Evaluating MIONM Effectiveness in Predicting Postoperative Neurological Deficits Using Combined Modalities

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-02-01

Study Completion Date

2024-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Objective: This study aimed to integrate findings from spinal and cranial surgeries with existing literature, emphasizing the role of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring (IONM) in improving surgical outcomes through best practices.

Methodology: Multimodal IONM, including motor evoked potential (MEP), somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP), and electromyography (EMG), was utilized in surgeries at Duke University Hospitals. Challenges included a small sample size and limited access to medical records.

Findings:

Effectiveness of IONM: High sensitivity (97.73%), specificity (83.33%), and predictive value of multimodal IONM confirmed its role in detecting intraoperative neurological injuries and optimizing outcomes.

Demographics: Analysis of 50 cases (58% male, aged 13-67 years) revealed demographic influences on surgical challenges and outcomes.

IONM Alerts: A 50% reduction in MEP/SSEP amplitudes was a critical criterion, with reversible alerts accounting for 70%, emphasizing the dynamic nature of neural responses.

Alert Causes \& Management: Excessive dissection was a common cause of alerts. Interventions like warm saline irrigation and surgical pauses mitigated risks.

Outcome Associations: Most patients (88%) experienced no new postoperative deficits, with significant associations between alert reversibility and deficit occurrence.

Statistical Insights:

Predictive Value: Strong correlations were observed between alert patterns and postoperative outcomes, with SSEP/MEP alerts reliably predicting neurological deficits.

Technology \& Resources: Modern devices, updated technology, and skilled staff were critical for high-quality results, highlighting the adage that "poor monitoring is worse than no monitoring."

Contextual Observations:

Heterogeneity of Cases: Diagnoses ranged from cervical intramedullary tumors to lumbar canal stenosis, requiring tailored interventions.

EMG Utility: EMG showed stability with fewer alerts, proving beneficial in specific surgeries.

Corrective Measures: Adjustments in mean arterial blood pressure and steroid use showcased adaptive intraoperative strategies.

Protocol Gaps: The absence of standardized IONM alert response protocols was noted, underscoring the need for future research.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Evaluation Of Intra-Operative Neuro-Monitoring Alarm During Complex Spine Surgery

NCT05710016

Spine Injuries and Disorders

UNKNOWN

Intraoperative Monitoring (IOM) Patient Registry

NCT02187653

Intraoperative Monitoring Spinal Diseases

UNKNOWN

The Impact of ESP on Neurophysiological Monitoring in Scoliotic Patients

NCT05632016

Neurophysiological Monitoring Under TIVA

UNKNOWN NA

A Novel Repetitive Synchronized Associative Stimulation Neuromodulation Approach for Spinal Cord Injury Patients

NCT06494059

SCI - Spinal Cord Injury

RECRUITING NA

EMG and SSEP Device (EPAD® 2.0) for Intraoperative Monitoring of Patient Undergoing Spinal Nerve Spine Surgery

NCT03848377

Spine Disease Neurological Disorder

UNKNOWN

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Detailed Description:

The discussion emphasizes the importance of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) in enhancing surgical safety during spinal and cranial procedures. Multimodal IONM (MIONM), incorporating somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP), motor evoked potentials (MEP), and electromyography (EMG), serves as a critical tool for real-time neurological monitoring during these complex operations.

MIONM is highlighted for its ability to detect intraoperative neurological changes, enabling timely interventions. Factors such as patient demographics and case heterogeneity, including diverse diagnoses like craniotomy, lumbar canal stenosis, scoliosis, and cervical intramedullary tumors, underscore the need for tailored surgical approaches. The integration of modern equipment and experienced personnel ensures the delivery of high-quality monitoring results.

The discussion also explores the challenges in managing IONM alerts, including causes like over-dissection, hypoperfusion, and excessive cord manipulation. A multimodal approach to handling alerts includes interventions such as positional adjustments, warm saline irrigation, and optimizing blood flow. The absence of standardized protocols for responding to alerts highlights the need for future research to develop evidence-based guidelines.

Further research is encouraged to refine IONM methodologies, customize surgical strategies based on patient-specific factors, and establish standardized alert response protocols to optimize outcomes in spinal and cranial surgeries.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spine Condition

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

The interventional study in my work , titled "The Usefulness of Multimodal Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring During Brain or Spine Surgeries," employs a single-group, prospective observational design to evaluate the efficacy of Multimodal Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring (MIONM) in preventing postoperative neurological deficits. Below are the key elements of the study model:

Interventional Study Model :

Design:

Type: Interventional, Prospective Observational Single Group Assignment: All participants undergo the same intervention using MIONM during their neurosurgical procedures.

No Control Group: The outcomes of MIONM use are directly compared with expected standards of care based on existing literature

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Multimodal Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring (MIONM) Arm

This arm involves the application of Multimodal Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring (MIONM) during neurosurgical procedures. Participants in this arm undergo continuous intraoperative monitoring using a combination of:

Somatosensory Evoked Potentials (SSEP): Monitoring sensory pathway integrity. Motor Evoked Potentials (MEP): Assessing motor pathway functionality. Electromyography (EMG): Detecting nerve irritation and monitoring cranial and limb muscles.

The intervention is designed to enhance surgical precision by providing real-time feedback to the surgical team, aiming to prevent postoperative neurological deficits and improve patient outcomes. Pre- and postoperative clinical assessments are conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of MIONM.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Multimodal Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring (MIONM)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Multimodal Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring (MIONM) is a real-time, device-based intervention used during neurosurgical procedures to monitor and preserve the integrity of neural pathways. It combines the following modalities:

Somatosensory Evoked Potentials (SSEP): Monitors sensory pathways by stimulating peripheral nerves and recording cortical responses.

Motor Evoked Potentials (MEP): Assesses motor pathways via transcranial stimulation and muscle response evaluation.

Electromyography (EMG): Detects nerve irritation and monitors muscle activity during surgery.

This intervention provides critical real-time feedback to the surgical team, enabling immediate adjustments to prevent neurological damage and enhance surgical outcomes. The Cascade IOMAX system is the primary device used in this study for implementing MIONM.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Multimodal Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring (MIONM)

Multimodal Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring (MIONM) is a real-time, device-based intervention used during neurosurgical procedures to monitor and preserve the integrity of neural pathways. It combines the following modalities:

Somatosensory Evoked Potentials (SSEP): Monitors sensory pathways by stimulating peripheral nerves and recording cortical responses.

Motor Evoked Potentials (MEP): Assesses motor pathways via transcranial stimulation and muscle response evaluation.

Electromyography (EMG): Detects nerve irritation and monitors muscle activity during surgery.

This intervention provides critical real-time feedback to the surgical team, enabling immediate adjustments to prevent neurological damage and enhance surgical outcomes. The Cascade IOMAX system is the primary device used in this study for implementing MIONM.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age \> 12 years.
2. Various brain or spinal pathologies that are indicated for (IONM) such as (cerebellopontine angle tumors, scoliosis, epidural abscesses, arteriovenous malformations, canal stenosis, tumor resection, and craniotomies.
3. Medically fit for surgery.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Unobtainable or poor baselines (both MEPs and SSEPs).
2. Patients with a motor power grade of 1 or below.
3. Presence of vascular clips, intracranial electrodes, pacemakers, other implanted biomechanical equipment, cortical lesions, skull defects, increased intracranial pressure, and history of epilepsy.

Minimum Eligible Age

12 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No