Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Saline Irrigation as an Add-On Therapy for Retained Pleural Infections [LYTICS +]

NCT ID: NCT06713382

Last Updated: 2025-05-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

96 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-04-10

Study Completion Date

2026-12-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this protocol is to conduct a pilot prospective non-blind clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel saline irrigation technique as an adjunct to standard interventions for treating retained pleural infections. Intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy (IPFT) is commonly used for infections not adequately managed with antibiotics and intercostal tube drainage, while saline irrigation serves as an alternative for cases with a high bleeding risk where IPFT is not feasible. The efficacy of saline irrigation combined with IPFT remains unexplored. The hypothesis is that saline irrigation could be an effective and safe addition to IPFT for patients with persistent pleural infections.

The specific aims of the study include:

Determine the efficacy of saline irrigation as add-on therapy to IPFT: Compare the clinical outcomes of patients receiving saline irrigation combined with IPFT to those receiving IPFT alone to determine if the addition of saline irrigation offers significant benefits. Outcomes include changes in inflammatory markers, imaging characteristics (echography and CT), volume of pleural fluid drained, chest tube duration, hospital length of stay, and the need for subsequent surgical intervention.

Assess the safety and tolerability of saline irrigation plus IPFT: Compare complications and patient comfort in those receiving saline irrigation combined with IPFT to those receiving IPFT alone.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Objective:

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pleural saline irrigation as an adjunct therapy in patients with retained pleural infection, comparing it with the standard of care (antibiotics, chest tube placement, and lytics).

Study Design:

This is a prospective, two-arm pilot trial to be conducted at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. The study will involve two groups: one receiving standard care and the other receiving pleural saline irrigation in addition to standard care. Patients will be assigned to one of the two study arms (standard care vs. standard care + saline irrigation) using block randomization to ensure balanced group sizes.

Interventions:

Control Group (Standard Care):

Patients will receive the current standard of care, which includes antibiotics, chest tube placement, and intrapleural tPA/DNase therapy based on the criteria outlined above.

Intervention Group (Standard Care + Saline Irrigation):

In addition to the standard care, patients in this group will receive pleural saline irrigation through the chest tube immediately after IPFT. The amount of saline will be determined by free-flow saline infusion up to 250 mL. This maneuver will be repeated each time IPFT is administered, based on the treating physician's criteria.

Outcomes:

Primary Endpoint:

The primary outcome is the reduction in pleural effusion volume, measured with CT (volumetry) and US (Balik formula), with efficacy defined as a 10% or greater improvement compared to standard care alone. Success will be determined by a ≥10% additional reduction in pleural effusion volume compared to regular interventions.

Secondary Endpoints:

Rate of pleural infection resolution based on clinical (fever), radiographic (ultrasound and CT signs of complicated pleural effusion), and laboratory (inflammatory markers) data.

Chest tube duration. Duration of hospital stay. Complications related to the interventions. Pain associated with the interventions. Need for surgery. Overall mortality.

Data Collection and Variables:

A range of variables will be collected to assess both primary and secondary outcomes. Primary outcome measures will focus on the percentage reduction in pleural effusion volume, assessed through chest ultrasound or CT scan at baseline and during follow-up. Secondary outcomes include adverse events related to the intervention, such as hypothermia, chest discomfort, and fluid overload. The incidence of pleural infection-related complications, recurrence of infection, and the need for further pleural interventions, such as thoracentesis or chest tube placement, will be monitored. Chest tube duration, fever duration, leukocytosis, neutrophil count, and blood culture results will be evaluated to track infection resolution and patient recovery.

Subgroup analysis will be performed based on pleural fluid volume and characteristics (pH, glucose, LDH), antibiotic duration, and follow-up imaging results, both at the end of therapy and 3-6 weeks later. Other intervention-related variables, such as the amount and frequency of saline irrigation, chest tube size, intrapleural tPA/DNase doses, and the total volume of fluid drained, will also be collected to further assess the intervention's efficacy and safety.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pleural Effusion Associated With Pulmonary Infection Pleural Effusion Disorder Pleural Effusions

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

\- Control Group (Standard Care):

Patients will receive the current standard of care, which includes antibiotics, chest tube placement, and intrapleural tPA/DNase therapy based on the criteria outlined above.

\- Intervention Group (Standard Care + Saline Irrigation):

In addition to the standard care, patients in this group will receive pleural saline irrigation through the chest tube immediately after IPFT. The amount of saline will be determined by free-flow saline infusion up to 250 mL. This maneuver will be repeated every time that IPFT is administered, based on treating physician's criteria
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard of care

Patients will receive the current standard of care, which includes antibiotics, chest tube placement, and intrapleural tPA/DNase therapy based on their clinical criteria

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Standard Care + Saline Irrigation

In addition to the standard care, patients in this group will receive pleural saline irrigation through the chest tube immediately after IPFT. The amount of saline will be determined by free-flow saline infusion up to 250 mL. This maneuver will be repeated every time that IPFT is administered, based on treating physician's criteria

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Pleural Saline Irrigation

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

This intervention, Pleural Saline Irrigation, involves the administration of up to 250 mL of sterile saline solution into the pleural cavity through a chest tube immediately following each intrapleural tPA/DNase (IPFT) therapy session. The saline irrigation is intended to aid in clearing infected pleural fluid and reducing pleural effusion volume. This maneuver is repeated based on the treating physician's criteria, differentiating it from standard care, which includes only antibiotics, chest tube placement, and IPFT without saline irrigation. The irrigation is expected to enhance infection resolution and may impact chest tube duration and the frequency of pleural interventions.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pleural Saline Irrigation

This intervention, Pleural Saline Irrigation, involves the administration of up to 250 mL of sterile saline solution into the pleural cavity through a chest tube immediately following each intrapleural tPA/DNase (IPFT) therapy session. The saline irrigation is intended to aid in clearing infected pleural fluid and reducing pleural effusion volume. This maneuver is repeated based on the treating physician's criteria, differentiating it from standard care, which includes only antibiotics, chest tube placement, and IPFT without saline irrigation. The irrigation is expected to enhance infection resolution and may impact chest tube duration and the frequency of pleural interventions.

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥18 years.
* Presence of purulent pleural fluid or pleural fluid analysis with any of the following:
* pH ≤ 7.2.
* Glucose \< 40 mg/dL.
* LDH \> 1000 IU/L.
* Presence of bacterial or fungal organisms on Gram stain or culture.
* Chest tube placement with less than 200 mL drainage in 24 hours.
* Indication for IPFT treatment based on treating physician's criteria.
* Radiographic evidence of septations on chest ultrasound (US) or loculations on low-dose chest computed tomography (CT).

Exclusion Criteria

* Inability to provide informed consent.
* Pregnant patients.
* Patients with significant comorbidities that may interfere with the study -outcomes (e.g., terminal malignancy).
* Complicated sympathetic effusion.
* Hepatic hydrothorax.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Adnan Majid, MD

Medical Doctor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Adnan Majid, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Adnan Majid, MD

Role: CONTACT

6179016430

Maria C Lopez, MD

Role: CONTACT

7869678448

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Adnan Majid, MD

Role: primary

6179016430

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

LYTICS+

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Management of Pleural Space Infections
NCT03873766 COMPLETED PHASE4
The ACES Study for Aseptic Pleural Effusion
NCT06210685 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Fungal Empyema Thoracis
NCT07337993 RECRUITING NA