CORA-Q15: Continuous vs. Single-injection Interscalene Block on QoR-15 in Outpatient Rotator Cuff Surgery

NCT ID: NCT06754657

Last Updated: 2025-05-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-05-26

Study Completion Date

2027-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the study will be to compare the efficacy of single-injection interscalene block versus continuous interscalene block on the quality of recovery in patients undergoing outpatient arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery.

The participants will:

* Be randomized to receive either a single-injection interscalene block or continuous infusion via an elastomeric pump.
* Be monitored via telephone by the research team to complete the QoR-15 survey, assess pain levels, the need for tramadol use, and any complications.
* Have follow-up by the Acute Pain Unit during the first 3 days.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

After obtaining approval from the institutional CEC-CCSS and prospective registration of the study at clinicaltrials.org, the investigators will recruit patients who meet the inclusion criteria and provide written consent.

Following surgery and placement of the interscalene block with a catheter, in the recovery unit, participants will be assigned to one of two groups according to a random number table, in a 1:1 ratio using block randomization (block sizes of 4, 6, and 8) through sealed envelopes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Arthropathy Shoulder Pain, Acute Anesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized, blinded, two-group clinical trial with a two-stage analysis (non-inferiority followed by superiority, if applicable).
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators
Due to the nature of the intervention, both patients and healthcare personnel involved in the intraoperative and postoperative care of the patients will be blinded to the intervention.

The PCA button for administering rescue boluses will be stored inside an opaque bag, containing the pump and button, so it will not be available for initial use by the volunteers. The control group will have the infusion activated and the bolus button clamped, while the intervention group will have the infusion set to zero and the bolus button unclamped.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Infusion

Patients infusion rate will be set to 4 ml/h, with 5 ml boluses (30-minute lockout). The PCA button will be disabled for rescue bolus administration.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Single injection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

infusion rate 0 ml/h, with 5 ml boluses (30-minute lockout). The PCA button will be enabled for rescue bolus administration

Bolus

Patients infusion rate will be set to 0 ml/h, with 5 ml boluses (30-minute lockout). The PCA button will be enabled for rescue bolus administration.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Continuous perineural infusion

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

infusion rate 4 ml/h, with 5 ml boluses (30-minute lockout). The PCA button disabled

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Continuous perineural infusion

infusion rate 4 ml/h, with 5 ml boluses (30-minute lockout). The PCA button disabled

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Single injection

infusion rate 0 ml/h, with 5 ml boluses (30-minute lockout). The PCA button will be enabled for rescue bolus administration

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults (≥18 years, \< 75 years) scheduled for elective outpatient arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery.
* Patients capable of managing a continuous outpatient regional analgesia system based on an interscalene block (eligibility criteria: able to understand verbal and written instructions, have home support, and live geographically close to the healthcare center).
* Willing and able to provide informed, written consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* History of chronic opioid use (\>3 months).
* Severe comorbidities (e.g., renal or hepatic failure, ASA classification of 3 or higher).
* Allergy to local anesthetics, dexamethasone, or the analgesic drugs used in the study.
* Patients with contraindications for peripheral nerve block.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Red de Salud UC Christus

Santiago, , Chile

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Chile

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Fernando R Altermatt, MD

Role: CONTACT

56955049115 ext. 9115

Victor Contreras, MSN

Role: CONTACT

56223543414 ext. 3414

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Victor Contreras, MSN

Role: primary

56981895232

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Chou LB, Wagner D, Witten DM, Martinez-Diaz GJ, Brook NS, Toussaint M, Carroll IR. Postoperative pain following foot and ankle surgery: a prospective study. Foot Ankle Int. 2008 Nov;29(11):1063-8. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2008.1063.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19026197 (View on PubMed)

Joshi G, Gandhi K, Shah N, Gadsden J, Corman SL. Peripheral nerve blocks in the management of postoperative pain: challenges and opportunities. J Clin Anesth. 2016 Dec;35:524-529. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.08.041. Epub 2016 Oct 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27871587 (View on PubMed)

Neal JM, Gerancher JC, Hebl JR, Ilfeld BM, McCartney CJ, Franco CD, Hogan QH. Upper extremity regional anesthesia: essentials of our current understanding, 2008. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Mar-Apr;34(2):134-70. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31819624eb.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19282714 (View on PubMed)

Xu J, Chen XM, Ma CK, Wang XR. Peripheral nerve blocks for postoperative pain after major knee surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(12):CD010937. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010937.pub2. Epub 2014 Dec 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25501884 (View on PubMed)

Ilfeld BM, Vandenborne K, Duncan PW, Sessler DI, Enneking FK, Shuster JJ, Theriaque DW, Chmielewski TL, Spadoni EH, Wright TW. Ambulatory continuous interscalene nerve blocks decrease the time to discharge readiness after total shoulder arthroplasty: a randomized, triple-masked, placebo-controlled study. Anesthesiology. 2006 Nov;105(5):999-1007. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200611000-00022.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17065895 (View on PubMed)

Pehora C, Pearson AM, Kaushal A, Crawford MW, Johnston B. Dexamethasone as an adjuvant to peripheral nerve block. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 9;11(11):CD011770. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011770.pub2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29121400 (View on PubMed)

Lehmann N, Joshi GP, Dirkmann D, Weiss M, Gulur P, Peters J, Eikermann M. Development and longitudinal validation of the overall benefit of analgesia score: a simple multi-dimensional quality assessment instrument. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Oct;105(4):511-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq186. Epub 2010 Aug 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20693179 (View on PubMed)

Mascha EJ, Turan A. Joint hypothesis testing and gatekeeping procedures for studies with multiple endpoints. Anesth Analg. 2012 Jun;114(6):1304-17. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182504435. Epub 2012 May 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22556210 (View on PubMed)

Stark PA, Myles PS, Burke JA. Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-15. Anesthesiology. 2013 Jun;118(6):1332-40. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318289b84b.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23411725 (View on PubMed)

Chazapis M, Walker EM, Rooms MA, Kamming D, Moonesinghe SR. Measuring quality of recovery-15 after day case surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Feb;116(2):241-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev413.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26787793 (View on PubMed)

Myles PS, Myles DB. An Updated Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the QoR-15 Scale. Anesthesiology. 2021 Nov 1;135(5):934-935. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003977. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34543410 (View on PubMed)

Admiraal M, Smulders PSH, Rutten MVH, de Groot EK, Heine Y, Baumann HM, van der Vegt VHC, Halm JA, Hermanns H, Schepers T, Hollmann MW, Hermanides J, Ten Hoope W. The effectiveness of ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade on patient-reported overall benefit of analgesia in patients undergoing foot or ankle surgery (CAREFREE trial); a randomized, open label, non-inferiority trial. J Clin Anesth. 2024 Aug;95:111451. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111451. Epub 2024 Apr 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38574504 (View on PubMed)

Morales-Ariza V, Loaiza-Aldean Y, de Miguel M, Pena-Navarro M, Martinez-Silva O, Gonzalez-Tallada A, Manrique-Munoz S, de Nadal M. Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the postoperative quality of recovery 15 (QoR-15) questionnaire for Spanish-speaking patients: A prospective cohort study. Am J Surg. 2023 Apr;225(4):740-747. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.11.009. Epub 2022 Nov 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36414472 (View on PubMed)

Aliste J, Layera S, Bravo D, Aguilera G, Erpel H, Garcia A, Lizama M, Finlayson RJ, Tran D. Randomized comparison between perineural dexamethasone and combined perineural dexamethasone-dexmedetomidine for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2022 Jun 21:rapm-2022-103760. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2022-103760. Online ahead of print.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35728840 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

240829017

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Rotator Cuff Pathway
NCT03717753 COMPLETED NA