Dorsal Vetilation and PPCs in Colorectal Cancer Surgery Patients
NCT ID: NCT06662799
Last Updated: 2025-01-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
92 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-07-01
2024-12-25
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Mechanical ventilation during general anesthesia can lead to a redistribution of ventilation, increase the aereation in the ventral parts of the lung, whereas reduce ventilation in the dorsal parts of the lung compared with spontaneous breathing (SB) in the awake state in supine position. The reduction of ventilation of dorsal lung regions indicates the presence of dorsal atelectasis during mechanical ventilation after general anesthesia, which may be associated with PPCs. However, there is still no evidence to reveal the association between the reduction of dorsal ventilation and PPCs.
Recently, electrical impedance tomography (EIT), which allows visualization of lung ventilation in real time, and assessment of regional lung ventilation. It is feasible to assess the change of ventral/dorsal lung ventilation during the surgery using EIT. To date, no study has investigated whether the change of ventral/dorsal lung ventilation revealed by EIT could be associated with PPCs.
So, this prospective observational study aims to clarify whether patients developing postoperative pulmonary complications had higher reduction of dorsal lung ventilation during operation after general anesthesia as compared to patients not developing postoperative pulmonary complications. Ratio of dorsal ventilation during spontaneous respiration (T0) in the awake state as a reference, the proportion of dorsal ventilation after anesthesia induction and endotracheal intubation (T1), body position change and capnoperitoneum (T2), and at the end of surgery (T3) were analyzed. Thereafter, evaluating the change of dorsal ventilation in patients with PPCs and without PPCs at different time points.
According to the method of sample size calculation published by Scaramuzzo G et al. (Anesthesiology. 2024 Oct 1;141(4):693-706.). A minimum sample size required for this study was calculated as following: using the difference of reduction of dorsal ventilation at the end of surgery between the patients with PPCs and non-PPCs as the primary outcome. Considering the data of our preliminary experiment showed that a reduction of dorsal lung ventilation at the end of surgery is 12 ± 6% and hypothesizing 30% of patients experiencing postoperative pulmonary complications and a relative clinically relevant increase in reduction of dorsal lung ventilation of 40% in those with postoperative pulmonary complications, we found that 83 patients were sufficient to evaluate differences between groups (effect size 0.8) with a power of 0.90 and an α error of 0.05. Considering a dropout of 10%, we found a minimum sample size of 92 patients.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The PROtective Ventilation Using Open Lung Approach Or Not Trial
NCT03160144
Effect of Prone Position Training on Pulmonary Complications in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
NCT06001411
Role of Indexed Oxygen Delivery in Anastomotic Insufficiencies in Elective Laparoscopic Colorectal Resections for Cancer
NCT07099820
Impact of Perioperative Intravenous Fluid Utilization on Postoperative Outcomes
NCT01563991
Immunological and Oxidative Stress Response in Relation to Abdominal Cancer Surgery
NCT03473327
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ASA grade I-III
* The patients who are planning to undergo laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery
Exclusion Criteria
* Time of surgery less than 2 hours
* Preoperatively present upper respiratory tract infection or acute pulmonary infection
* Previous history of pulmonary surgery
* Preoperative use of home ventilator
* Inability to perform EIT monitoring
* Declined to participate in this study
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
xiangming fang
Director of the Anesthesiology Department
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The first Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University.
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IIT20240443B
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.