iMproving thE DIagnostics And Treatment Of ceRvical Precancer

NCT ID: NCT05870787

Last Updated: 2025-10-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

929 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-03-01

Study Completion Date

2024-12-13

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Cervical cancer screening is important as it enables identification of women at increased risk of the disease, but high-quality diagnostics of screen-positive women and effective treatment of those with precancer are critical in preventing progression to cancer. With the current transition from cytology-based to primary human papillomavirus (HPV)-screening and a growing proportion of HPV-vaccinated women, diagnostics of screen-positive women will become more challenging in the decades to come. Thus, there is a need to explore how to improve diagnostics while ensuring a low number of unnecessary procedures such as colposcopy and the collection of multiple cervical biopsies.

The overall purposes are:

Purpose 1: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of cervical precancer when using a colposcopic scoring system in the diagnostic work-up of screen-positive women.

Purpose 2: To investigate the performance of a colposcopic scoring system to identify women without cervical precancer in whom collection of biopsies can be safely omitted.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Introduction Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women worldwide. Every year, 375 women are diagnosed with cervical cancer in Denmark, and approximately 90 women die from the disease. Cervical cancer is caused by the sexually transmitted virus, human papillomavirus (HPV). When infected about 85-90 % clear the virus within a year or two. The remaining women develop a persistent HPV infection, which is associated with an increased risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), which may progress to cancer if left untreated. Cervical cancer can be prevented through prophylactic HPV vaccination and screening. In Denmark, women aged 23 - 64 years are invited to the screening program. Women who do not participate in regular screening have an increased risk of cervical cancer, however up to 55% of cervical cancers are diagnosed in women who have attended screening. Hence, the performance of diagnostics is crucial.

Diagnostics Women with abnormal screening results may undergo repeat testing or be referred for colposcopy. Colposcopy allows the colposcopist to magnify and visualize the cervix with the transformation zone, where cervical cancer and cervical lesions typically arise. The aim is to make a colposcopic diagnosis and select the most severe area for biopsies, which undergo histopathological examination. Studies have shown considerable inter- and intra-observer variability even among experienced colposcopists, and a variable sensitivity of colposcopy as low as 55-57%. These findings suggest a need to improve the detection rate of CIN2+. A validated colposcopic scoring system, the Swede score, has been designed to improve the detection of high-grade cervical lesions, specified as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) by providing an systematic approach to the colposcopy examination. The Swede score includes five variables (degree of 1) acetowhitening, 2) margins and surface, 3) vessels, 4) lesion size, and 5) iodine staining by using Lugols iodine) with a score from 0 - 2. Conventional colposcopy only utilizes acetic acid. In the original study, the Swede score had a high sensitivity and specificity for detecting high-grade cervical lesions (CIN2+), with an area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve of 0.87. Even so, the Swede score is endorsed by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO) and by the European Federation for Colposcopy (EFC), it has not yet been implemented in Denmark. As previous studies have mostly evaluated the use of the Swede score among expert colposcopists, it is important to assess whether the score may be a valuable tool among non-experts. In Denmark, colposcopy is mostly performed by non-experts gynecologists. As a result of the low performance of colposcopy, and because several studies have shown that the CIN2+ detection rate increases with the number of biopsies collected, the Danish national guidelines recommend that all women should have a minimum of 4 biopsies collected. Biopsies should be collected from abnormal areas of the cervix and, if no lesion is detected, random biopsies should be taken. Our neighboring Scandinavian countries, for example Sweden and Finland, do not recommend collection of random biopsies. If biopsies could be omitted without increasing the risk of missing disease and reducing the harms with pain, bleeding and discomfort, this would benefit the women.

Aim

The project aims to explore whether the implementation of a systematic colposcopic scoring system, the Swede score, can:

Pupose 1: Improve diagnostic accuracy of cervical lesions with detection of CIN2+ in a Danish clinical setting.

Purpose 2: Evaluate whether the Swede score can be used to assess cervical lesions with \<CIN1, so random biopsies can be safely omitted.

Data Characteristics of the women will be collected from medical records (previous gynecological historic, parity, smoking status, HPV-vaccination status, hormone use or immunosuppressive treatment). From the Danish Pathology Databank, we will collect data on previous screening history, result of the referral screening test, result of current and subsequent cervical biopsies and/or cervical excision.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cervical Dysplasia Cervical Disease Cervical Lesion Cervical Cancer Cervical Neoplasm

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Swede score colposcopy

Swede score colposcopy: includes application with acetic acid, supplemented with a systematic scoring system (the Swede score) including Lugols iodine, and collection of cervical biopsies.

Swede score colposcopy

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

New colposcopy method: with application of acetic acid, supplemented with a systematic scoringsystem (Swede score) including Lugols iodine, and collection of cervical biopsies.

Conventional colposcopy

Conventional colposcopy: includes application with acetic acid and collection of cervical biopsies.

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Swede score colposcopy

New colposcopy method: with application of acetic acid, supplemented with a systematic scoringsystem (Swede score) including Lugols iodine, and collection of cervical biopsies.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women referred to colposcopy due to abnormal smear (HPV-genotype and cytology) in Central Denmark Region or Southern Denmark Region.

Exclusion Criteria

* Allergic to iodine.
* Tranformationzone not visible (type 3).
* Atrophy of cervical epithelium.
* Women referred to colposcopy with no cervical biopsies taken or invalid cervical biopsies.
* Women with previous hysterectomy or without a cervix due to cervical cancer will be excluded.
* Pregnant women.
Minimum Eligible Age

23 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Aarhus

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Anne Hammer, MD, as.prof

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Aarhus

Ulrik Schiøler Kesmodel, MD, prof

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Aalborg University Hospital

Berit Bargum Booth, MD, Ph.d.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Randers Regional Hospital

Line Winther Gustafson, MD, Ph.d.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Aarhus University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Guldberg Kvindeklinik

Fredericia, Fredericia, Denmark

Site Status

Gødstrup Regional Hospital

Herning, Herning, Denmark

Site Status

Horsens Gynækologisk Klinik

Horsens, Horsens, Denmark

Site Status

Horsens Regional Hospital

Horsens, Horsens, Denmark

Site Status

Odense Univeristy Hospital

Odense, Odense, Denmark

Site Status

Randers Regional Hospital

Randers, Randers, Denmark

Site Status

Viborg Regional Hospital

Viborg, Viborg, Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Knudsen AS, Randrup TH, Kesmodel US, Booth B, Gustafson L, Trope A, Strander B, Nieminen P, Hammer A. Assessment of a colposcopic scoring system (Swedescore) to reduce the number of cervical biopsies: a protocol for a clinical multicentre non-randomised intervention study in Denmark. BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 15;14(12):e085382. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085382.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39675832 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2022-0367531-3031

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.