Exercise-Induced Hypoalgesia Differences Between Upper and Lower Limbs Resistance Training Interventions

NCT ID: NCT06765486

Last Updated: 2025-02-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-02-15

Study Completion Date

2025-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomized controlled trial with healthy subjects aims to compare exercise-induced hypoalgesia among three groups: one utilizing a lower limb resistance training intervention, another using an upper limb resistance training, and a control group. The exercise protocol involves 3 sets of 5 repetitions of resistance exercises (brachial biceps curl and leg extensions). Exercise-induced hypoalgesia will be assessed by measuring pressure pain thresholds in the thigh and elbow, comparing exercise interventions with the control group. Additionally, a secondary objective is to compare the lower limb and upper limb resistance training groups in terms of their effects on pressure pain thresholds in the thigh and elbow. Thus, the study anticipates observing differences in local and distal hypoalgesia based on the trained region.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Local Hypoalgesia Distal Hypoalgesia Resistance Training Pressure Pain Thresholds

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lower limb resistance training

The participants in the lower limb resistance training group will undergo 3 sets of 5 repetitions of leg extensions with the 5-resistance maximum (5RM), comprising a 5-minute warm-up in cycle ergometer at 1 watt per kg and 60-80 revolutions per minute and 1 set of 5 repetitions with the 10-resistance maximum (10RM).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lower limb resistance training

Intervention Type OTHER

Exercise intervention with leg extensions on the dominant quadriceps, doing 3 sets of 5 repetitions with the 5RM after a 5-minute warm-up with a cycle ergometer at 1 watt per kg and 60-80 revolutions per minute and 1 set of 5 repetitions with the 10RM. Previously, 72 hours before, the 5RM would have been calculated progressively approaching in sets of 5 repetitions, starting with the lower weight and stopping the test when obtaining an unsuccessful trial (the participant could not manage to lift the weight five times). The previous successful set would be established as the 5RM.

Upper limb resistance training

The participants in the upper limb resistance training group will undergo 3 sets of 5 repetitions of brachial biceps curl with the 5RM, comprising a 5-minute warm-up in cycle ergometer at 1 watt per kg and 60-80 revolutions per minute and 1 set of 5 repetitions with the 10RM.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Upper limb resistance training

Intervention Type OTHER

Exercise intervention with brachial biceps curl on the dominant brachial biceps, doing 3 sets of 5 repetitions with the 5RM after a 5-minute warm-up with a cycle ergometer at 1 watt per kg and 60-80 revolutions per minute and 1 set of 5 repetitions with the 10RM. Previously, 72 hours before, the 5RM would have been calculated progressively approaching in sets of 5 repetitions, starting with the lower weight and stopping the test when obtaining an unsuccessful trial (the participant could not manage to lift the weight five times). The previous successful set would be established as the 5RM.

Control

Participants in the control group will remain seated for the entire duration of the experiment without receiving any form of distraction.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lower limb resistance training

Exercise intervention with leg extensions on the dominant quadriceps, doing 3 sets of 5 repetitions with the 5RM after a 5-minute warm-up with a cycle ergometer at 1 watt per kg and 60-80 revolutions per minute and 1 set of 5 repetitions with the 10RM. Previously, 72 hours before, the 5RM would have been calculated progressively approaching in sets of 5 repetitions, starting with the lower weight and stopping the test when obtaining an unsuccessful trial (the participant could not manage to lift the weight five times). The previous successful set would be established as the 5RM.

Intervention Type OTHER

Upper limb resistance training

Exercise intervention with brachial biceps curl on the dominant brachial biceps, doing 3 sets of 5 repetitions with the 5RM after a 5-minute warm-up with a cycle ergometer at 1 watt per kg and 60-80 revolutions per minute and 1 set of 5 repetitions with the 10RM. Previously, 72 hours before, the 5RM would have been calculated progressively approaching in sets of 5 repetitions, starting with the lower weight and stopping the test when obtaining an unsuccessful trial (the participant could not manage to lift the weight five times). The previous successful set would be established as the 5RM.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Asymptomatic subjects aged between 18 and 64 years.

Exclusion Criteria

* Cardiovascular, respiratory, metabolic, neurological, or osteomuscular signs or pathologies.
* History of epilepsy.
* Pregnant.
* Participants who present any type of pain on the day of the measurements or who have frequently suffered pain during the previous 12 weeks.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

64 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centro Universitario La Salle

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Álvaro Reina Varona

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CSEU LaSalle

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Álvaro Reina-Varona, MSc

Role: CONTACT

(+34) 91 740 19 80 ext. 506

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Álvaro Reina-Varona, MSc

Role: primary

(+34) 91 740 19 80

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CSEULS-PI-013

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.