.25 A method developed by Leisenring et.al. 26 will be used to test for significant differences in PPV and NPV.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Uterine Cervical Neoplasms Cervical Cancers

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental

Women eligible for HPV screening based on El Salvador's national guidelines will receive careHPV, VIA, and AVE (active comparator).

Screen-positive women by HPV, VIA or AVE referred to colposcopy clinic and 5% of screen-negative women (negative on HPV, VIA, and AVE).

Cervical cancer triage and diagnostic tests among screen- positive women and screen negative women.

Biopsy-confirmed positive will receive necessary treatment by local standard of care.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

HPV Test

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The careHPV (QIAGEN, Gaithersburg, MD) test was developed in a public-private partnership specifically for use in low-resource settings. It is a simplified, robust, and affordable HPV test that does not distinguish specific HPV types; rather, it gives a positive result if any of 14 hrHPV types is present in the specimen. Electricity is necessary to run the test, but it does not need running water or air conditioning. In order to be most cost effective, the samples must be run with a full plate of 96 samples. Results take 3-4 hours to complete.

EVA System

Intervention Type DEVICE

Digital colposcope

Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (VIA)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

unaided visual inspection with acetic acid

Automated Visual Evaluation (AVE)

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Digital diagnostic classification, quality classifier using captured images from EVA System

Image Capture with Mobile Phone

Intervention Type OTHER

Compare performance of AVE installed on a mobile phone vs. on the EVA System

Pregnancy test

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Urine based pregnancy test

ScreenFire HPV test

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

ScreenFire HPV test (Atila BioSystems, Inc, Mountain View, CA) uses isothermal amplification to detect 13 high risk (hr)HPV types directly from clinical samples in approximately one hour. The test can be run on any real-time PCR machine and gives separate results for hrHPV types 16 and 18, as well as a pooled positive result for 13 other hrHPV types. The human cellular gene beta-globin is used as an internal control to measure sample adequacy. ScreenFire can be self-collected and does not require batching. AmpFire® obtained CE-mark in 2017.

Colposcopy with biopsy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A colposcopic exam with biopsy entails visual magnification of the cervix and the removal of a small piece of cervical tissue. After the application of acetic acid 5% onto the cervix, a device called a colposcope allows the clinician to visually identify changes consistent with HPV. Areas of the cervix where lesions appear (or if not, randomly selected sections) are then biopsied (small piece of sample removed) and an endocervical curettage is performed (removing a small section from the inside of the cervix). Tissue specimens are then sent to the lab for pathology diagnosis.

Thermal Ablation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Thermal ablation is utilized to treat high-grade cervical precancer. First, a speculum is introduced into the vagina to identify the cervix. Acetic acid 5% is applied to the cervix for one minute and the cervix is observed to look for changes consistent with precancer. If the cervix is able to be fully evaluated and there are no signs of invasive cancer, the tip of the device is heated to 100ºC and applied directly to the cervix for 1-2 minutes, which ablates or destroys the abnormal cells.

Loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

LEEP is utilized to remove abnormal tissue from the cervix. This may include tissue with precancerous cells (called cervical dysplasia) or cancerous cells. The loop is heated using electricity to remove the tissue. LEEP may also be called a loop excision or large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

HPV Test

The careHPV (QIAGEN, Gaithersburg, MD) test was developed in a public-private partnership specifically for use in low-resource settings. It is a simplified, robust, and affordable HPV test that does not distinguish specific HPV types; rather, it gives a positive result if any of 14 hrHPV types is present in the specimen. Electricity is necessary to run the test, but it does not need running water or air conditioning. In order to be most cost effective, the samples must be run with a full plate of 96 samples. Results take 3-4 hours to complete.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

EVA System

Digital colposcope

Intervention Type DEVICE

Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (VIA)

unaided visual inspection with acetic acid

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Automated Visual Evaluation (AVE)

Digital diagnostic classification, quality classifier using captured images from EVA System

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Image Capture with Mobile Phone

Compare performance of AVE installed on a mobile phone vs. on the EVA System

Intervention Type OTHER

Pregnancy test

Urine based pregnancy test

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

ScreenFire HPV test

ScreenFire HPV test (Atila BioSystems, Inc, Mountain View, CA) uses isothermal amplification to detect 13 high risk (hr)HPV types directly from clinical samples in approximately one hour. The test can be run on any real-time PCR machine and gives separate results for hrHPV types 16 and 18, as well as a pooled positive result for 13 other hrHPV types. The human cellular gene beta-globin is used as an internal control to measure sample adequacy. ScreenFire can be self-collected and does not require batching. AmpFire® obtained CE-mark in 2017.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Colposcopy with biopsy

A colposcopic exam with biopsy entails visual magnification of the cervix and the removal of a small piece of cervical tissue. After the application of acetic acid 5% onto the cervix, a device called a colposcope allows the clinician to visually identify changes consistent with HPV. Areas of the cervix where lesions appear (or if not, randomly selected sections) are then biopsied (small piece of sample removed) and an endocervical curettage is performed (removing a small section from the inside of the cervix). Tissue specimens are then sent to the lab for pathology diagnosis.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Thermal Ablation

Thermal ablation is utilized to treat high-grade cervical precancer. First, a speculum is introduced into the vagina to identify the cervix. Acetic acid 5% is applied to the cervix for one minute and the cervix is observed to look for changes consistent with precancer. If the cervix is able to be fully evaluated and there are no signs of invasive cancer, the tip of the device is heated to 100ºC and applied directly to the cervix for 1-2 minutes, which ablates or destroys the abnormal cells.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP)

LEEP is utilized to remove abnormal tissue from the cervix. This may include tissue with precancerous cells (called cervical dysplasia) or cancerous cells. The loop is heated using electricity to remove the tissue. LEEP may also be called a loop excision or large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

CINFinder

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women between 30 and 59 years of age

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy at the time of colposcopy/biopsy
* Hysterectomy with surgically absent cervix
* HPV test in the last 5 years independently of negative or positive result
* Previous cervical cancer diagnosis or treatment in the last 5 years
* Lack of willingness or capacity to provide informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

59 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Basic Health International

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

DL Analytics

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Karla Alfaro, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Basic Health International

David Levitz, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

DL Analytics

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ministerio de Salud

San Salvador, , El Salvador

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

El Salvador

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

David Levitz, PhD

Role: CONTACT

817-966-5600

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Karla Alfaro, MD

Role: primary

503-7854-7746

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rao DW, Bayer CJ, Liu G, Chikandiwa A, Sharma M, Hathaway CL, Tan N, Mugo N, Barnabas RV. Modelling cervical cancer elimination using single-visit screening and treatment strategies in the context of high HIV prevalence: estimates for KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. J Int AIDS Soc. 2022 Oct;25(10):e26021. doi: 10.1002/jia2.26021.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36225139 (View on PubMed)

Parham GP, Egemen D, Befano B, Mwanahamuntu MH, Rodriguez AC, Antani S, Chisele S, Munalula MK, Kaunga F, Musonda F, Malyangu E, Shibemba AL, de Sanjose S, Schiffman M, Sahasrabuddhe VV. Validation in Zambia of a cervical screening strategy including HPV genotyping and artificial intelligence (AI)-based automated visual evaluation. Infect Agent Cancer. 2023 Oct 16;18(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13027-023-00536-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37845724 (View on PubMed)

Hull R, Mbele M, Makhafola T, Hicks C, Wang SM, Reis RM, Mehrotra R, Mkhize-Kwitshana Z, Kibiki G, Bates DO, Dlamini Z. Cervical cancer in low and middle-income countries. Oncol Lett. 2020 Sep;20(3):2058-2074. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.11754. Epub 2020 Jun 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32782524 (View on PubMed)

Desai KT, Befano B, Xue Z, Kelly H, Campos NG, Egemen D, Gage JC, Rodriguez AC, Sahasrabuddhe V, Levitz D, Pearlman P, Jeronimo J, Antani S, Schiffman M, de Sanjose S. The development of "automated visual evaluation" for cervical cancer screening: The promise and challenges in adapting deep-learning for clinical testing: Interdisciplinary principles of automated visual evaluation in cervical screening. Int J Cancer. 2022 Mar 1;150(5):741-752. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33879. Epub 2021 Dec 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34800038 (View on PubMed)

Xue Z, Novetsky AP, Einstein MH, Marcus JZ, Befano B, Guo P, Demarco M, Wentzensen N, Long LR, Schiffman M, Antani S. A demonstration of automated visual evaluation of cervical images taken with a smartphone camera. Int J Cancer. 2020 Nov 1;147(9):2416-2423. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33029. Epub 2020 May 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32356305 (View on PubMed)

Ebrahimi N, Yousefi Z, Khosravi G, Malayeri FE, Golabi M, Askarzadeh M, Shams MH, Ghezelbash B, Eskandari N. Human papillomavirus vaccination in low- and middle-income countries: progression, barriers, and future prospective. Front Immunol. 2023 May 12;14:1150238. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1150238. eCollection 2023.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37261366 (View on PubMed)

Desai KT, Ajenifuja KO, Banjo A, Adepiti CA, Novetsky A, Sebag C, Einstein MH, Oyinloye T, Litwin TR, Horning M, Olanrewaju FO, Oripelaye MM, Afolabi E, Odujoko OO, Castle PE, Antani S, Wilson B, Hu L, Mehanian C, Demarco M, Gage JC, Xue Z, Long LR, Cheung L, Egemen D, Wentzensen N, Schiffman M. Design and feasibility of a novel program of cervical screening in Nigeria: self-sampled HPV testing paired with visual triage. Infect Agent Cancer. 2020 Oct 14;15:60. doi: 10.1186/s13027-020-00324-5. eCollection 2020.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33072178 (View on PubMed)

de Sanjose S, Perkins RB, Campos N, Inturrisi F, Egemen D, Befano B, Rodriguez AC, Jeronimo J, Cheung LC, Desai K, Han P, Novetsky AP, Ukwuani A, Marcus J, Ahmed SR, Wentzensen N, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Schiffman M; PAVE Study Group. Design of the HPV-automated visual evaluation (PAVE) study: Validating a novel cervical screening strategy. Elife. 2024 Jan 15;12:RP91469. doi: 10.7554/eLife.91469.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38224340 (View on PubMed)

Hu L, Bell D, Antani S, Xue Z, Yu K, Horning MP, Gachuhi N, Wilson B, Jaiswal MS, Befano B, Long LR, Herrero R, Einstein MH, Burk RD, Demarco M, Gage JC, Rodriguez AC, Wentzensen N, Schiffman M. An Observational Study of Deep Learning and Automated Evaluation of Cervical Images for Cancer Screening. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Sep 1;111(9):923-932. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy225.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30629194 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

4R44CA247137

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

4R44CA247137

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: org_study_id

View Link

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.