Evaluation of Colonic Perfusion by Indocyanine Green Angiography During Colorectal Surgery

NCT ID: NCT06793280

Last Updated: 2025-03-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

562 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-05-06

Study Completion Date

2025-09-06

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Despite advancements in technology and improved surgical techniques, the occurrence of anastomotic leakage (AL) after colorectal surgery remains between 4% and 30%. AL is a feared complication associated with significant morbidity and mortality in colorectal surgery, with its causes being multifaceted. Inadequate blood supply to the intestines is believed to be a major contributor to its development. Various methods have been proposed to objectively assess intestinal perfusion beyond the subjective evaluation done by surgeons during surgery. However, these methods face challenges such as poor reproducibility and high costs, limiting their routine use. In recent years, indocyanine green (ICG) angiography has emerged as a tool for assessing organ perfusion in various medical scenarios. However, only one randomized clinical trial has been conducted regarding its use in evaluating colorectal surgery outcomes, which found that while ICG angiography sometimes led to additional bowel resection, it didn't significantly reduce the rate of anastomotic leaks compared to conventional methods. This could be due to the trial's small sample size, potentially reducing its statistical power. This study aims to investigate whether ICG angiography can lower the rate of anastomotic leaks during laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery, while also examining its impact on resection margins, perioperative morbidity, and mortality rates.

A total of 561 subjects undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery for malignancy, will be randomized in 2 arms: A Study Group undergoing ICG angiography (i.e. colonic perfusion is intraoperatively assessed by ICG angiography and level of resection is selected based on the fluorescence) and a Control Group (i.e. resection is performed based on subjective judgment).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anastomotic Leak

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

An interim analysis incoroporating a futility assessment is designed to assess whether this trial is likely to meet its objective before its completion
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ICG angiography

luorescence angiography is utilized to assess colonic resection margins and colorectal anastomosis, aiming to evaluate colonic blood flow. If the assessment indicates "insufficient" perfusion at the resection margin, the colon is resected once more to ensure satisfactory blood flow.

luorescence angiography is utilized to assess colonic resection margins and colorectal anastomosis, aiming to evaluate colonic blood flow. If the assessment indicates "insufficient" perfusion at the resection margin, the colon is resected once more to ensure satisfactory blood flow.

Colonic resection margins and colorectal anastomosis are intraoperatively assessed using fluorescence angiography to evaluate colonic perfusion. If perfusion at resection margin is considered "insufficient" the colon is resected again in order to obtain adequate perfusion.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

intraoperative ICG angiography

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Intraoperative ICG angiography to evaluate colonic perfusion

No ICG angiography

Subjective visual measures are employed by the surgeon in order to determine anastomotic perfusion.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

No intraoperative ICG angiography

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Visual evaluation of colonic perfusion

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

intraoperative ICG angiography

Intraoperative ICG angiography to evaluate colonic perfusion

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

No intraoperative ICG angiography

Visual evaluation of colonic perfusion

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age: 18-85 years
* Malignant colorectal tumors
* Elective surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* Abdomino-perineal resection
* Emergency procedures
* Conversion to open surgery
* No anastomosis
* Multifocal tumors
* Locally advanced cancer (T4)
* Distant metastases (M+)
* Major vasculopathies (previous PE, DVT, abdominal aorta surgery)
* ICG allergy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Nuovo Ospedale dei Castelli

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Roma La Sapienza

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Lidia Castagneto Gissey

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Lidia Castagneto Gissey

Roma, Italy, Italy

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Lidia Castagneto Gissey, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

3403497741

Giovanni Casella, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Lidia Castagneto Gissey

Role: primary

3403497741

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

6608

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.