Broad Validation Study of a Management Algorithm Mild Head Injury in Children

NCT ID: NCT02357186

Last Updated: 2018-12-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

7871 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-11-16

Study Completion Date

2018-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Head injury is a frequent reason for consultation with pediatric emergencies, over 95% are mild head injury defined by a Glasgow score greater than or equal to 13. In October 2009, the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network has published a rule clinical decision support of mild head injury of the child with the aim to identify children at very low risk for clinically severe intracranial lesions in order to avoid the use of CT and unnecessary exposure to radiation ionizing. This clinical decision rule constructed from a multicenter prospective cohort 42,412 American children allows on anamnestic and clinical elements to guide medical decision for conducting brain imaging, hospital monitoring or discharge home placing the child in three levels of risk of clinically severe intracranial lesions.

Since March 2012, the French Emergency Medicine Society recommends for the treatment of mild head trauma the child's use of the clinical decision rule provided that it is the subject of a validation study externally. Indeed, after the construction phase and before its daily application, a clinical decision rule must be subject to an broad validation process so that its predictive performance can be definitively established.

The investigators' work aims to conduct this broad validation study prospective multicenter way in a French pediatric population, as recommended by the French Emergency Medicine Society, in order to confirm or deny its predictive performance and allow its application and generalization. The investigators will check and if the Rule Clinical Decision is adapted or not to the management of mild head injuries in the French pediatric population.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Head Injury

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Mild head injury - clinical decision rule - Child

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Children under 16 years admitted to an emergency room for mild head injury (Glasgow Coma Scale score ≥14) in the previous 24 hours
* Children who have agreed to participate in the study (if age\> 8 years)
* Patient Parents have accepted the participation of their child in the study

Exclusion Criteria

* Children with bleeding disorders
* Ventricular shunt Presence
* Benin mechanism of trauma (fall of the height of the child or impact against an object while walking / running with no sign that the scalp dermabrasion)
* Penetrating trauma
* Known brain tumor
* Previously known neurological disorders
* Evaluation scanographic in another hospital before emergency review
Maximum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Nantes University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Fleur Lorton, Dr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Nantes University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Angers University Hospital

Angers, , France

Site Status

Brest University Hospital

Brest, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospiatlier Départemental de Vendée

La Roche-sur-Yon, , France

Site Status

Nantes University Hospital

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Poitiers University Hospital

Poitiers, , France

Site Status

Rennes University Hospital

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Saint-Nazaire Hospital

Saint-Nazaire, , France

Site Status

Toulouse University Hospital

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Tours University Hospital

Tours, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RC15_0038

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id