Inflammatory Challenge in Human Aggression.

NCT ID: NCT06665074

Last Updated: 2025-06-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

112 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-08-01

Study Completion Date

2030-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to explore the differences in behavioral and cytokine response to a low dose infusion of endotoxin (vs. placebo) in individuals with histories of frequent, problematic, impulsive aggression ("aggressives") compared to similar individuals without this history ("controls"). Endotoxin is a substance that produces a reliable inflammation response in human subjects. The main questions it aims to answer are:

* Do aggressive individuals have greater self-rated anger responses to low-dose endotoxin compared with controls?
* Do aggressive individuals have greater analog aggressive responses (in the Taylor Aggression Paradigm) to low-dose endotoxin compared with controls?
* Do aggressive individuals have greater hostile attributional and negative emotional responses (in the V-SEIP) to low-dose endotoxin compared with controls?
* Do aggressive individuals have greater plasma pro-inflammatory responses to low-dose endotoxin compared with controls?
* Do aggressive individuals display a greater activation of brain responses to anger-related picture during an MRI scan during low-dose endotoxin compared with controls? Researchers will compare endotoxin to a placebo (a look-alike substance that contains no drug) explore the differences in behavioral and cytokine response to a low dose infusion of endotoxin (vs. placebo) in individuals with histories of frequent, problematic, impulsive aggression ("aggressives") compared to similar individuals without this history ("controls").

Participants will:

* Receive a low-dose of endotoxin and placebo on two (2) separate days. The study drugs will be given through a plastic tube inserted in a forearm vein.
* Visit the laboratory on at least two (2) separate days to receive the endotoxin and placebo.
* Complete rating forms, behavioral testing, and an MRI on each of the two (2) laboratory days.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

While elevations of circulating pro-inflammatory modulators correlate directly with variables of aggression, and direct application of cytokines to specific cortico- limbic regions in animals elicit aggressive responding, no studies have tested the hypothesis that acute increases in pro-inflammatory modulators can/will increase aggressive behavior in humans. The investigators aim to demonstrate a causal relationship between pro-inflammatory cytokines and aggression in human subjects by showing that an acute pro-inflammatory state, via endotoxin challenge, will increase aggressive responding, anger ratings, and hostile social cognition, to a greater degree in "aggressive" (n = 45), compared with "non-aggressive" (n = 45), individuals with mood/anxiety/ stress-related and/or personality disorders. The proposed study is a double-blind comparison of endotoxin/placebo challenge in the same individuals (within-subject) as a function of aggression status. Aggressive individuals will have high lifetime aggression (\> 12 on Life History of Aggression: LHA) and be positive for an average of two anger attacks per week and/or three anger attacks per year that include physical assault of another person and/or or non-trivial destruction of property. "Non-Aggressive" individuals will be similar diagnostically but will have low lifetime aggression. "Aggressive responding" will be assessed using the Taylor Aggression Paradigm (TAP), "Anger" will be assessed by self-reported assessments (Profile of Mood States: POMS), and "Hostile Social Cognition" will be assessed by the Video-Social and Emotional Information Processing (V-SEIP) paradigm. The primary plasma pro-inflammatory outcome measures will be a composite of CRP, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α (as in the investigators' previous studies). MRI scans will including task-based scans involving "explicit" and "ambiguous" social threat. The investigators hypothesize that aggressive responding, anger ratings, and hostile social cognition (Primary Outcomes) and Composite Plasma Pro-Inflammatory Marker levels (Secondary Outcome), will be greater after endotoxin, compared with placebo, and will be greater in "aggressive" than "non- aggressive" study participants. The Investigators also hypothesize that these variables will correlate with dimensional measures of aggression. In addition, the investigators hypothesize that amygdala responses to explicit social threat (anger faces) will be enhanced (greater BOLD fMRI signal response) after Endotoxin, and that cortico-limbic responses to ambiguous social threat (V-SEIP) will be reduced (i.e., lesser BOLD fMRI signal response) in all study participants but reduced to a greater extent in "aggressive", compared with "non- aggressive", study participants. Finally, the investigators hypothesize that the pro-inflammatory effects of the endotoxin challenge will result in reduced connectivity between the functional edges supporting higher aggressive behavior and that endotoxin challenge will facilitate stronger connections among nodes associated with low aggressive behavior. If supported, this study will provide a strong rationale for clinical trials of anti-inflammatory agents in impulsive aggressive individuals.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intermittent Explosive Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors
Placebo (saline infusion)

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Aggressive Subjects

Subjects with Intermittent Explosive Disorder (IED)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Endotoxin (E. coli O:113, Reference Endotoxin)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Dosage of endotoxin is 0.8 ng/Kg body Weight

Saline (Placebo)

Intervention Type OTHER

Volume of saline to be the same as volume of endotoxin

Non-Aggressive Subjects

Subjects without IED

Group Type OTHER

Endotoxin (E. coli O:113, Reference Endotoxin)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Dosage of endotoxin is 0.8 ng/Kg body Weight

Saline (Placebo)

Intervention Type OTHER

Volume of saline to be the same as volume of endotoxin

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Endotoxin (E. coli O:113, Reference Endotoxin)

Dosage of endotoxin is 0.8 ng/Kg body Weight

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Saline (Placebo)

Volume of saline to be the same as volume of endotoxin

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

"Aggressive Subjects" will have a current DSM-5 diagnosis of Intermittent Explosive Disorder (IED) and have a Life History of Aggression (LHA) \> 12.

"Control Subjects" will not have current or past history of IED and will have LHA scores \< 11 ("Control Subjects" may have a past, but not current, history of Major Depression (MD), Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD), Panic Disorder (PDx), or Post-Traumatic Stress (PTSD) Disorder.

Participant is between 21 and 55 years of age and is able to give informed consent.

Participant is physically healthy as confirmed by medical history, physical evaluation, and (in females) a negative pregnancy test.

Exclusion Criteria

Participants with a current clinically significant medical condition.

Participants current co-morbid Major Depression (MD), Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD), Panic Disorder (PDx), or Post-Traumatic Stress (PTSD) Disorder.

Participants currently taking prescribed medications for an active medical or psychiatric condition.

Participants not free of prescribed medications for four weeks.

Participants with Grade 2 or higher abnormalities on clinical laboratory examination (e.g., CBC with Differential, Metabolic Panel, and PT/INR/PTTa).

Participants with Bradycardia (i.e., heart rate \< 50 beats/minute) or other Grade 2 or higher ECG abnormality.

Participants with autoimmune conditions (e.g., asthma, psoriasis, etc.)

Participants who are immunocompromised.

Participants taking immunomodulatory, or anti-inflammatory, agents.

Participants that are pregnant, breastfeeding, or plan to become pregnant within nine months of enrollment in the study.

Female study participants of childbearing potential must remain abstinent or agree to use a highly effective form of contraception (e.g., an intrauterine device). Childbearing potential is defined as, study participants who have reached menarche and have not undergone a documented sterilization procedure (i.e., hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, or salpingotomy), and have not reached menopause.

Life history of bipolar disorder / schizophrenia / organic mental syndrome, or intellectual disability.

Current alcohol / drug use disorder of greater than mild severity.

Current suicidal ideation.

History of a suicide attempt in the past year prior to study entry.

Life history of \> 3 or more suicide attempts of any type.

Life history of any moderately severe suicide attempt.

Current or life history of homicidal ideation.

Current or life history of felony assault and/or battery.

Currently on parole for aggressive behavior.

Allergy, or contraindication, to receiving endotoxin.

Current treatment with opiates or any agents that affect pain threshold (exclusionary for the TAP).

Unwilling/unable to sign informed consent document.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ohio State University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Emil Coccaro

Professor of Psychiatry

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Emil F. Coccaro, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Ohio State University College of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Ohio State University Medical Center

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Emil F. Coccaro, MD

Role: CONTACT

7738521338

Julian Roberts, RN

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Emil Coccaro, MD

Role: primary

773-852-1338

Julian Roberts, RN

Role: backup

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01MH133925-01A1

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

2023H0217

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Inflammatory Challenge and Fear
NCT06630884 RECRUITING PHASE1
Efficacy Trial of Stress Check-Up
NCT03423394 COMPLETED NA