Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
1500 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-05-01
2026-08-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of this research project is to gain a better understanding of AE-ILD in a real-world population. By looking at the clinical records of patients with AE-ILD, the study aims to describe the patient population that gets AE-ILD and how these patients are treated in the "real world" setting. The study will also gather information on patient characteristics such as type of ILD and test results at the time of AE-ILD, and see if any of these factors are associated with better/ worse outcomes in AE-ILD. Finally, the study will collect data on the treatment approaches taken, including both medical therapy such as steroid treatment, as well as specialist care team input. This data on treatment will be used to identify associations between individual treatments and outcomes, as well as to evaluate the NHS services being provided to patients with AE-ILD.
Overall, this study will enhance understanding of AE-ILD. This study will provide information to help design clinical trials to test treatments for AE-ILD, to help us create evidence-based clinical guidelines for AE-ILD, and improve the management of patients with AE-ILD.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Registry for Exploring Clinical and Epidemiological Characteristics of Interstitial Lung Diseases - EXCITING
NCT02645968
PRospective Evaluation of Interstitial Lung DIsease Progression With Quantitative CT
NCT05609201
A Study of the Natural Progression of Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD)
NCT00470327
Endothelial Dysfunction in Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
NCT01460082
FIBRotic Interstitial Lung Disease and Nocturnal OXygen
NCT04586946
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In addition to the gradual progression that is typical of fILD, these conditions can become acutely worse during episodes of acute exacerbation (AE-fILD). An AE can be defined as an acute (less than one month) deterioration in symptoms associated with new ground glass changes on CT chest and not explained by other pathology such as pulmonary embolus, pneumothorax, or cardiac failure (adapted from the definition by Collard et al for AE-IPF). The prognosis of acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), the commonest form of fILD, is very poor (over 90% in-hospital mortality in some reports). However, there has been very little research on AEs in non-IPF fILD.
Furthermore, there is currently no treatment guideline or established standard of care for the management of patients with AE-fILD. Other significant gaps in the literature in this area, include:
* What is the typical clinical course and outcome of acute exacerbations in non-IPF fILD?
* What features predict the risk of in-hospital and post-discharge mortality from AE-fILD (e.g. age, sex, baseline diagnosis)?
* Are currently used treatments for AE-fILD effective? How should AE-fILD be managed (steroids, oxygen therapy etc)?
* How well are aspects of care that patients find important (e.g. provision of specialist palliative care, opportunities to discuss advanced care planning, and oxygen therapy) delivered to patients with AE-fILD?
There are significant gaps in the literature in the field of AE-fILD. Much of the current practice in AE-fILD management is based on clinical judgement, and adequately powered randomised controlled trials to identify appropriate treatment approaches have not been performed. This has led to significant heterogeneity in the approach to AE-fILD between clinicians and centres, an issue illustrated by the fact that only one of seven NHS trusts in the East Midlands has a treatment guideline specific for the management of AE-fILD (unpublished data). This lack of consistency in approach poses a significant challenge to the design of randomised control trials, as heterogeneity within a standard care control arm can obscure any specific signals. Furthermore, in the absence of RCTs, there is the potential that clinicians may unintentionally use interventions that are harmful.
The study is an observational cohort study of patients admitted to hospital with AE-fILD to answer the questions listed above. These data will help to clarify research priorities in this area, and identify areas where care could improve and allow us to make recommendations for clinical care. The study will also use these data to inform and generate hypotheses for future clinical trials.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients with exacerbation of fibrotic interstitial lung disease
Patients with exacerbation of fibrotic interstitial lung disease as per inclusion and exclusion criteria
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Increasing pulmonary symptoms AND
* No extra-parenchymal cause identified as primary cause of admission
* Segmental or larger pulmonary embolus as main discharge diagnosis in absence of acute exacerbation features on imaging
* Pleural effusion as main discharge diagnosis
* Pneumothorax as main discharge diagnosis in absence of acute exacerbation features on imaging
* Left sided heart failure or volume overload
Exclusion Criteria
* Acute presentation of pneumonitis/ILD without evidence of fibrosis (Table 2)
* Non-respiratory related hospital admission (no increasing pulmonary symptoms)
* Respiratory related hospital admission due to extra-parenchymal cause
* Segmental or larger pulmonary embolus as main discharge diagnosis in absence of acute exacerbation features on imaging
* Pleural effusion as main discharge diagnosis
* Pneumothorax as main discharge diagnosis in absence of acute exacerbation features on imaging
* Left sided heart failure or volume overload
* Participant signatory to NHS National Data Opt Out
* Elective/non-emergency admission
* Admission under non-medical specialty
* In cases where there are \>=1 eligible admissions only the first (index) admission shall be included
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospitals, Leicester
OTHER
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
OTHER
North Bristol NHS Trust
OTHER
Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER_GOV
Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael Gibbons, MBChB
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Royal Devon and University healthcare trust
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust
Bath, , United Kingdom
North Bristol NHS Trust
Bristol, , United Kingdom
Royal Devon University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Exeter, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2501703
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.