Validation of the STUMBL Score for Blunt Thoracic Trauma
NCT ID: NCT06734338
Last Updated: 2025-03-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
188 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-04-20
2025-07-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
How accurately does the STUMBL score predict mortality and critical outcomes such as ICU admission or advanced interventions? How well does the score stratify patients by injury severity in a resource-limited setting? Are there demographic or clinical factors that influence the score's predictive performance?
Participants will:
Be assessed using the STUMBL score upon arrival at the emergency department to predict risk levels.
Have demographic and clinical data, including age, gender, injury mechanism, comorbidities, and length of hospital stay, collected to explore potential associations with outcomes.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
STUMBL Score as a Risk Stratification Tool for Management of Blunt Chest Trauma Patients
NCT06316375
STUMBL vs TTSS in Predicting Morbidity and Mortality of Blunt Chest Trauma
NCT07270354
Emergency Management of Minor Blunt Thoracic Trauma
NCT02494232
Blunt Thoracic Trauma: Definition of a Standard Operating Procedure
NCT05617404
Under Water Seal Versus Negative Pleural Suction in Chest Trauma Patients
NCT04673084
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The STUMBL (STUdy of the Management of BLunt chest wall trauma) score was developed to assist in clinical decision-making for patients with blunt chest wall trauma. This model includes five risk factors: patient age, the number of rib fractures, chronic lung disease, pre-injury use of anticoagulants, and oxygen saturation levels. Unlike other scoring systems that focus solely on anatomical variables and age, the STUMBL score uniquely incorporates clinical variables such as chronic lung disease and anticoagulation. A huge benefit of the STUMBL score is that these variables are all routinely measured in the ED. The score has reached a sensitivity of 80%, a specificity of 96%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 93%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 86% for predicting complications following blunt chest wall trauma. By integrating essential clinical parameters, the STUMBL score helps clinicians identify patients at high risk for adverse outcomes. Each patient is evaluated based on several risk factors. A final risk score of ≥11 indicates a significant risk of developing complications, and a total risk score exceeding 25 is considered sufficiently high to require admission to the intensive care unit (ICU).
The STUMBL score has shown potential across various healthcare settings. However, its validation in varied populations, especially in low-resource areas, remains limited. In the context of Iraqi EDs, the applicability of the STUMBL score has not been thoroughly investigated. As healthcare systems face challenges related to resource, training, and infrastructure limitations, the integration of evidence-based tools like the STUMBL score could significantly improve patient care. The burden of trauma is compounded by ongoing conflict and limited healthcare resources, leading to an urgent need for effective trauma management protocols. This study aims to evaluate the performance of the STUMBL score among ED patients presenting with blunt thoracic trauma in Iraq.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients who present within 4 hours of sustaining the injury.
* Patients or their legal guardians must provide informed consent to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with other life-threatening injuries that overshadow the thoracic trauma (e.g., head or abdominal trauma).
* Pregnant women due to potential risks related to radiation or certain diagnostic procedures.
* Pediatric patients under 18 years of age.
* Patients with a history of major thoracic surgery (e.g., prior lung or heart surgery) that may interfere with the assessment of trauma severity.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Al-Nahrain University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Abdul-Ilah R. Khamis
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Yaser aamer Eisa Alhaibi, Assistant professor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
College Of Medicine - Nahrain University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
College of Medicine - Al-Nahrain University
Baghdad, , Iraq
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kelderman I, Dickhoff C, Bloemers FW, Zuidema WP. Very long-term effects of conservatively treated blunt thoracic trauma: A retrospective analysis. Injury. 2024 Apr;55(4):111460. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111460. Epub 2024 Mar 2.
Mistry RN, Moore JE. Management of blunt thoracic trauma. BJA Educ. 2022 Nov;22(11):432-439. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Oct 1. No abstract available.
Mukerji S, Tan E, May C, Micanovic C, Blakemore P, Phelps K, Melville H, Jones P. Retrospective validation of a risk stratification tool developed for the management of patients with blunt chest trauma (the STUMBL score). Emerg Med Australas. 2021 Oct;33(5):841-847. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13740. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
Callisto E, Costantino G, Tabner A, Kerslake D, Reed MJ. The clinical effectiveness of the STUMBL score for the management of ED patients with blunt chest trauma compared to clinical evaluation alone. Intern Emerg Med. 2022 Sep;17(6):1785-1793. doi: 10.1007/s11739-022-03001-0. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
Battle C, Cole E, Whelan R, Baker E. Scoping review of the literature to ascertain how the STUMBL Score clinical prediction model is used to manage patients with blunt chest wall trauma in emergency care. Injury. 2023 Jul;54(7):110796. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.05.027. Epub 2023 May 7.
Battle C, Cole E, Carter K, Baker E. Clinical prediction models for the management of blunt chest trauma in the emergency department: a systematic review. BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Oct 12;24(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01107-6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
012
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
UNCOMIRB20241212
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.