Interstitial Lung Disease Exacerbations Study

NCT ID: NCT06685874

Last Updated: 2025-05-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

1500 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-05-01

Study Completion Date

2026-08-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is an umbrella term covering numerous conditions that affect the lung tissue, interfering with the ability of the lungs to take up oxygen. Most ILDs get worse gradually, but sometimes patients can experience a sudden worsening in their symptoms called an acute exacerbation (AE-ILD). Most studies in this area have been done in AEs of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF), as IPF is the commonest form of ILD. AE-IPF has very poor outcomes, however AEs of other ILDs are less well studied. Furthermore, there is currently no treatment guideline or established standard of care for the management of patients with AE-fILD.

The aim of this research project is to gain a better understanding of AE-ILD in a real-world population. By looking at the clinical records of patients with AE-ILD, the study aims to describe the patient population that gets AE-ILD and how these patients are treated in the "real world" setting. The study will also gather information on patient characteristics such as type of ILD and test results at the time of AE-ILD, and see if any of these factors are associated with better/ worse outcomes in AE-ILD. Finally, the study will collect data on the treatment approaches taken, including both medical therapy such as steroid treatment, as well as specialist care team input. This data on treatment will be used to identify associations between individual treatments and outcomes, as well as to evaluate the NHS services being provided to patients with AE-ILD.

Overall, this study will enhance understanding of AE-ILD. This study will provide information to help design clinical trials to test treatments for AE-ILD, to help us create evidence-based clinical guidelines for AE-ILD, and improve the management of patients with AE-ILD.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and other progressive fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (PF-ILDs) are increasingly common fatal disorders with a median life expectancy from diagnosis of 3-5 years. Fibrotic interstitial lung disease (fILD) is a general term for a group of conditions that involve scarring of the lung (fibrosis) with or without evidence of inflammation. While different ILDs are associated with different aetiological factors and disease courses, there is considerable overlap in the characteristics of these conditions. In general, fILDs usually progress in terms of symptoms, lung function, and radiological features, resulting in increasing symptoms and respiratory failure.

In addition to the gradual progression that is typical of fILD, these conditions can become acutely worse during episodes of acute exacerbation (AE-fILD). An AE can be defined as an acute (less than one month) deterioration in symptoms associated with new ground glass changes on CT chest and not explained by other pathology such as pulmonary embolus, pneumothorax, or cardiac failure (adapted from the definition by Collard et al for AE-IPF). The prognosis of acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), the commonest form of fILD, is very poor (over 90% in-hospital mortality in some reports). However, there has been very little research on AEs in non-IPF fILD.

Furthermore, there is currently no treatment guideline or established standard of care for the management of patients with AE-fILD. Other significant gaps in the literature in this area, include:

* What is the typical clinical course and outcome of acute exacerbations in non-IPF fILD?
* What features predict the risk of in-hospital and post-discharge mortality from AE-fILD (e.g. age, sex, baseline diagnosis)?
* Are currently used treatments for AE-fILD effective? How should AE-fILD be managed (steroids, oxygen therapy etc)?
* How well are aspects of care that patients find important (e.g. provision of specialist palliative care, opportunities to discuss advanced care planning, and oxygen therapy) delivered to patients with AE-fILD?

There are significant gaps in the literature in the field of AE-fILD. Much of the current practice in AE-fILD management is based on clinical judgement, and adequately powered randomised controlled trials to identify appropriate treatment approaches have not been performed. This has led to significant heterogeneity in the approach to AE-fILD between clinicians and centres, an issue illustrated by the fact that only one of seven NHS trusts in the East Midlands has a treatment guideline specific for the management of AE-fILD (unpublished data). This lack of consistency in approach poses a significant challenge to the design of randomised control trials, as heterogeneity within a standard care control arm can obscure any specific signals. Furthermore, in the absence of RCTs, there is the potential that clinicians may unintentionally use interventions that are harmful.

The study is an observational cohort study of patients admitted to hospital with AE-fILD to answer the questions listed above. These data will help to clarify research priorities in this area, and identify areas where care could improve and allow us to make recommendations for clinical care. The study will also use these data to inform and generate hypotheses for future clinical trials.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) Pulmonary Fibrosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients with exacerbation of fibrotic interstitial lung disease

Patients with exacerbation of fibrotic interstitial lung disease as per inclusion and exclusion criteria

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients admitted to an acute NHS trust during study period 1st September 2022-31st August 2023 with an underlying or new diagnosis of an ILD (defined by ICD-10 codes in Table 1) with a fibrotic phenotype (established fibrosis on current or previous radiological imaging) AND
* Increasing pulmonary symptoms AND
* No extra-parenchymal cause identified as primary cause of admission

* Segmental or larger pulmonary embolus as main discharge diagnosis in absence of acute exacerbation features on imaging
* Pleural effusion as main discharge diagnosis
* Pneumothorax as main discharge diagnosis in absence of acute exacerbation features on imaging
* Left sided heart failure or volume overload

Exclusion Criteria

* No underlying or new diagnosis of ILD with a fibrotic phenotype
* Acute presentation of pneumonitis/ILD without evidence of fibrosis (Table 2)
* Non-respiratory related hospital admission (no increasing pulmonary symptoms)
* Respiratory related hospital admission due to extra-parenchymal cause

* Segmental or larger pulmonary embolus as main discharge diagnosis in absence of acute exacerbation features on imaging
* Pleural effusion as main discharge diagnosis
* Pneumothorax as main discharge diagnosis in absence of acute exacerbation features on imaging
* Left sided heart failure or volume overload
* Participant signatory to NHS National Data Opt Out
* Elective/non-emergency admission
* Admission under non-medical specialty
* In cases where there are \>=1 eligible admissions only the first (index) admission shall be included
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospitals, Leicester

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

North Bristol NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael Gibbons, MBChB

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Royal Devon and University healthcare trust

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust

Bath, , United Kingdom

Site Status

North Bristol NHS Trust

Bristol, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Royal Devon University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Exeter, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2501703

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Markers of COPD Exacerbations
NCT05315674 RECRUITING