Trial Outcomes & Findings for Comparing Self Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) to Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) in Type 2 Diabetes (NCT NCT01237301)
NCT ID: NCT01237301
Last Updated: 2018-10-17
Results Overview
COMPLETED
NA
124 participants
2 week baseline to 16 week final
2018-10-17
Participant Flow
Recruitment Period October 29, 2010 through November 25, 2011. Study Location: Clinic
Participant milestones
| Measure |
CGM Group
Wear an unblinded CGM for 16 weeks.
Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) : Using CGM unblinded for 16 weeks versus fingersticks 4 to 7 times a day to evaluate which is more beneficial in type 2 diabetes.
|
SMBG Group
Use SMBG 4 to 7 times a day for 16 weeks.
Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) : Using CGM unblinded for 16 weeks versus fingersticks 4 to 7 times a day to evaluate which is more beneficial in type 2 diabetes.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
65
|
59
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
60
|
55
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
5
|
4
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Comparing Self Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) to Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) in Type 2 Diabetes
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
CGM Group
n=65 Participants
Wear an unblinded CGM for 16 weeks.
Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) : Using CGM unblinded for 16 weeks versus fingersticks 4 to 7 times a day to evaluate which is more beneficial in type 2 diabetes.
|
SMBG Group
n=59 Participants
Use SMBG 4 to 7 times a day for 16 weeks.
Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) : Using CGM unblinded for 16 weeks versus fingersticks 4 to 7 times a day to evaluate which is more beneficial in type 2 diabetes.
|
Total
n=124 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
46 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
47 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
93 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
59.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9 • n=5 Participants
|
58.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10 • n=7 Participants
|
59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
61 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
63 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
65 participants
n=5 Participants
|
59 participants
n=7 Participants
|
124 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 week baseline to 16 week finalPopulation: Per Protocol
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CGM Group
n=65 Participants
Wear an unblinded CGM for 16 weeks.
Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) : Using CGM unblinded for 16 weeks versus fingersticks 4 to 7 times a day to evaluate which is more beneficial in type 2 diabetes.
|
SMBG Group
n=59 Participants
Use SMBG 4 to 7 times a day for 16 weeks.
Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) : Using CGM unblinded for 16 weeks versus fingersticks 4 to 7 times a day to evaluate which is more beneficial in type 2 diabetes.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Change in Hemoglobin A1c
|
-1.12 percentage of HbA1c
Standard Deviation 1.07
|
-0.82 percentage of HbA1c
Standard Deviation 0.91
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 16 weeksThe secondary objective is to determine the incremental benefit of CGM for clinical decision-making by using (area under the diurnal median curve). Data was collected to create the curve at every hour of modal day. Example: hours 1-24 of each day. Modal day reflects 14 days worth of CGM data aggregated into a single 24 hour day graph.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CGM Group
n=59 Participants
Wear an unblinded CGM for 16 weeks.
Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) : Using CGM unblinded for 16 weeks versus fingersticks 4 to 7 times a day to evaluate which is more beneficial in type 2 diabetes.
|
SMBG Group
n=55 Participants
Use SMBG 4 to 7 times a day for 16 weeks.
Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) : Using CGM unblinded for 16 weeks versus fingersticks 4 to 7 times a day to evaluate which is more beneficial in type 2 diabetes.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Glucose Exposure (Area Under the Diurnal Median Curve)
|
-615.98 mcg*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 924.04
|
-522.88 mcg*hr/mL
Standard Deviation 951.43
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 16 weeksThe secondary objective is to determine the incremental benefit of CGM for clinical decision-making using percent time in hypoglycemia range (\< 50 mg/dL). Numerator: amount of time with a value of 49 mg/dL or less. Denominator: total amount of time of CGM measurement. CGM used for this study produced measurements once every 15 minutes or 360 times per day.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CGM Group
n=59 Participants
Wear an unblinded CGM for 16 weeks.
Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) : Using CGM unblinded for 16 weeks versus fingersticks 4 to 7 times a day to evaluate which is more beneficial in type 2 diabetes.
|
SMBG Group
n=55 Participants
Use SMBG 4 to 7 times a day for 16 weeks.
Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) : Using CGM unblinded for 16 weeks versus fingersticks 4 to 7 times a day to evaluate which is more beneficial in type 2 diabetes.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Time in Hypoglycemia Range
|
-0.42 % of time in hypoglycemia
Standard Deviation 1.88
|
0.14 % of time in hypoglycemia
Standard Deviation 1.22
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 16 weeksGlucose Variability - Interquartile Range used to determine incremental benefit of CGM for clinical decision making. IQR results reflect the change delta from baseline to 16 weeks. IQR is calculated for each subject at each visit. The change in IQR was calculated as final IQR minus baseline IQR. This measure represents an average of the individual subjects IQR delta (baseline to 16 weeks/final).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CGM Group
n=59 Participants
Wear an unblinded CGM for 16 weeks.
Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) : Using CGM unblinded for 16 weeks versus fingersticks 4 to 7 times a day to evaluate which is more beneficial in type 2 diabetes.
|
SMBG Group
n=55 Participants
Use SMBG 4 to 7 times a day for 16 weeks.
Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) : Using CGM unblinded for 16 weeks versus fingersticks 4 to 7 times a day to evaluate which is more beneficial in type 2 diabetes.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in CGM Glucose Variability
|
-8.36 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 15.95
|
-5.91 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 16.73
|
Adverse Events
CGM Group
SMBG Group
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
CGM Group
n=65 participants at risk
Wear an unblinded CGM for 16 weeks.
Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) : Using CGM unblinded for 16 weeks versus fingersticks 4 to 7 times a day to evaluate which is more beneficial in type 2 diabetes.
|
SMBG Group
n=59 participants at risk
Use SMBG 4 to 7 times a day for 16 weeks.
Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) : Using CGM unblinded for 16 weeks versus fingersticks 4 to 7 times a day to evaluate which is more beneficial in type 2 diabetes.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Cellulitis
|
0.00%
0/65 • During the period of the 16 week study.
Review every four weeks of SMBG or CGM data as well as patient reported events at each study visit.
|
1.7%
1/59 • Number of events 1 • During the period of the 16 week study.
Review every four weeks of SMBG or CGM data as well as patient reported events at each study visit.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Prostate Cancer
|
1.5%
1/65 • Number of events 1 • During the period of the 16 week study.
Review every four weeks of SMBG or CGM data as well as patient reported events at each study visit.
|
0.00%
0/59 • During the period of the 16 week study.
Review every four weeks of SMBG or CGM data as well as patient reported events at each study visit.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place