A Phase I Study of Adjuvant Chemotherapy With GS in Biliary Tract Cancer Undergoing Resection Without Major Hepatectomy

NCT ID: NCT01713387

Last Updated: 2017-10-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Total Enrollment

38 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-04-30

Study Completion Date

2017-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To decide maximum tolerated dose and recommended dose of treatment using gemcitabine plus S-1 combination therapy in patients with biliary tract cancer undergoing resection without major hepatectomy

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Surgery currently remains the only potentially curative treatment for biliary tract cancer (BTC), and most patients develop recurrence. Therefore, effective adjuvant chemotherapy is required to increase the curability of surgery and to prolong the survival in these patients. However, to date, no standard adjuvant chemotherapy has been established, and a guideline for BTC treatment recommends that trials of adjuvant chemotherapy be carried out.

Recently, there are two reports about gemcitabine (GEM) + S-1 combination (GS)chemotherapy after surgical resection for patients with BTC. At Iwate Medical University, Takahara, et al., performed a phase I study using a regimen of repeating 28 days as 1 course. Patients received GEM on day 1 and day 15, and S-1 from day 1 to day 14. The recommended dose is 1,000 mg/m² of GEM and S-1 80 mg/m² after a pancreatoduodenectomy. The 2-year survival rate of the 34 patients that received the GS therapy was 78.6% (Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2012 May;69(5):1127-33). At Hiroshima University, a cycle of chemotherapy consisted of intravenous GEM of 700 mg/m² on day 1 and oral S-1 of 50 mg/m² for 7 consecutive days, followed by a 1-week break from chemotherapy (14days as 1 course). Fifty patients received GS therapy and had a significantly better 3-year survival rate (57%) compared with 53 cases of surgery alone (30%). The GS adjuvant chemotherapy was feasible and the adverse event was minimal (Ann Surg. 2009 Dec;250(6):950-6).

Thus, the regimens of these two studies were 14 or 28 days as 1 course. There was no regimen that consisted of GEM on day 1, 8 and S-1 for 14 consecutive days, followed by a 1-week break from chemotherapy (21days as 1 course), which is frequently used for unresectable BTC and pancreatic cancer.

Though a hepatectomy is frequently performed during surgery for BTC, it is unclear if the effect of the anticancer agent is affected by a hepatectomy. Because GEM is metabolized by cytidine deaminase primarily in the liver, the ability to metabolize GEM after a hepatectomy is thought to decrease. Some clinical studies demonstrated that patients who had undergone a hepatectomy could not tolerate the standard dose and schedule of GEM. For adjuvant chemotherapy with GEM, it is necessary to separately examine whether or not the patient has undergone a hepatectomy.

Considering these present conditions, we aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of GEM + S-1 combination chemotherapy (21days as 1 course regimen, which is frequently used for unresectable BTC) for BTC with the patients undergoing curative resection without a hepatectomy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Biliary Tract Cancer

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

adjuvant chemotherapy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

gemcitabine , S-1

Level-2 Gem 800mg/msq, S-1 50mg/msq Level-1 Gem 800mg/msq, S-1 65mg/msq Level 1 Gem 1000mg/msq, S-1 65mg/msq Level 2 Gem 800mg/msq, S-1 80mg/msq

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Gemcitabine, S-1

Intervention Type DRUG

Dose of gemcitabine and S-1 and treatment schedule

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Gemcitabine, S-1

Dose of gemcitabine and S-1 and treatment schedule

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Gemcitabine;gemzer , S-1;TS-1

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Biliary tract cancer (BTC) with more than stage IB
2. BTC undergoing R0 or R1 resection without major hepatectomy
3. Older than 20 years old
4. PS 0 or 1
5. No treatment other than surgery
6. No dysfunction of main organs
7. Possible oral intake
8. Treatment start; after 4 weeks and within 12 weeks after surgery
9. Obtained written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with resection of major hepatectomy
2. Patients with double cancers
3. Patients having severe allergy
4. Patients with severe organ dysfunction
5. Patients with active infectious disease
6. Pregnancy
7. Patients with severe psychological disease
8. Patients seem inadequate for this study by investigators
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kansai Hepatobiliary Oncology Group

NETWORK

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hideyoshi Toyokawa, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Kansai Medical University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kansai Medical University

Hirakata, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Japan

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UMIN000007454

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

KHBO1202

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id