Irinotecan Liposomes +5-FU/LV Versus Capecitabine in Patients of Recurrence After Resection of Resectable BTC

NCT ID: NCT06699459

Last Updated: 2024-11-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

76 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-11-14

Study Completion Date

2026-11-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Irinotecan liposome combined with 5-FU/LV has shown good efficacy and has certain advantages in reducing the adverse reactions of conventional chemotherapy drugs. Adjuvant treatment of high-risk factors after surgery for biliary tract tumors can be further explored and attempted. Therefore, this study intends to conduct an exploratory study comparing oral capecitabine with irinotecan liposome +5-FU/LV for adjuvant therapy in high-risk patients after resection of resectable biliary malignancies, and evaluate the effectiveness and safety of irinotecan liposome +5-FU/LV as adjuvant therapy for high-risk patients after resection of resectable biliary malignancies. So it can provide more treatment options for patients with postoperative adjuvant therapy of biliary tract malignant tumor.

The DFS rate one year after surgery for biliary malignancy was assumed to be 51.4% with a maximum response rate of poor efficacy and 71.4% with a minimum response rate of good efficacy. A two-stage design was adopted with α=0.05 and certainty (1-β) =0.8, and Minimax was adopted. If a response occurs in 7 out of 14 patients or less, treatment options are rejected; In the second phase, if 24 or fewer responses occur in 38 patients, the protocol is rejected. A total of 38 samples were designed in two stages. The 1-year DFS rate was at least 65.8% in the total population of the test and control groups.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

According to the 2023 CSCO guidelines, differentiated surgical treatment has been performed for the site of biliary malignancies. For postoperative adjuvant therapy, BILCAP study showed that oral capecitabine as a single drug is one of the options for both efficacy and safety. For patients with postoperative risk factors, serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and CA19-9 are of some significance for monitoring recurrence, and often serve as precursors for clinical judgment of recurrence or progression. For people with high risk factors for recurrence and progression, adjuvant therapy intensity needs to be strengthened. Oral capecitabine can no longer meet the needs of this population, so patients need to be given intravenous chemotherapy in advance to control progression, recurrence or metastasis. In this case, metastatic first-line therapy is often used for early intervention. The NIFE study showed that compared with conventional chemotherapy regimens, the regimen of irinotecan liposome (new formulation) combined with 5-FU/LV achieved relatively better efficacy data in the median OS and ORR efficacy. It is noteworthy that this regimen has a significant therapeutic benefit in patients with advanced first-line extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, with a median PFS of 9.59 months and a median OS of 18.23 months.

To explore the efficacy and safety of irinotecan liposomes +5-FU/LV versus oral capecitabine in patients at high risk of recurrence after resection of resectable biliary malignancies.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Biliary Tract Carcinoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Irinotecan liposome

* Irinotecan liposomes: 70mg/m2, intravenous infusion, Q2W, d1; ②LV: 400mg/m2, intravenous infusion, Q2W, d1; ③5-FU: 2400 mg/m2, continuous intravenous infusion, Q2W, d1-2;

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Irinotecan Liposome

Intervention Type DRUG

②LV: 400mg/m2, intravenous infusion, Q2W, d1; ③5-FU: 2400 mg/m2, continuous intravenous infusion, Q2W, d1-2;

Capecitabine

Capecitabine, 1250mg/m2 oral, bid, Q3W, d1-14;

Group Type OTHER

Capecitabine

Intervention Type DRUG

① Capecitabine, 1250mg/m2 orally, bid, Q3W, d1-14;

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Irinotecan Liposome

②LV: 400mg/m2, intravenous infusion, Q2W, d1; ③5-FU: 2400 mg/m2, continuous intravenous infusion, Q2W, d1-2;

Intervention Type DRUG

Capecitabine

① Capecitabine, 1250mg/m2 orally, bid, Q3W, d1-14;

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Irinotecan Liposome+LV/5-FU

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18-75 years old.
* Patients with histologically confirmed, resectable biliary malignancies with R0 resection.
* Postoperative pathology indicated the following risk factors: positive lymph nodes, vascular invasion, nerve invasion and so on.
* Has not received systemic chemotherapy before.
* The ECOG score is 0 to 1.
* Bone marrow and organ function were good: ① Neutrophils (ANC) ≥1.5×109/L, platelets (PLT) ≥100×109/L, hemoglobin (Hb) ≥90g/L, white blood cells (WBC) ≥3.0×109/L, albumin (ALB) ≥32 g/L, and no bleeding tendency; ② Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≤2.5× upper limit of normal range (ULN), ≤5×ULN with liver metastasis; Total bilirubin ≤1.5×ULN; Serum creatinine (Cr) ≤1.5×ULN or creatinine clearance ≥60 mL/min (calculated according to Cockroft-Gault).
* Expected survival ≥3 months.
* Volunteer to participate in the study and sign the informed consent. If the subject does not have the ability to read the informed consent (e.g., illiterate subjects), a witness must witness the informed process and sign the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients allergic to the investigational drug and its excipients.
* Known or suspected central nervous system or lymphatic metastasis.
* Cannot discontinue use or has not discontinued use of CYP3A, CYP2C8, and UGT1A1 potent depressants or inducers (e.g., anticonvulsants \[phenytoin, phenobarbital, or carbamazepine\] within 2 weeks prior to enrollment), rifampicin, rifambutin, St.John's Wort, Grapefruit juice, clarithromycin, Itraconazole, Lopinavir, Nefazodone, Nelfinavir, Ritonavir, Saquinavir, Terrapivir, voriconazole, Azanavir, Gefilozil, Indinavir, etc.).
* There are signs and symptoms of intestinal obstruction.
* Other malignancies within the past 5 years or currently, except for cured cervical carcinoma in situ, uterine carcinoma in situ, and non-melanoma skin cancers.
* Autoimmune disease or long-term steroid use.
* Patients who are pregnant or nursing women, and patients who refuse to receive contraception during their reproductive age.
* Patients deemed unsuitable for participation in this study.
* Vulnerable groups, including people with mental illness, cognitive impairment, critically ill patients, etc.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zhejiang Cancer Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

RenJi Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fujian Provincial Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ningbo No. 1 Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Shaoxing People's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Southern Medical University, China

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mingyu Chen, Ph.D

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Fujian Provincial Hospital

Fuzhou, Fujian, China

Site Status

The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Site Status

Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status

Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status

Zhejiang Cancer Hospital

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Site Status

Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital , affiliated with the Zhejiang University School of Medicine

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Mingyu Chen, Ph.D

Role: CONTACT

0086-18757772223

Ruijing Shen, Master

Role: CONTACT

0086-17706431287

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Shi Chen

Role: primary

Wei Chen

Role: primary

Maolang Li, Ph.D

Role: primary

Xiangsong Wu

Role: primary

Yuhua Zhang, Ph.D

Role: primary

Mingyu Chen, Ph.D

Role: primary

0086-18757772223

Ruijing Shen, Master

Role: backup

0086-17706431287

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SRRSH.20240559

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.