Thoracic Drains in Intensive Care Units: Comparison of Seldinger and Surgical Methods

NCT ID: NCT04438317

Last Updated: 2023-11-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

227 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-05-29

Study Completion Date

2023-06-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This prospective randomized multicenter study is intended to investigate tolerance and effectiveness of thoracic drainage conducted by Seldinger technique with small drains, or by a surgical-like technique with large armed drains, in intensive care units patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Drainage of pleural effusion and pneumothorax is a common feature in Resuscitation, Intensive Care Units (ICU) and Continuing Care Units (CCU). Although they are associated with a low incidence of complications (ranging from 0 to 8%), some of these can become fatal if they are associated with a visceral puncture (liver, spleen, lung parenchyma or heart by instance). It has been reported in the literature that complications were greater in case of drainage with large diameter drains set up by so-called "surgical-like" technique.

The choice of the type of chest tube is usually guided by the indication of drainage or the habits and / or experience of the practitioner. In the case of liquid pleural effusions, it may be preferable to use small diameter drains, whereas in the case of suspicious thick effusions such as empyema or blood, it may be preferable to use drainage drains of a larger diameter. However, results of retrospective analyzes seem to suggest the versatile and effective use of small-bore chest tubes in any of these indications without increasing complications' rates such as clogging.

However, no prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) has studied this issue to date. Therefore, the investigators propose to perform a multicenter RCT in ICU and CCU patients requiring pleural drainage for any indication or underlying disease.

This prospective RCT is intended to investigate tolerance and effectiveness of thoracic drainage conducted by Seldinger technique with small drains, or by a surgical-like technique with large armed drains. Furthermore, they want to estimate the respective costs, identify the difficulties related to both strategies, recognize associated practices (ultrasound-guidance, implantation site, operator's competence), and finally point out the secondary determinants of tolerance and effectiveness.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pleural Effusion Pneumothorax Hemothorax

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

* Prospective clinical trial, randomized, controlled, open-label
* Two parallel groups, comparing two strategy involving different medical devices
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Since the study is based on two different techniques, the masking of participants, care providers and local investigator is impossible.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Seldinger Technique

Small bore chest tubes inserted by Seldinger technique. A needle is inserted into the intercostal space, and the aspiration of a fluid allows the confirmation the correct position, possibly after ultrasound tracking. A metal guidewire is inserted through the needle, which is then removed. A dilator is then inserted on the metal guidewire to dilate the skin and the subcutaneous tissues. The chest tube is finally inserted on the guide, which is finally removed, and the chest tube is connected to the aspiration system after fixation to the chest wall.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Pleural drainage procedure with Seldinger procedure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Pleural drainage using Seldinger technique.

Surgical-like Technique

Large bore chest tube inserted by surgical-like technique. Progressive chest wall dissection is conducted with appropriate instruments (scissors, scalpel, clamps…) by a non-surgeon physician. Large bore drain with rigid introductor is blindly inserted in the pleural cavity, secured to the chest wall with suture fixation and further connection to the aspiration system.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Pleural drainage procedure with surgical-like technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Pleural drainage using Surgical-like technique.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pleural drainage procedure with Seldinger procedure

Pleural drainage using Seldinger technique.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Pleural drainage procedure with surgical-like technique

Pleural drainage using Surgical-like technique.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Of-age patient (\>18years)
* Patient admitted in ICU or CCU
* Patient requiring a pleural drainage, semi-urgent or planned
* Patient with a social security insurance

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient under guardianship
* Severe or uncompensated bleeding disorders
* Thoracic trauma at the acute phase (\<6 hours)
* Compressive pneumothorax requiring immediate and urgent needle exsufflation
* No thoracic drainage (whatever the technique used) performed previously during the same stay in ICU or CCU.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DrainICU - RBHP 2019 GODET 2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Driving Pressure in Trauma
NCT03367442 COMPLETED
Thoracentesis QI Study
NCT05424120 COMPLETED NA