Dorsal Vetilation and PPCs in Colorectal Cancer Surgery Patients

NCT ID: NCT06662799

Last Updated: 2025-01-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

92 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-07-01

Study Completion Date

2024-12-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are common in patients after major abdominal surgery. It has been shown that 5-40% of patients occur PPCs after major surgery, and the mid to high PPC rate is observed after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. PPCs are associated with poor clinical outcomes including prolonged hospital length of stay and increased morbidity and mortality.

Mechanical ventilation during general anesthesia can lead to a redistribution of ventilation, increase the aereation in the ventral parts of the lung, whereas reduce ventilation in the dorsal parts of the lung compared with spontaneous breathing (SB) in the awake state in supine position. The reduction of ventilation of dorsal lung regions indicates the presence of dorsal atelectasis during mechanical ventilation after general anesthesia, which may be associated with PPCs. However, there is still no evidence to reveal the association between the reduction of dorsal ventilation and PPCs.

Recently, electrical impedance tomography (EIT), which allows visualization of lung ventilation in real time, and assessment of regional lung ventilation. It is feasible to assess the change of ventral/dorsal lung ventilation during the surgery using EIT. To date, no study has investigated whether the change of ventral/dorsal lung ventilation revealed by EIT could be associated with PPCs.

So, this prospective observational study aims to clarify whether patients developing postoperative pulmonary complications had higher reduction of dorsal lung ventilation during operation after general anesthesia as compared to patients not developing postoperative pulmonary complications. Ratio of dorsal ventilation during spontaneous respiration (T0) in the awake state as a reference, the proportion of dorsal ventilation after anesthesia induction and endotracheal intubation (T1), body position change and capnoperitoneum (T2), and at the end of surgery (T3) were analyzed. Thereafter, evaluating the change of dorsal ventilation in patients with PPCs and without PPCs at different time points.

According to the method of sample size calculation published by Scaramuzzo G et al. (Anesthesiology. 2024 Oct 1;141(4):693-706.). A minimum sample size required for this study was calculated as following: using the difference of reduction of dorsal ventilation at the end of surgery between the patients with PPCs and non-PPCs as the primary outcome. Considering the data of our preliminary experiment showed that a reduction of dorsal lung ventilation at the end of surgery is 12 ± 6% and hypothesizing 30% of patients experiencing postoperative pulmonary complications and a relative clinically relevant increase in reduction of dorsal lung ventilation of 40% in those with postoperative pulmonary complications, we found that 83 patients were sufficient to evaluate differences between groups (effect size 0.8) with a power of 0.90 and an α error of 0.05. Considering a dropout of 10%, we found a minimum sample size of 92 patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal Surgery Postoperative Pulmonary Complications (PPCs)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥18 years
* ASA grade I-III
* The patients who are planning to undergo laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* Emergency surgery
* Time of surgery less than 2 hours
* Preoperatively present upper respiratory tract infection or acute pulmonary infection
* Previous history of pulmonary surgery
* Preoperative use of home ventilator
* Inability to perform EIT monitoring
* Declined to participate in this study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

xiangming fang

Director of the Anesthesiology Department

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The first Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University.

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IIT20240443B

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Gut Oxygenation and Laparoscopy
NCT01040013 COMPLETED PHASE2
CPET in Colorectal Surgery
NCT02298907 COMPLETED