Evaluation of an Adjusted Cutoff Value for S.P.A.T (Skin Prick Automated Test) Device in Allergic Subjects

NCT ID: NCT06803953

Last Updated: 2025-01-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

75 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-09-17

Study Completion Date

2024-10-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Skin prick test (SPT) is a first line diagnostic test to detect type I hypersensitivity in patients suspected of an inhalant allergy. A novel S.P.A.T. or Skin Prick Automated Test device has been developed to enable more standardised allergy testing. In two independent studies, Gorris and colleagues previously showed that test results after S.P.A.T. are less variable and more consistent compared to conventional skin prick testing (Gorris et al. Allergy. 2023; Seys et al. Rhinology 2024). In these studies conducted in volunteers, a cutoff value of 4.5 mm has been proposed based on the 97.5 percentile level of glycerol control wheals.

The current study aims to determine a cutoff value corresponding to the highest accuracy to discriminate between sensitized-allergic and non sensitized, non allergic subjects for both house dust mite and birch allergens.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

House Dust Mite Allergy Birch Pollen Allergy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

HDM allergic patients

HDM allergic patients receive a nasal allergen provocation test with house dust mite allergens (der p and der f) to confirm the clinical relevance of the allergy.

All patients receive a conventional skin prick test on the one arm and an automated test on the other arm.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Skin Prick Automated Test

Intervention Type DEVICE

skin prick test to detection sensitisation to aeroallergens

Skin Prick Manual Test

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

skin prick test to detection sensitisation to aeroallergens

Nasal Allergen Challenge

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

nasal allergen challenge with either house dust mite allergens or birch pollen allergens

Birch pollen allergic patients

Birch pollen allergic patients receive a nasal allergen provocation test with birch allergen (bet v) to confirm the clinical relevance of the allergy.

All patients receive a conventional skin prick test on the one arm and an automated test on the other arm.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Skin Prick Automated Test

Intervention Type DEVICE

skin prick test to detection sensitisation to aeroallergens

Skin Prick Manual Test

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

skin prick test to detection sensitisation to aeroallergens

Nasal Allergen Challenge

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

nasal allergen challenge with either house dust mite allergens or birch pollen allergens

Non allergic patients

Non allergic patients did not receive a nasal allergen provocation test. All patients receive a conventional skin prick test on the one arm and an automated test on the other arm.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Skin Prick Automated Test

Intervention Type DEVICE

skin prick test to detection sensitisation to aeroallergens

Skin Prick Manual Test

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

skin prick test to detection sensitisation to aeroallergens

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Skin Prick Automated Test

skin prick test to detection sensitisation to aeroallergens

Intervention Type DEVICE

Skin Prick Manual Test

skin prick test to detection sensitisation to aeroallergens

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Nasal Allergen Challenge

nasal allergen challenge with either house dust mite allergens or birch pollen allergens

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Provide informed consent signed by study patient and investigator;
* Subjects with Health Social Identification Number;
* Allergic subjects with rhinitis with or without asthma and with or without conjunctivitis symptoms with proof of sensitisation to an inhalant allergy, either house dust mite ( Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus) or birch pollen by a positive skin prick test (SPT) with a wheal diameter ≥3 mm as compared to negative control. The clinical response against the culprit allergen will be assessed by a positive nasal allergen provocation test. (patients must not have clinical symptoms corresponding to both sensitization).
* Non-allergic subjects with proof of lack of sensitisation to any of the above referred allergens by a negative conventional skin prick test less than 2 years.
* Normal lung function as judged by investigator with FEV 1 and FEV 1/FVC ≥ 70% of predicted
* Willing and able to comply with clinic visits and study-related procedures;
* Able to understand and complete study-related questionnaires.

Exclusion Criteria

* Skin pathology like chronic or exuberant urticaria, dermographism, chronic dermatitis that needs daily treatment;
* Any skin abnormalities, which could negatively - in the opinion of the investigator - affect the test results, including large scars and tattoos on the forearm ;
* Patients with clinical symptoms corresponding to both sensitization to birch and house dust mite
* Use of antihistaminic medication \< 7 days before the start of the study;
* Use of tricyclic antidepressants (antihistamine activity) \< 7 days before the start of the study;
* Use of topical (on the forearm) or systemic corticoids \< 7 days before the start of the study;
* Use of any monoclonal antibodies such as omalizumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab \< 6 months before the start of the study;
* Use of oral systemic corticosteroids within 4 weeks prior to screening
* Use of intramuscular systemic corticosteroids within 3 months prior to screening
* Use of allergen immunotherapy for the allergen tested (\<2 y) or another inhalant allergen;
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding;
* Women without highly effective contraception (hormonal contraception, intrauterine device, bilateral tubal occlusion/ligation, vasectomized partner, sexual abstinence) at least one month prior to inclusion and during the study;
* Incapacitated subjects;
* Subjects who do not speak the local language (French);
* Subjects who cannot read or write.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Alyatec

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hippocreates

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Alina Gherasim, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Alyatec

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Alyatec

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HIP-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id