Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-01-27
2026-12-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the correspondence at the item and total score level between the proposed self-report measure (CRPS Severity Score-Self Report; CSS-SR) and an existing validated measure of CRPS signs and symptoms derived from clinical history and physical examination data (CSS-Clinician version) and evaluate its diagnostic accuracy relative to clinically determined, criterion-based CRPS diagnosis using the Budapest criteria.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Autonomic Dysfunction and Spinal Cord Stimulation in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
NCT00780390
Infrared Images for Spinal Cord Stimulation in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Patients
NCT05777889
Closed Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
NCT06421350
The Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) is a Chronic Pain Condition. This is a Preliminary Study to Explore and Test Clinical Hypothesis. They Suppose That CRPS Patients Have Impairment in Their Mental or Motor Imagery Abilities.
NCT04703348
Comparison of Dorsal Column Stimulation to Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
NCT03794024
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
CRPS is considered an orphan condition by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and as such, acquiring adequate sample sizes for definitive clinical trials is challenging. One barrier to recruitment into CRPS research studies is the need to conduct in-person evaluations to screen for presence of current CRPS clinical features and determine CRPS diagnostic status. Unlike conditions such as chronic low back pain, which can be identified with high accuracy based on questions that can be administered remotely (i.e., pain intensity, location, frequency, and impact), diagnosing CRPS using the 2012 International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) criteria (i.e., the Budapest criteria) requires that a history and physical examination be conducted. This situation is similar to that formerly encountered in fibromyalgia studies prior to publication of the modified American College of Rheumatology 2010 criteria (i.e., diagnosis was based on clinical tender point evaluation), a barrier ultimately overcome by publication of the validated 2010 self-report diagnostic screening criteria that could be administered remotely.
Our collaborators developed a self-report measure suitable for remote delivery to assess CRPS-related symptoms. They evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of a self-report version of the CRPS Severity Score (CSS-SR) and assessed its validity relative to the original CSS based on clinician evaluation (CSS-Clinician) in 112 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In this study we will recruit patients with pain in an extremity at the outpatient chronic pain clinic at 75th street and will ask patients to complete the CSS-SR while the clinician evaluates the participant against the Budapest CRPS diagnosis criteria per usual care. Data (no identifiers) will be shared with our collaborator who will analyze and combine the findings from his TKA cohort with our outpatient chronic pain cohort to understand the external validity of the CSS-SR.
The proposed content of the self-report version of the CSS (CSS-SR) was rationally developed by creating lay language items designed to parallel the diagnostic symptoms assessed in the standardized clinician-obtained history that provides the basis for the symptom component of the CSS-Clinician. Thirteen questions in yes/no (presence/absence) checklist format assess presence of symptoms in the following areas: more prolonged or severe pain than expected, allodynia/hyperalgesia, skin temperature changes, skin color changes, edema, sweating changes, trophic changes (skin, hair, nails), tremor, dystonia, weakness, and range of motion limitations.
Scoring of the CSS-SR parallels scoring of the CSS-Clinician, with items coded as 1 for "Yes" and 0 for "No", with responses summed to create a total CSS-SR score potentially ranging from 0-13.
For the current validation study, CSS-SR items referred specifically to the "affected limb" to ensure that participants describe symptoms in the same body region as reflected in the assessment used to derive the CSS-Clinician.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CRPS group
Patients suspected or diagnosed with unilateral CRPS type I or II of the upper or lower extremity
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) Severity Score - Self Report
Self-report tool in a questionnaire format to capture CPRS Severity Score.
Non-CRPS group
Patients suspected or diagnosed with non-CRPS-related pain of the upper or lower extremities
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) Severity Score - Self Report
Self-report tool in a questionnaire format to capture CPRS Severity Score.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) Severity Score - Self Report
Self-report tool in a questionnaire format to capture CPRS Severity Score.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Suspected or diagnosed with unilateral CRPS type I or II of the upper or lower extremity
* Suspected or diagnosed with non-CRPS-related pain of the upper or lower extremities
Exclusion Criteria
* Total knee arthroplasty as the inciting event of CRPS
* Less than 18 years of age
* Non-English speaking
* Inability to comprehend study protocol and questionnaires
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Vanderbilt University
OTHER
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Alexandra Sideris, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital for Special Surgery
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wolfe F, Clauw DJ, Fitzcharles MA, Goldenberg DL, Hauser W, Katz RS, Mease P, Russell AS, Russell IJ, Winfield JB. Fibromyalgia criteria and severity scales for clinical and epidemiological studies: a modification of the ACR Preliminary Diagnostic Criteria for Fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol. 2011 Jun;38(6):1113-22. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.100594. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
Deyo RA, Dworkin SF, Amtmann D, Andersson G, Borenstein D, Carragee E, Carrino J, Chou R, Cook K, DeLitto A, Goertz C, Khalsa P, Loeser J, Mackey S, Panagis J, Rainville J, Tosteson T, Turk D, Von Korff M, Weiner DK. Report of the NIH Task Force on research standards for chronic low back pain. J Pain. 2014 Jun;15(6):569-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.03.005. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
Bruehl S. An update on the pathophysiology of complex regional pain syndrome. Anesthesiology. 2010 Sep;113(3):713-25. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181e3db38.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2024-1529
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.