Modulation of Cortical Brain Activity During Attentional Control
NCT ID: NCT06748976
Last Updated: 2025-09-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
35 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-07-01
2025-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Does positive sham neurofeedback lead to a decrease in relative EEG alpha power compared to a control condition without feedback?
Researchers will compare the effects of positive and negative sham-neurofeedback conditions to a control condition without feedback to assess the system's impact on alpha rhythm modulation. Participants will:
Experience three conditions (positive sham-neurofeedback, negative sham-neurofeedback, and no feedback) within a virtual reality environment.
Undergo EEG recordings to measure changes in alpha power as a marker of attentional resource allocation.
Provide written informed consent and complete the study following ethical guidelines.
This study seeks to explore the potential of open-loop feedback systems to enhance attentional control by modulating alpha rhythm.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Electroencephalography Based Neurofeedback in Chronic Neuropathic Pain
NCT01560039
Reward Circuit Modulation Via fMRI-informed-EEG-based Musical Neurofeedback
NCT04876170
Study of Eye Movements as Markers of the Physiological, Cerebral and Cognitive State of Healthy Subjects
NCT04325971
Neurofeedback Removal of Emotional Information From Mind
NCT06460207
Toward a Generalizable Closed-loop Neurofeedback-based BCI for Attention Training
NCT05908253
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CROSSOVER
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Healthy
Volunteers: Adults aged 18-60 years with normal or corrected vision, no clinical history of photosensitive epilepsy, psychiatric disorders, significant hearing loss, migraines, or substance abuse.
Interventions:
Positive sham-neurofeedback Negative sham-neurofeedback Control (no feedback)
Positive sham neurofeedback
Participants receive simulated positive reinforcement feedback designed to mimic successful modulation of EEG alpha rhythms, despite the feedback not being directly based on their actual neural activity. This condition aims to create the perception of improved attentional control.
Negative sham neurofeedback
Participants receive simulated negative reinforcement feedback that mimics unsuccessful modulation of EEG alpha rhythms, regardless of their actual neural activity. This condition is intended to simulate reduced attentional control.
Control
Participants perform the same attentional task but without receiving any feedback. This condition serves as a baseline to evaluate the effects of the sham neurofeedback interventions on EEG alpha rhythm modulation.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Positive sham neurofeedback
Participants receive simulated positive reinforcement feedback designed to mimic successful modulation of EEG alpha rhythms, despite the feedback not being directly based on their actual neural activity. This condition aims to create the perception of improved attentional control.
Negative sham neurofeedback
Participants receive simulated negative reinforcement feedback that mimics unsuccessful modulation of EEG alpha rhythms, regardless of their actual neural activity. This condition is intended to simulate reduced attentional control.
Control
Participants perform the same attentional task but without receiving any feedback. This condition serves as a baseline to evaluate the effects of the sham neurofeedback interventions on EEG alpha rhythm modulation.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Normal or corrected vision.
* Ability to provide written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Significant hearing loss or diagnosed hearing impairment.
* Current psychiatric illness or disorder.
* History of migraines or chronic headaches.
* History of substance or alcohol abuse.
* Currently pregnant.
* Discomfort with using a virtual reality headset, assessed during a pilot session.
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Council of Scientific and Technical Research, Argentina
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
José Biurrun Manresa
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos
Oro Verde, Entre Ríos Province, Argentina
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Knowles MM, Wells A. Single Dose of the Attention Training Technique Increases Resting Alpha and Beta-Oscillations in Frontoparietal Brain Networks: A Randomized Controlled Comparison. Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 20;9:1768. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01768. eCollection 2018.
Magosso E, Ricci G, Ursino M. Modulation of brain alpha rhythm and heart rate variability by attention-related mechanisms. AIMS Neurosci. 2019 Mar 4;6(1):1-24. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2019.1.1. eCollection 2019.
Enriquez-Geppert S, Smit D, Pimenta MG, Arns M. Neurofeedback as a Treatment Intervention in ADHD: Current Evidence and Practice. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019 May 28;21(6):46. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1021-4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IS004817
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.