Investigation on the Prevalence and Etiology of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis in Nanchang Region
NCT ID: NCT06802653
Last Updated: 2025-05-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
400 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-07-28
2025-09-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis and Proprioceptive Defect
NCT04682379
Exploring Paraspinal Electromyographic Features in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients
NCT06456333
Efficacy of Physiotherapeutic Scoliosis Specific Exercises in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
NCT02968043
3D Imaging Assessment of Scoliosis: Back Height Difference vs. Trunk Rotation Angle
NCT06643104
Correlation Between the Cobb's Angle and the Forward Head Posture in Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
NCT06629948
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Scoliosis is thought to be associated with a variety of risk factors, including low BMI, gender differences, racial differences, asymmetrical backpack carrying, low physical activity, and prolonged screen viewing. However, despite the identification of many factors contributing to scoliosis, the comprehensive pathogenesis and natural progression of scoliosis are unknown.
Delaware pioneered school-based scoliosis screening in the 1960s, and it has since gradually spread throughout the United States, Canada, and Europe. Most studies have shown that early scoliosis screening is an effective way to prevent the progression of scoliosis in adolescents and reduce surgery rates. However, the implementation of mandatory scoliosis screening is controversial. Opponents of school-based scoliosis screening programs argue that, from a public health perspective, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis screening programs are not supported by sufficient evidence; from an economic perspective, school-based scoliosis screening requires a significant investment in human, material, and financial resources, and school-based scoliosis screening programs have not demonstrated significant cost-effectiveness.
The objectives of this study were to screen the prevalence of scoliosis among primary and secondary school students.
Study population Inclusion criteria: adolescents aged 9 to 14 years in primary and secondary schools.Exclusion criteria: congenital scoliosis, traumatic scoliosis, spinal tuberculosis, and other diseases caused by scoliosis.
Screening Methods In this study, 400 adolescents aged 9-12 years (from selected elementary schools) and 13-14 years (from middle schools) in Nanchang were screened. Prior to the assessment, basic information of the participants (including age, sex, height, weight, BMI, and medical history) was collected. Professional rehabilitation therapists evaluated the participants' posture and spinal rotation angles to determine the presence of scoliosis. Participants suspected of having scoliosis underwent further anteroposterior and lateral X-ray examinations for confirmation. Researchers collected data from the anteroposterior and lateral X-rays, including Cobb angle, Risser grade, Nash-Moe grade, and curve type. For participants diagnosed with scoliosis, additional parameters such as plantar pressure distribution, balance function, and respiratory function were collected.
① Plantar Pressure Measurement The specific procedure is as follows: The Footscan high-frequency plantar pressure distribution system (Belgium) was used. Participants stood barefoot on the pressure plate with their feet shoulder-width apart, looking at a target 1 meter ahead. Their arms hung naturally at their sides, and they breathed normally. After maintaining a stable posture for approximately 1 minute, the pressure sensor readings were recorded. Due to variations in height and body weight, the pressure data collected in this study were expressed as percentages of total plantar pressure. The selected parameters included total pressure on the left foot, total pressure on the right foot, forefoot pressure on both sides, and hindfoot pressure on both sides.
②Standard Posture Assessment
The specific procedure is as follows: The participant stood bareback with feet shoulder-width apart, eyes looking straight ahead, arms hanging naturally, and palms facing inward. The following were assessed:
1. Whether the shoulders were level;
2. Whether the scapulae were symmetrical;
3. Whether the inferior angles of the scapulae were at the same level;
4. Whether the lumbar concavities were symmetrical;
5. Whether the spinous process line was centered.
* Adams Forward Bend Test The specific procedure is as follows: The participant stood upright with knees straight and feet together, then slowly bent forward to approximately 90° with arms extended and palms joined, gradually placing the hands between the knees. During this process, the examiner observed whether the participant's back showed any asymmetry or unevenness.
* Angle of Trunk Rotation (ATR) Measurement A scoliometer was used to measure the degree of spinal rotation during the forward bend test. A reading greater than 5° was considered positive.
* Standing Anteroposterior X-ray of the Spine The specific procedure is as follows: For patients of normal build, the X-ray settings were typically 120 kV, 200 mA, and 1 second. All patients underwent standing anteroposterior X-rays with feet shoulder-width apart, knees naturally extended, facing the X-ray tube, and hands raised with palms forward. If the leg length discrepancy exceeded 2 cm, the shorter side was elevated to keep the pelvis level. The central axis of the X-ray beam was aligned as closely as possible with the sagittal midline of the spine. A measurement scale was placed appropriately. A Cobb angle greater than 10° was diagnostic of scoliosis.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
not provided
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Local residents of Nanchang, excluding students from special schools for children with physical or intellectual disabilities.
3. No underlying medical conditions, and able to complete all examinations without difficulty.
4. Willing to participate in the screening and having signed an informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Neurological or Psychiatric History: Individuals with a history of neurological or psychiatric disorders.
3. Refusal to Participate: Individuals who are unwilling or refuse to participate in the screening.
4. Severe Osteoporosis: Individuals diagnosed with severe osteoporosis.
9 Years
14 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Nanchang University Affiliated Rehabilitation Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Wentao Zeng
YING Liang
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Nanchang University Affiliated Rehabilitation Hospital
Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SFYLL-KY-PJ-2024-057
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.