Optimal Intensity of Reactive Balance Training for Healthy Older Adults

NCT ID: NCT06657989

Last Updated: 2025-01-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

96 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-01-21

Study Completion Date

2027-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Falls in daily life are a serious risk for older adults. A new type of balance training, called reactive balance training (RBT) involves people losing balance many times so that they can practice fast balance reactions, like stepping reactions. Differences in training program features might explain differences in the results of previous RBT studies. Training intensity is the difficulty or challenge of the training program. It would be valuable to know if high-intensity RBT improves balance reactions quickly. The main goal of this study is to see if more intense RBT improves balance reactions faster than less intense RBT. The investigators will compare how quickly people improve balance reactions between high- and moderate-intensity RBT, and between RBT and a control program that does not include RBT. The investigators will also test if the improvements in balance reactions last after the training program is over. The secondary goals are to understand exactly how balance reactions improve with training, and to determine if people who complete RBT improve their general balance skills, and falls efficacy more than people who do not complete RBT.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Accidental Falls

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

High intensity reactive balance training

Participants will complete 5 1-hour training sessions over 11 days. During each training session, participants will complete 36 multi-directional (left-, right-, and forward-fall) perturbations. Participants assigned to high-intensity RBT will experience perturbations at 150% of the multi-step threshold; for example, for a multi-step threshold of 2 m/s\^2 the high intensity perturbation will be 3 m/s\^2.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Reactive balance training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Reactive balance training involves clients experiencing repeated balance perturbations so that they can practice and improve control of reactions to avoid falling after a loss of balance.

Moderate intensity reactive balance training

Participants will complete 5 1-hour training sessions over 11 days. During each training session, participants will complete 36 multi-directional (left-, right-, and forward-fall) perturbations. Participants assigned to moderate-intensity RBT will experience perturbations at 100% of the multi-step threshold; for example, for a multi-step threshold of 2 m/s\^2 the high intensity perturbation will be 2 m/s\^2.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Reactive balance training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Reactive balance training involves clients experiencing repeated balance perturbations so that they can practice and improve control of reactions to avoid falling after a loss of balance.

Walking control group

Participants assigned to the walking control group will complete 36 trials of unperturbed walking in each training session.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Walking

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Overground walking

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Reactive balance training

Reactive balance training involves clients experiencing repeated balance perturbations so that they can practice and improve control of reactions to avoid falling after a loss of balance.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Walking

Overground walking

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Perturbation-based balance training

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Community-dwelling older adults (65-80 years old)

Exclusion Criteria

* Unable to stand independently without upper-limb support for \>30 seconds and/or walk independently (without a gait aid) for ≥10 metres;
* Diagnosed neurological condition that could affect balance control (e.g., stroke, Parkinson's disease);
* Score below normative values on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment;
* Score below age-matched normative values for sensory and motor function, as assessed using the FallScreen battery;
* Have insufficient English language comprehension such that they cannot understand instructions;
* Have contraindications to reactive balance training such as severe osteoporosis; and/or
* Are currently attending physiotherapy or supervised exercise.
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Toronto Rehabilitation Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Avril Mansfield

Senior Scientist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Avril Mansfield, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Health Network, Toronto

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Health Network

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Avril Mansfield, PhD

Role: CONTACT

416-597-3422 ext. 7831

David Jagroop

Role: CONTACT

416-597-3422 ext. 7614

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

David Jagroop

Role: primary

416-597-3422 ext. 7614

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

24-5665

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Motor Training for Fall Prevention
NCT01621958 COMPLETED NA
Training Improves Balance Control
NCT01547988 COMPLETED NA
Real-life Dual-Task Training
NCT06479694 RECRUITING NA
Aging and Task-specific Training to Reduce Falls
NCT07094659 RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2