Minimally Invasive Procedure Versus Conservative Treatment in the Management of Calcaneal Joint Fractures
NCT ID: NCT06779305
Last Updated: 2025-01-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-01-16
2028-01-16
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparative Results of Conservatively and Surgically Treated Adolescents With Triplane and Juvenile Tillaux Ankle Fractures After Skeletal Maturity
NCT00541580
Primary Subtalar Arthrodesis Versus Late Subtalar Arthrodesis in Sanders Type IV Calcaneal Fractures
NCT05504304
Surgical vs Conservative Treatment of Displaced Intra-articular Calcaneal Fractures: A Prospective RCT
NCT01615744
Tibio-talo-calcaneal Fusion by Hindfoot Nail Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation in Treatment of Complex Fractures Distal Tibial and Fragility Ankle Fractures in Elderly
NCT06709365
Management of Closed Diaphyseal Displaced Leg Fractures in Children and Adolescents
NCT06503718
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Minimally invasive surgery group
Minimally invasive surgical application of CalcanailĀ®
The procedure involves making small incisions to insert a specialized nail into the bone to realign and stabilize the fracture. This approach minimizes damage to surrounding tissues, reduces the risk of wound complications, and allows for quicker recovery compared to traditional open surgery. after surgery, the patient will benefit from an immobilisation with a plaster boot without support for 3 weeks, followed by immobilisation with a removable walking boot for 3 weeks with partial support depending on the patient's pain.
Conservative treatment group
Immobilisation by cast boot
The patient will be immobilised in a plaster cast without support for 3 weeks, followed by immobilisation in a removable walking boot for 3 weeks with partial support depending on the pain.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Minimally invasive surgical application of CalcanailĀ®
The procedure involves making small incisions to insert a specialized nail into the bone to realign and stabilize the fracture. This approach minimizes damage to surrounding tissues, reduces the risk of wound complications, and allows for quicker recovery compared to traditional open surgery. after surgery, the patient will benefit from an immobilisation with a plaster boot without support for 3 weeks, followed by immobilisation with a removable walking boot for 3 weeks with partial support depending on the patient's pain.
Immobilisation by cast boot
The patient will be immobilised in a plaster cast without support for 3 weeks, followed by immobilisation in a removable walking boot for 3 weeks with partial support depending on the pain.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patient with a posterior articular fracture of the calcaneus Sanders II to IV, less than 15 days old
3. Patient affiliated to a social security scheme,
4. Patient having given written consent following written and oral information.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patient with bilateral calcaneal fracture
3. Patient with extreme varus or valgus impingement of the fibula
4. Patient with associated talar, tibial, femoral and/or pelvic fracture or associated spinal cord injury.
5. Patient unsuitable for loco-regional anaesthesia (LRA).
6. Patient with neuro-psychiatric disorders resulting in an inability to follow a post-surgical or post-immobilisation rehabilitation protocol.
7. Pregnant women
8. Patient protected by law under guardianship or curatorship, or unable to participate in a clinical study under article L. 1121-16 of the French Public Health Code.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
24-PP-14
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.