Comparing Self Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) to Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) in Type 2 Diabetes

NCT ID: NCT01237301

Last Updated: 2018-10-17

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

124 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-10-31

Study Completion Date

2012-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of SMBG and CGM for clinical decisions related to the management of type 2 diabetes. The secondary objective is to determine the benefit of using CGM for clinical diabetes management decision-making.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study involves the use of the following 2 glucose monitoring methods to measure your blood sugar (glucose) levels and help manage type 2 diabetes:

1. Self Monitoring Blood Glucose (SMBG): blood glucose is measured 4-7 times each day using finger sticks and an blood glucose meter.
2. Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM): blood glucose is measured continuously via the CGM device. This device has been approved for use by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type 2 Diabetes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CGM Group

Wear an unblinded CGM for 16 weeks. Subjects continued previously started medication regiments for their diabetes. Subjects in this arm were randomized to use real time continuous glucose monitoring (rt CGM).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CGM Group

Intervention Type DEVICE

Using CGM unblinded for 16 weeks versus fingersticks 4 to 7 times a day to evaluate which is more beneficial in type 2 diabetes.

SMBG Group

Use SMBG 4 to 7 times a day for 16 weeks. Subjects continued previously started medication regiments for their diabetes. Subjects in this arm were randomized to use structured self monitoring blood glucose (stSMBG) and periodic, blinded continuous glucose monitoring (CGM).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

SMBG Group

Intervention Type DEVICE

Fingersticks 4 to 7 times a day to evaluate which is more beneficial in type 2 diabetes. Used CGM blinded once every four weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CGM Group

Using CGM unblinded for 16 weeks versus fingersticks 4 to 7 times a day to evaluate which is more beneficial in type 2 diabetes.

Intervention Type DEVICE

SMBG Group

Fingersticks 4 to 7 times a day to evaluate which is more beneficial in type 2 diabetes. Used CGM blinded once every four weeks.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

DexCom SevenPlus CGM AccuChek Aviva blood glucose meter AccuChek Aviva blood glucose meter DexCom SevenPlus CGM

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or female ≥18 and ≤75 years of age (Upper range to assure dexterity for use of CGM)
* Clinical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes
* HbA1c ≥7.0%
* Diabetes can be treated with any of the following therapies within one month prior to study enrollment: (1) medical nutrition therapy alone or with metformin; (2) sulfonylurea with or without metformin; (3) dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitor or Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist with or without metformin; or insulin with or without metformin.

Exclusion Criteria

* Treated with Thiazolidinediones (TZD)
* Administered prednisone or cortisone medications in the previous 30 days
* Currently pregnant or planning pregnancy during the study period
* Presence of any severe medical or psychological condition or chronic conditions/infections that in the opinion of the Investigator would compromise the subject's safety or successful participation in the study
* HbA1c \<7.0%
* Unable to follow the study protocol
* Unable to speak, read and write in English
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Roche Diagnostics GmbH

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

International Diabetes Center at Park Nicollet

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

HealthPartners Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Richard M. Bergenstal, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

International Diabetes Center at Park Nicollet

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

International Diabetes Center

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Mazze RS, Strock E, Wesley D, Borgman S, Morgan B, Bergenstal R, Cuddihy R. Characterizing glucose exposure for individuals with normal glucose tolerance using continuous glucose monitoring and ambulatory glucose profile analysis. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008 Jun;10(3):149-59. doi: 10.1089/dia.2007.0293.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18473688 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

04034-10-C

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Glucose Monitoring Comparison in Primary Care
NCT05222815 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Time in Glucose Hospital Target
NCT05135676 COMPLETED NA