Italian Adaptation and Validation of Functional and Behavioural Scales for Subjective Cognitive Decline, Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Dementia.

NCT ID: NCT06701630

Last Updated: 2025-02-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

390 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-11-26

Study Completion Date

2026-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The first aim of the observational study is the translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of functional and behavioral scales used in the diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases, for which a formal version in Italian is not available at present. In particular, the study includes the following functional and behavioral scales: the Katz's index (Basic Activities of Daily Living, BADL), the Lawton and Brody's scale (Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, IADL), the Everyday Cognition questionnaire (E-Cog), the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q) for assessing the Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia. Furthermore, a modified Italian version of the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ), which integrates and updates the content of the original items (e.g., addressing the use of technologies, M-FAQ) will be used in the validation study.

The second aim is to evaluate the psychometric properties of the M-FAQ, the ECog, and the NPI-Q in terms of reliability and validity.

The third aim is to apply a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to identify cut-offs of IADL, M-FAQ and ECOG to discriminate between different clinical groups (i.e., neurologically unimpaired elderly; Subjective Cognitive Decline, SCD; Mild Cognitive Impairment, MCI; mild Alzheimer's Disease, AD).

Neurologically unimpaired elderly participants (over 60 years old) and participants with SCD, MCI, mild AD, and their caregivers/informants will undergo: i) administration of the translated versions of the scales; ii) administration of a Cognitive Reserve questionnaire. For SCD, MCI and AD participants, data from the clinical neuropsychological evaluation will also be collected, while paper-and-pencil psychometric tests to assess global cognitive functioning (Mini Mental State Examination) and logical-abstract reasoning (Raven's Colored Matrices) will be administered to the neurologically unimpaired participants.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background Increasing aging in high-income countries, linked to increased life expectancy and declining birth rates, is accompanied by an exponential increase of dementia.

While the use of psychometric cognitive tests validated in different clinical populations is commonly used in clinical practice, there is a relative lack of validated Italian-language tools to assess functional autonomy abilities and detect the presence of neuropsychiatric symptoms, even though these are essential aspects for diagnostic, prognostic, and preventive purposes.

The assessment of functional indepedence is particularly important in the diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), where the presence of substantially intact or minimally impaired functional abilities is not easy to operationalize and measure, although it has significant relevance especially in the differential diagnosis with overt mild dementia. Currently, the functional scales most used in clinical settings are the Basic Activities of Daily Living scale (BADL), the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scale (IADL) and the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ). However, the Italian versions of these tools are informal. The group of Farias and colleagues (2008) has more recently developed a new assessment tool, the Everyday Cognition questionnaire (ECog), with a focus on functional changes in specific cognitive domains (memory, language, visuospatial skills, and executive functions).

The Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) is one of the most widely used tools for assessing the Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (BPSD) in research, covering a wide range of neuropsychiatric symptoms. In 2000, a questionnaire form was published, the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q), which is more suitable for use in routine clinical practice and has been validated in several countries, but not in Italian.

Study design According to a power analysis, 300 neurologically unimpaired elderly participants and 90 participants, divided into Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD), Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and mild Alzheimer's Disease (AD), will participate in the study.

Inclusion criteria:

For all groups: i) Age ≥ 60 years; ii) Availability of an informant/caregiver, able to judge their functional abilities.

For neurologically unimpaired elderly: i) Normal performance on the Mini Mental State Examination.

For clinical groups: conditions consistent with:

* Subjective Cognitive Decline;
* Mild Cognitive Impairment;
* Mild Major Neurocognitive Disorder. Exclusion criteria
* Other neurological or psychiatric conditions that may explain the presence of cognitive difficulties and refusal or inability to sign informed consent.

Methods Participants and their caregivers/informants will undergo: i) Detailed information of the purpose and modalities of the study, verification of eligibility criteria, signing of informed consent; ii) Collection of demographic and anamnestic data; iii) Administration of the translated versions of the functional rating scales and NPI-q; iiii) Administration of a Cognitive Reserve questionnaire (e.g., Cognitive Reserve Index questionnaire).

For SCD, MCI and AD participants, data from the neuropsychological evaluation clinically performed will also be collected.

Two paper-and-pencil psychometric tests will be administered to neurologically unimpaired participants, to assess global cognitive functioning (Mini Mental State Examination) and logical-abstract reasoning (Raven's Colored Matrices).

Each functional scale will be administered both in the self-report version, in which the participant will provide responses relative to his or her own functioning, and in the informant version, in which the informant or caregiver will be asked to give a rating to his or her relative or friend's functioning in daily activities. The NPI-Q will be administered only to the informant.

Socio-demographic information (age, gender, manual laterality, education, and cognitive reserve assessed through specific questionnaires, e.g., CRI-Q) will be collected from all participants.

A pilot version of each translated scale will be administered, as a semi-structured interview, to about 20 participants and their informants, in order to obtain a final version for each tool to be used in the validation study.

Statistical analysis The distribution of the responses provided by the four clinical groups to the different items of the functional scales (ADL, IADL, M-FAQ and ECog) and the NPI-Q questionnaire will be analyzed to detect the presence of any ceiling and floor effects. The degree of agreement between the self-administered version and the informant version in each tool will be assessed. Cronbach's Alpha coefficient will be employed to analyze the internal consistency of ECOG, M-FAQ and NPI-Q. Convergent validity between functional scales will be calculated.

A confirmatory factor analysis will be employed to examine the factorial structure of the ECog compared to the original version.

Discriminant validity will be assessed by comparing M-FAQ and ECOG by the four scores in different clinical groups through logistic regression models.

Finally, a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis will finally be applied to identify cut-offs of IADL, M-FAQ, and ECOG to discriminate among the different clinical groups.

Expected results Italian versions of functional and behavioral scales will be obtained, according to a rigorous cross-cultural adaptation procedure, and overcoming divergences between the available Italian informal versions.

The study will also make available a modified version of the Functional Activities Questionnaire (M-FAQ) that integrates and updates the original items.

Pre-clinical and clinical validation of the tools included in the study will improve early diagnosis and longitudinal monitoring overtime.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neurologically Unimpaired Elderly Participants Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) Major Neurocognitive Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Neurologically unimpaired participants

i) Age ≥ 60 years; ii) Availability of an informant/caregiver, able to judge their functional abilities; iii) Normal performance on the Mini Mental State Examination (Folstein et al. 1975; Foderaro et al., 2022).

No interventions assigned to this group

Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD)

i) Age ≥ 60 years; ii) Availability of an informant/caregiver, able to judge their functional abilities.

iii) Conditions consistent with Subjective Cognitive Decline according to Jessen et al. (2014)

No interventions assigned to this group

Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)

i) Age ≥ 60 years; ii) Availability of an informant/caregiver, able to judge their functional abilities.

iii) Conditions consistent with Mild Cognitive Impairment according to Winblad et al. (2004)

No interventions assigned to this group

Major Neurocognitive Disorder

i) Age ≥ 60 years; ii) Availability of an informant/caregiver, able to judge their functional abilities iii) Conditions consistent with a Mild Major Neurocognitive Disorder according to DSM-5-TR (APA, 2022).

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥ 60 years;
* Availability of an informant/caregiver, able to judge their functional abilities.

For neurologically unimpaired elderly:

\- Normal performance on the Mini Mental State Examination (Folstein et al. 1975; Foderaro et al., 2022).

For clinical groups: Conditions consistent with:

* Subjective Cognitive Decline (Jessen et al., 2014)
* Mild Cognitive Impairment (Winblad et al., 2004)
* Mild Major Neurocognitive Disorder according (DSM-5-TR, APA, 2022).

Exclusion Criteria

* Refusal or inability to sign informed consent;
* For the clinical groups: other neurological or psychiatric conditions that may explain the presence of cognitive difficulties.
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Casa di Cura IGEA

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sabrina Guzzetti

Psychologist, principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sabrina Guzzetti

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Casa di Cura IGEA, Milan, Italy

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Casa di Cura Igea

Milan, Michigan, Italy

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Sabrina Guzzetti, Psychologist

Role: CONTACT

+390248593315

Laura Veronelli, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+390264483704

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Sabrina Guzzetti, PsyD

Role: primary

+3948593315

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Foderaro G, Isella V, Mazzone A, Biglia E, Di Gangi M, Pasotti F, Sansotera F, Grobberio M, Raimondi V, Mapelli C, Ferri F, Impagnatiello V, Ferrarese C, Appollonio IM. Brand new norms for a good old test: Northern Italy normative study of MiniMental State Examination. Neurol Sci. 2022 May;43(5):3053-3063. doi: 10.1007/s10072-021-05845-4. Epub 2022 Jan 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34989910 (View on PubMed)

Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-91. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11124735 (View on PubMed)

American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Winblad B, Palmer K, Kivipelto M, Jelic V, Fratiglioni L, Wahlund LO, Nordberg A, Backman L, Albert M, Almkvist O, Arai H, Basun H, Blennow K, de Leon M, DeCarli C, Erkinjuntti T, Giacobini E, Graff C, Hardy J, Jack C, Jorm A, Ritchie K, van Duijn C, Visser P, Petersen RC. Mild cognitive impairment--beyond controversies, towards a consensus: report of the International Working Group on Mild Cognitive Impairment. J Intern Med. 2004 Sep;256(3):240-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01380.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15324367 (View on PubMed)

Kaufer DI, Cummings JL, Ketchel P, Smith V, MacMillan A, Shelley T, Lopez OL, DeKosky ST. Validation of the NPI-Q, a brief clinical form of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2000 Spring;12(2):233-9. doi: 10.1176/jnp.12.2.233.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11001602 (View on PubMed)

KATZ S, FORD AB, MOSKOWITZ RW, JACKSON BA, JAFFE MW. STUDIES OF ILLNESS IN THE AGED. THE INDEX OF ADL: A STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF BIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL FUNCTION. JAMA. 1963 Sep 21;185:914-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.1963.03060120024016. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14044222 (View on PubMed)

Cummings JL. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: assessing psychopathology in dementia patients. Neurology. 1997 May;48(5 Suppl 6):S10-6. doi: 10.1212/wnl.48.5_suppl_6.10s.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9153155 (View on PubMed)

Pfeffer RI, Kurosaki TT, Harrah CH Jr, Chance JM, Filos S. Measurement of functional activities in older adults in the community. J Gerontol. 1982 May;37(3):323-9. doi: 10.1093/geronj/37.3.323.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7069156 (View on PubMed)

McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, Hyman BT, Jack CR Jr, Kawas CH, Klunk WE, Koroshetz WJ, Manly JJ, Mayeux R, Mohs RC, Morris JC, Rossor MN, Scheltens P, Carrillo MC, Thies B, Weintraub S, Phelps CH. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011 May;7(3):263-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005. Epub 2011 Apr 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21514250 (View on PubMed)

Jessen F, Amariglio RE, van Boxtel M, Breteler M, Ceccaldi M, Chetelat G, Dubois B, Dufouil C, Ellis KA, van der Flier WM, Glodzik L, van Harten AC, de Leon MJ, McHugh P, Mielke MM, Molinuevo JL, Mosconi L, Osorio RS, Perrotin A, Petersen RC, Rabin LA, Rami L, Reisberg B, Rentz DM, Sachdev PS, de la Sayette V, Saykin AJ, Scheltens P, Shulman MB, Slavin MJ, Sperling RA, Stewart R, Uspenskaya O, Vellas B, Visser PJ, Wagner M; Subjective Cognitive Decline Initiative (SCD-I) Working Group. A conceptual framework for research on subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2014 Nov;10(6):844-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.01.001. Epub 2014 May 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24798886 (View on PubMed)

Nucci M, Mapelli D, Mondini S. Cognitive Reserve Index questionnaire (CRIq): a new instrument for measuring cognitive reserve. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2012 Jun;24(3):218-26. doi: 10.3275/7800. Epub 2011 Jun 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21691143 (View on PubMed)

Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969 Autumn;9(3):179-86. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 5349366 (View on PubMed)

Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1202204 (View on PubMed)

Farias ST, Mungas D, Reed BR, Cahn-Weiner D, Jagust W, Baynes K, Decarli C. The measurement of everyday cognition (ECog): scale development and psychometric properties. Neuropsychology. 2008 Jul;22(4):531-44. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.22.4.531.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18590364 (View on PubMed)

Carlesimo GA, Caltagirone C, Gainotti G. The Mental Deterioration Battery: normative data, diagnostic reliability and qualitative analyses of cognitive impairment. The Group for the Standardization of the Mental Deterioration Battery. Eur Neurol. 1996;36(6):378-84. doi: 10.1159/000117297.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8954307 (View on PubMed)

Albert MS, DeKosky ST, Dickson D, Dubois B, Feldman HH, Fox NC, Gamst A, Holtzman DM, Jagust WJ, Petersen RC, Snyder PJ, Carrillo MC, Thies B, Phelps CH. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011 May;7(3):270-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.008. Epub 2011 Apr 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21514249 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

4920_11.09.2024_P_bis

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.