PECARN Versus NICE Guidelines for Pediatric Head Trauma in Emergency Department in Assuit and Sohag University Hospitals

NCT ID: NCT06768710

Last Updated: 2025-01-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

138 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-01-01

Study Completion Date

2026-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

the safety and validity of the PECARN with 100% sensitivity in both age groups in identifying patients with ciTBI and theoretically in reducing performed CT scans by 29%. Therefore, in patients classified in the low-risk category, it is a duty not to expose the child to ionizing radiation.

the NICE criteria can minimize the number of CT scans conducted while maintaining a fair sensitivity for identifying patients with TBI and those requiring neurosurgical intervention the sensitivity of the intracranial damage NICE criteria was 93% for early presenters.

This study is conducted to detect which guidelines can be followed to detect all intracranial lesions with minimizing the number of unnecessary CT scans.

the aim of the study is to evaluate safety and efficacy (sensitivity and specificity) of PECARN and NICE guidelines for detection of traumatic brain injury as compared to current clinical practice in emergency setting and Detection of intracranial findings on CT brain and detection of lesions that need neurosurgical intervention.

Significance of the study:

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Head trauma in children is one of the most common causes for emergency department (ED) visits. Most head trauma incidents in children visiting the ED are minor; however, identifying those patients who have clinically important traumatic brain injury (ciTBI) is challenging.

A cranial computed tomography (CT) scan is the standard diagnostic test and is widely used all over the world. Although cranial CT scans are useful for definitive diagnosis, potential cancer risks exist associated with ionizing radiation, particularly in children, who are more radiosensitive than adults.

Head trauma prediction rules have been derived for supporting phyiscians to improve accuracy in decision-making and to minimize the use of potentially harmful CT scans. The Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) developed two age-based head trauma prediction rules to identify children with very low risk of ciTBI who do not require cranial CT scans .

The PECARN rule was statistically derived to identify children at very low risk of ciTBI for whom a CT scan could safely be avoided based on the absence of predictor variables. In the presence of predictor variables, the algorithm stratifies the management of children into an intermediate-risk or high-risk group based on the risk of ciTBI. Children at high risk are recommended to have a CT scan as the risk of ciTBI outweighs the risks associated with radiation exposure.

NICE guideline: This guideline covers assessment and early management of head injury in infants, children, young people and adults. It aims to ensure that people have the right care for the severity of their head injury, including direct referral to specialist care if needed. This guideline has updated some of the terminology used in relation to safeguarding people under 16. according to algorithm 2 page8.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Head Trauma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

head trauma patients

patients less than 16 years old with head trauma indicated for CT brain according to current clinical practice

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients less than 16 years old with head trauma indicated for CT brain according to current clinical practice.

Exclusion Criteria

-Patients unstable to had a CT scan.
Maximum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sohag University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Noha Badran Abdelmawgoud

resident doctor at Emergency medicine, Sohag University

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Noha Badran Abdelmougod, resident doctor

Role: CONTACT

+201063409171

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PECARN vs NICE head trauma

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Knee Injury Decision
NCT02856945 UNKNOWN
The CDR Implementation Trial
NCT03162354 COMPLETED NA