Continuous Glucose Monitoring Using a New Subcutaneous Insulin Protocol for Mild to Moderate Diabetic Ketoacidosis

NCT ID: NCT06693115

Last Updated: 2025-06-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-01-31

Study Completion Date

2026-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Using a prospective, mixed methods study design, the investigators will assess the feasibility, usefulness, and care team acceptability of CGM in conjunction with FSBG during implementation of the new subQ DKA/HHS protocol at Regions Hospital. This will include evaluating how many patients agree to have a CGM device placed, time to place the CGM devices, CGM impact on length of stay, level of care required, frequency of alerts to changing glucose levels events, and assessing the match between CGM and FSBG readings done in the inpatient setting. Results will help inform cost effective, safe, patient-centered strategies, while gauging care team satisfaction to optimize DKA and HHS management in the future.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and Hyperosmolar Hyperglycemic State (HHS) are severe complications of diabetes mellitus and one of the most common causes of hospital admission among people with diabetes. Up to now, the standard of care for managing DKA and HHS at Regions Hospital has involved intravenous (IV) insulin to treat hyperglycemia. However, the use of IV insulin is associated with increased care team resource utilization and the potential for adverse events such as hypoglycemia. Regions Hospital is in the process of implementing a new subcutaneous (subQ) insulin protocol, which has the potential to reduce resource utilization and improve patient safety, while producing similar outcomes for patients. One critical part of the new protocol is reducing the frequency of point of care capillary blood glucose monitoring, commonly known as a Finger Stick Blood Glucose test (FSBG) from hourly (Q1) to every 4 hours (Q4). The use of subQ insulin with less frequent blood sugar monitoring is possible owing to subQ insulin's slower mechanism of action than the IV insulin. Protocols have been shown to be safe within other hospital systems. However, the change from Q1 to Q4 monitoring of blood sugars does lead to some concern on the part of providers about correcting hyperglycemia too slowly or failing to recognize impending hypoglycemic events.

The use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) technology has been proposed to provide continuous (i.e. every 5 mins) updates about patient glucose levels in between FSBG checks in patients being treated for mild to moderate DKA or HHS. This continuous monitoring would help provide prompt identification of hypoglycemic episodes and improve safety during hospitalization, a change that could provide peace of mind to care providers and patients as the change is made from Q1 to Q4 FSBG.

Using a prospective, mixed methods study design, the investigators will assess the feasibility, usefulness, and care team acceptability of CGM in conjunction with FSBG during implementation of the new subQ DKA/HHS protocol at Regions Hospital. This will include evaluating how many patients agree to have a CGM device placed, time to place the CGM devices, CGM impact on length of stay, level of care required, frequency of alerts to changing glucose levels events, and assessing the match between CGM and FSBG readings done in the inpatient setting. Results will help inform cost effective, safe, patient-centered strategies, while gauging care team satisfaction to optimize DKA and HHS management in the future.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetic Ketoacidosis Hyperglycemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CGM with alerts

The experimental group will have a Dexcom 7 CGM placed by a trained and credentialed member of the research team, or by a trained care team member (e.g. nurse, physician, diabetes educator).

CGM devices will be set to alert the care team when interstitial glucose levels hit 250 mg/dL and 150 mg/dL. Dexcom 7s automatically alert when glucose levels are 55 mg/dL or lower. Nurses will be instructed to check the glucose trends on the CGM device when alerted. They will be asked to check glucose levels with a FSBG according to the following instructions:

1. CGM alerts to interstitial glucose level of 250 mg/dL AND trend indicates rapidly decreasing glucose levels
2. CGM alerts to interstitial glucose level of 150 mg/dL or less.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CGM with alerts

Intervention Type DEVICE

CGM devices will be set to alert the care team when interstitial glucose levels hit 250 mg/dL and 150 mg/dL. Dexcom 7s automatically alert when glucose levels are 55 mg/dL or lower. Nurses will be instructed to check the glucose trends on the CGM device when alerted. They will be asked to check glucose levels with a FSBG according to the following instructions:

1. CGM alerts to interstitial glucose level of 250 mg/dL AND trend indicates rapidly decreasing glucose levels (indicated by double down arrow on Dexcom 7)
2. CGM alerts to interstitial glucose level of 150 mg/dL or less.

CGM without alerts

The control group will have a Dexcom 7 CGM placed by a trained and credentialed member of the research team, or by a trained care team member (e.g. nurse, physician, diabetes educator).

The control group will have the device placed and glucose levels will be collected, but the device will not be set to alert (though note that the Dexcom 7 CGM will always alert when glucose drops below 55 mg/dl, so this alert will exist for both groups).

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CGM with alerts

CGM devices will be set to alert the care team when interstitial glucose levels hit 250 mg/dL and 150 mg/dL. Dexcom 7s automatically alert when glucose levels are 55 mg/dL or lower. Nurses will be instructed to check the glucose trends on the CGM device when alerted. They will be asked to check glucose levels with a FSBG according to the following instructions:

1. CGM alerts to interstitial glucose level of 250 mg/dL AND trend indicates rapidly decreasing glucose levels (indicated by double down arrow on Dexcom 7)
2. CGM alerts to interstitial glucose level of 150 mg/dL or less.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 years or older
* Presents at Regions Hospital ED including transfers from other hospitals
* Meets criteria for new subQ insulin protocol:
* Diagnosis of DKA or HHS (hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state) and provider decision to initiate insulin
* pH ≥ 7.1
* HCO3 ≥ 12

Exclusion Criteria

* Under 18 years of age
* Excluded from new subQ protocol, specifically:
* Acute CHF exacerbation
* Acute MI (ACS/NSTEMI type 1 not demand ischemia)
* CKD stage 4 or AKI with creatinine \> 3
* ESLD
* Pregnancy
* Severe sepsis or septic shock
* AMS \> if patient cannot consent
* Euglycemic DKA
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

HealthPartners Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Regions Hospital

Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Bjorn Westgard, MD

Role: CONTACT

651-254-6953

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Study Team Coordinator

Role: primary

651-254-5316

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Wallia A, Umpierrez GE, Nasraway SA, Klonoff DC; PRIDE Investigators. Round Table Discussion on Inpatient Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring at the International Hospital Diabetes Meeting. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016 Aug 22;10(5):1174-81. doi: 10.1177/1932296816656380. Print 2016 Sep.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27286715 (View on PubMed)

Park E, Kim M. Clinical Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients with Diabetic Ketoacidosis. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2023 Aug;25(8):529-537. doi: 10.1089/dia.2023.0012. Epub 2023 Jul 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37155338 (View on PubMed)

Klonoff DC, Ahn D, Drincic A. Continuous glucose monitoring: A review of the technology and clinical use. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Nov;133:178-192. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Sep 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28965029 (View on PubMed)

Faulds ER, Jones L, McNett M, Smetana KS, May CC, Sumner L, Buschur E, Exline M, Ringel MD, Dungan K. Facilitators and Barriers to Nursing Implementation of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19. Endocr Pract. 2021 Apr;27(4):354-361. doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2021.01.011. Epub 2021 Jan 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33515756 (View on PubMed)

Zelada H, Perez-Guzman MC, Chernavvsky DR, Galindo RJ. Continuous glucose monitoring for inpatient diabetes management: an update on current evidence and practice. Endocr Connect. 2023 Sep 25;12(10):e230180. doi: 10.1530/EC-23-0180. Print 2023 Oct 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37578799 (View on PubMed)

Wright JJ, Williams AJ, Friedman SB, Weaver RG, Williams JM, Hodge E, Fowler M, Bao S. Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitors for Inpatient Diabetes Management. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Sep;17(5):1252-1255. doi: 10.1177/19322968221076562. Epub 2022 Feb 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35128974 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

A24-338

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Dexcom G6 Intervention Study
NCT03877068 COMPLETED NA
Glucose Monitoring Comparison in Primary Care
NCT05222815 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA