Impact of Two Occlusal Schemes in Implant Retained Mandibular Overdenture on the Masticatory Efficiency

NCT ID: NCT06784050

Last Updated: 2025-01-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

12 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-09-22

Study Completion Date

2024-12-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Purpose: To assess the effect of two different occlusal schemes, bilateral balance and monoplane on the masticatory efficiency in mandibular implant retained overdenture with ball and socket attachment. Methodology: Twelve male completely edentulous patients were recruited for this clinical study. Each patient received two implants after that. Patients were divided randomly into two equal groups according to occlusal schemes which involved bilateral balanced occlusion and mono plane occlusion. each. Group 1 received a bilateral balanced occlusion scheme denture; Group 2 received monoplane occlusal scheme denture. Masticatory efficiencies were evaluated by assessing chewing time and number of chewing strokes with different types of foods. The data were collected, tabulated and statistically analyzed. Results: using dentures with bilateral balanced occlusion showed lower masticatory efficiency than the denture with monoplane occlusion with no significant difference when using soft food during the first month, while after 3 months there were significant differences between the two groups. Conclusion: The two-implant retained mandibular overdenture with monoplane occlusion showed relatively improved masticatory efficiency than with bilateral balanced occlusion.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Dental research has shown that implant-retained overdentures markedly improve the quality of life for edentulous patients \[1\]. Research has shown that two dental implants are sufficient to support a mandibular overdenture \[2\]. Considering the increasingly old age and systemic health complications of these patients, it is imperative that dental implant treatment include minimum intervention for both surgical and prosthetic maintenance after the delivery of the final prosthesis. This requires reducing the transmission of stress to the dental implants via the overdenture and its framework, hence assuring fewer maintenance procedures \[3\].

The attachment systems used in implant-retained overdentures may be categorized according to the splinting of the implants. The connection between the prosthesis and the implant is made using bar structures when dental implants are splinted. If the dental implants are not splinted, each implant is independently affixed to the prosthetic structure using technologies such as Locator, ERA, ball, O-ring, and different magnetic systems.\[1\] The choice of attachment type is influenced by the location of the dental implant, the required degree of retention, the morphology of the edentulous jaw, and the patient's motor dexterity. The preferred attachment types for overdentures are the Locator and ball systems due to their ease of application, minimal technical requirements, and lower costs compared to bar or magnet systems. There is ongoing research and development to improve attachment systems in dental implantology. \[2\] The occlusal scheme for overdentures affects the pattern of occlusal contact between opposing teeth during centric relation and mandibular functional movements. Consequently, the quantity and intensity of these contacts are crucial in determining the overall efficacy and comfort of the prosthesis. \[3\] The occlusal scheme known as fully bilateral balanced articulation is designed to ensure bilateral, simultaneous contact of the anterior and posterior denture teeth in both centric and eccentric positions. This scheme aims to achieve a cross-arch balanced articulation, promoting stability and functionality for the dentures during various mandibular movements.\[4\] On the other hand, the monoplane concept, first proposed by De Van in 1954, utilizes zero-degree teeth and creates a perfectly flat occlusal plane that is parallel to and evenly divides the upper and lower residual ridges. The occlusal plane is positioned at the junction of the upper and middle third of the retromolar pad. This approach eliminates inclined planes both in the tooth form and the occlusal plane, ensuring that no lateral components are generated with vertical chewing forces.\[5\] Masticatory performance refers to the ability to triturate food under controlled testing settings. \[9\] These food crushing tests are designed to evaluate the fragmentation of test specimens into smaller fragments. The test specimens may consist of natural food products, such as carrots or nuts, or synthetic materials like silicone-based Optosil cubes or fuchsin beads .\[6\] Masticatory efficiency is the primary indicator of mastication function and reflects the functional potential of the dental system, including dentures. Assessment the masticatory efficiency is vital for a comprehensive evaluation of treatment outcomes involving implant-retained overdentures.\[7\] Electromyographic devices are research equipment for evaluating the electrical activity of the muscles. The behavior of masticatory muscles and information as to the functional state of the stomatognathic neuromuscular system can be obtained by electromyography. It is a practical and efficient method for the study of muscle function and activity, thus serving as a valuable tool in dental research

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Edentulous Alveolar Ridge

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Bilateral Balanced Occlusion Group

This group received dentures designed with a bilateral balanced occlusion scheme. This occlusion scheme aims for simultaneous contact of teeth across the dental arch during jaw movements, purported to enhance stability and comfort.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bilateral Balanced Occlusion

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Dentures designed under this scheme feature a fully bilateral balanced articulation, ensuring bilateral, simultaneous contact of the anterior and posterior denture teeth in both centric and eccentric positions. This occlusal scheme is aimed at promoting stability and functionality of the dentures during various mandibular movements.

Monoplane Occlusion Group

This group received dentures designed with a monoplane occlusion scheme. This scheme involves a flat occlusal plane without curvature, intended to reduce the complexity of denture fabrication and potentially improve masticatory efficiency by simplifying the occlusal contacts

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Monoplane Occlusion

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

This scheme utilizes zero-degree teeth to create a flat occlusal plane, which is designed to simplify the occlusal contacts and minimize the transmission of lateral forces during mastication. The aim is to improve masticatory efficiency by reducing the complexity of tooth contact

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bilateral Balanced Occlusion

Dentures designed under this scheme feature a fully bilateral balanced articulation, ensuring bilateral, simultaneous contact of the anterior and posterior denture teeth in both centric and eccentric positions. This occlusal scheme is aimed at promoting stability and functionality of the dentures during various mandibular movements.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Monoplane Occlusion

This scheme utilizes zero-degree teeth to create a flat occlusal plane, which is designed to simplify the occlusal contacts and minimize the transmission of lateral forces during mastication. The aim is to improve masticatory efficiency by reducing the complexity of tooth contact

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Male patients Completely edentulous Ages range from 55-60 years Residual alveolar ridges of maxilla and mandible covered by healthy, firm, compressible mucosa Free from any temporomandibular joint disorders Have Angle's class I jaw relation Edentulous mandible for at least 6 months No bone augmentation requirement Good oral hygiene

Exclusion Criteria

Presence of any systemic conditions that could compromise implant surgery History of chemotherapy or radiotherapy to the head and neck region History of taking bisphosphonates Heavy smoker status
Minimum Eligible Age

55 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ain Shams University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Fatma ElSayed

assistant professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

outpatient clinic of the Prosthodontic Department, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Ahram Canadian University.

Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB00012891#133

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.