Preoperative Prediction of Difficult Laryngoscopy in Diabetic Patients: Importance of the Palm Print Test

NCT ID: NCT06676865

Last Updated: 2024-11-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-12-01

Study Completion Date

2024-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators assessed upper airway management at the pre-anaesthetic consultation using the usual clinical criteria. On the day before surgery, diabetic patients were assessed for the palm print sign to predict difficult laryngoscopy. After induction of anesthesia, laryngoscopy was performed with a Macintosh metal laryngoscope blade. At this stage of the study, patients were categorized into two groups: difficult and easy laryngoscopy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

During pre-anesthesia consultation, all participants were assessed for airway conditions using usual clinical tests (Mallampati classification, Thyromental distance, mouth-opening test, upper lip biting test (ULBT), Head extension and Prayer sign). Demographic characteristics, diabetes duration, Blood glucose regulation and diabetes-related complications were also recorded.

On the day before surgery, patients were assessed for the palm print sign during preoperative evaluation rounds. On the day of surgery, after an intravenous line (IV) and complete monitoring, induction of anesthesia was initiated, and a muscle relaxant was used to facilitate intubation. Laryngoscopy was performed with a Macintosh metal laryngoscope blade by an anesthesiologist who had more than 2 years of intubation experience. McGrath® videolaryngoscope, McCoy laryngoscope, LMA Fastrack®, or i-gel® airway were kept ready for emergency situations. At this stage of the study, patients were categorized into two groups: difficult and easy laryngoscopy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Difficult Laryngoscopy Diabetes Preoperative Period

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

adult Diabetic patients scheduled for surgery under general anesthesia.

Were included patients with known cases of diabetes mellitus, aged more than 18 years, undergoing surgery under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation.

This study excluded patients with physical or intellectual disabilities preventing cooperation, Malformations, trauma, tumors, or infections of the maxillofacial region and upper airways, a history of burns or cervicofacial irradiation, and neurosurgical conditions causing temporomandibular pseudoankylosis. Additional exclusions included patients with conditions causing hand joint stiffness (e.g., carpal tunnel syndrome, Dupuytren's disease, scleroderma, rheumatoid arthritis), restricted cervical mobility (due to osteoarthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, or cervical trauma), a history of difficult intubation as well as pregnancy (including up to six weeks postpartum)

the palm print test

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The patient's dominant hand was pressed firmly against a blue ink pad, then onto a white sheet of paper without applying body weight. The palm prints were scored as follows:

* Grade 0: All phalangeal areas visible
* Grade 1: Deficiency in the interphalangeal areas of the 4th and 5th digits
* Grade 2: Deficiency in the interphalangeal areas of the 2nd to 5th digits
* Grade 3: Only the tips of the digits visible The palm print test was scored from 0 to 3. Grades 2 and 3 were considered indicators of difficult intubation.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

the palm print test

The patient's dominant hand was pressed firmly against a blue ink pad, then onto a white sheet of paper without applying body weight. The palm prints were scored as follows:

* Grade 0: All phalangeal areas visible
* Grade 1: Deficiency in the interphalangeal areas of the 4th and 5th digits
* Grade 2: Deficiency in the interphalangeal areas of the 2nd to 5th digits
* Grade 3: Only the tips of the digits visible The palm print test was scored from 0 to 3. Grades 2 and 3 were considered indicators of difficult intubation.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* diabetes mellitus
* aged more than 18 years
* undergoing surgery under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation.

Exclusion Criteria

* physical or intellectual disabilities preventing cooperation
* Malformations, trauma, tumors, or infections of the maxillofacial region and upper airways,
* a history of burns or cervicofacial irradiation
* neurosurgical conditions causing temporomandibular pseudoankylosis.
* hand joint stiffness (e.g., carpal tunnel syndrome, Dupuytren's disease, scleroderma, rheumatoid arthritis)
* restricted cervical mobility (due to osteoarthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, or cervical trauma),
* a history of difficult intubation
* pregnancy (including up to six weeks postpartum)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mongi Slim Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mhamed Sami Mebazaa

Clinical Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mongi Slim University Hospital

Tunis, , Tunisia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Tunisia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Palm print test

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Type 2 Diabetes in Fayoum
NCT03683784 COMPLETED