Perineal and Abdominal Reconstruction: a Comparison of Reconstructive Methodologies
NCT ID: NCT06800534
Last Updated: 2025-01-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
50 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-06-21
2025-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Biological Mesh Repair of Complex Hernias in High Risk Patients
NCT01997619
Native Tissue Repair in Pelvic Organ Prolapse -Long-term Results and Risk of Re-operation
NCT06744972
Ventral Mesh Hernioplasty : Laparoscopic Versus Open Sublay
NCT06149858
Role of Mesh in Laparoscopic Sacropexy Surgical Techniques for the Treatment of Female Genital Prolapse
NCT06720831
Open and Endoscopic Technique in Female Inguinal Hernia Repair. FemaleHernia
NCT05863624
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The data recorded in the study are obtained from the medical records of patients who are normally accessed by the doctors of the operating unit during daily practice.
After having performed a meticulous collection of the basic data of the patients (gender, age, remote pathological history, recent pathological history, type of demolitive and reconstructive surgery performed), the different reconstructive methods (V-Y flap, lotus flap, gracilis muscle flap, TRAM flap) will be compared with the complications that occurred following the surgery, so as to define which reconstructive methods have led to fewer complications and in which categories of patients.
The complications are assessed through the retrospective analysis of the outpatient reports that are normally drawn up during the usual follow-up outpatient visits.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with complications in the abdominal or pelvic-perineal region of surgical relevance and requiring reconstruction (enteric fistulas, abdominal wall defects)
* Age greater than or equal to 18 years
* Acquisition of written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marco Pignatti, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
IRCCS AOU di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola
Bologna, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PLAST-GEN-1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.