Protocol with Progestin-primed Ovarian Stimulation (PPOS) from the Beginning of Stimulation Versus Protocol with GnRH Antagonists for Ovarian Stimulation in Patients Undergoing DUOSTIM with Embryo Accumulation for PGT-A.
NCT ID: NCT06637189
Last Updated: 2024-10-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
PHASE4
144 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-10-15
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of this study is to compare two methods of ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the PPOS protocol (Group A) and the conventional protocol with injected antagonists (Group B). The goal is to determine whether both methods are equally effective in obtaining euploid embryos in the context of double ovarian stimulation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Difference Between Progestin Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol and Antagonist Protocol
NCT06738602
Comparison of Progestin Primed Ovarian Stimulation (PPOS) vs.GnRH Antagonist Methods on IVF Outcomes
NCT06396390
Live Birth Rate Between PPOS and GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Patients With Anticipated High Ovarian Response
NCT04414761
Progestin-primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol Versus GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Patients Undergoing IVF/ICSI Cycles
NCT05112692
Progestin Priming Ovarian Stimulation (PPOS) Compared With Antagonist Protocol for Freeze-all Cycles
NCT04052607
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Hypothesis: The number of euploid embryos obtained in a DUOSTIM cycle with PPOS is not inferior to that obtained with the use of antagonists.
General and Specific Objectives
Main Objective: To study if there is a difference in the number of euploid embryos obtained in two groups of patients undergoing embryo accumulation for PGT-A through double ovarian stimulation, comparing two methods of pituitary suppression: Progesterone use from the start of stimulation and the use of GnRH antagonists.
Secondary Objectives:
Evaluate if there are differences between both groups regarding the number of MII oocytes.
Evaluate if there are differences between both groups regarding the number of cumulus-oocyte complexes (COC).
Study the differences between both groups regarding the total consumption of gonadotropins.
Evaluate if there are differences between both groups regarding the number of stimulation days.
Evaluate if there are differences in fertilization rate after microinjection. Evaluate if there are differences between both groups regarding the cancellation rate.
Evaluate if there are differences between both groups regarding the number of total embryos.
Evaluate if there are differences between both groups regarding the number of embryos subjected to trophectoderm biopsy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
Patients in Group A (PPOS protocol - study group) will start controlled ovarian stimulation with the administration of FSHr gonadotropin at doses between 225 IU-300 IU/day (depending on patient characteristics) + 10 mg medroxyprogesterone/day (IMP).
Patients in Group B (Short protocol with GnRH antagonists - control group) will start controlled ovarian stimulation with the administration of FSHr gonadotropin at doses between 225 IU-300 IU/day (depending on patient characteristics) and will add treatment with a GnRH antagonist at a dose of 0.25 mg/day from the 6th day of stimulation or when a follicle with a size equal to or greater than 14 mm is present.
Once the two stimulations typical of the DuoStim strategy are completed, the results obtained in both groups will be compared.
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PPOS - study group
Patients belonging to this arm will initiate controlled ovarian stimulation by administering FSHr gonadotropin at doses between 225 IU-300 IU/day (according to patient characteristics) + 10mg medroxyprogesterone/day (IMP) from day 2-3 of their menstrual cycle.
Both groups will continue with the usual regimen of administration of all medications related to Ovarian Stimulation
Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 10 MG
Medroxyprogesterone acetate is a synthetic progestin (structurally related to progesterone) with antiestrogenic, antiandrogenic, and antigonadotropic action. It inhibits pituitary gonadotropins (FSH and LH) with consequent inhibition of follicular maturation and ovulation . Medroxyprogesterone acetate is active orally and parenterally, 15 times more potent than progesterone. In addition to inhibiting ovulation, progestins also act on the endometrium preventing implantation and increasing the viscosity of cervical mucus, which hinders sperm progression in the uterus. It also transforms a proliferative endometrium into a secretory endometrium, provided that the woman has adequate endogenous estrogen levels.
GnRH antagonists - control group
Patients belonging to this arm will initiate controlled ovarian stimulation by administering FSHr gonadotropin at doses between 225 IU-300 IU/day (according to patient characteristics) from day 2-3 of their menstrual cycle, and treatment with the GnRH antagonist at a dose of 0.25 mg/day from the 6th day of stimulation or when a follicle with a size equal to or greater than 14mm is present. Both groups will continue with the usual regimen of administration of all medications related to Ovarian Stimulation
Ganirelix
Ganirelix is a GnRH antagonist, which modulates the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis by competitively binding to GnRH receptors in the pituitary gland. Consequently, there is a reversible, intense, and rapid suppression of endogenous gonadotropin release. Ganirelix is indicated for the prevention of premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surges in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for assisted reproductive techniques (ART).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ganirelix
Ganirelix is a GnRH antagonist, which modulates the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis by competitively binding to GnRH receptors in the pituitary gland. Consequently, there is a reversible, intense, and rapid suppression of endogenous gonadotropin release. Ganirelix is indicated for the prevention of premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surges in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for assisted reproductive techniques (ART).
Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 10 MG
Medroxyprogesterone acetate is a synthetic progestin (structurally related to progesterone) with antiestrogenic, antiandrogenic, and antigonadotropic action. It inhibits pituitary gonadotropins (FSH and LH) with consequent inhibition of follicular maturation and ovulation . Medroxyprogesterone acetate is active orally and parenterally, 15 times more potent than progesterone. In addition to inhibiting ovulation, progestins also act on the endometrium preventing implantation and increasing the viscosity of cervical mucus, which hinders sperm progression in the uterus. It also transforms a proliferative endometrium into a secretory endometrium, provided that the woman has adequate endogenous estrogen levels.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Indication of IVF with PGT-A.
* Both ovaries present.
* Ability to participate and complete the study.
* Give and sign the consent to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
* Concurrent participation in another study
18 Years
43 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Theramex
INDUSTRY
Ginefiv
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Martinez F, Rodriguez-Purata J, Beatriz Rodriguez D, Clua E, Rodriguez I, Coroleu B. Desogestrel versus antagonist injections for LH suppression in oocyte donation cycles: a crossover study. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019 Oct;35(10):878-883. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2019.1604661. Epub 2019 May 7.
Dong M, Sun L, Huang L, Wang F, Zhang X, Liu F. Fixed Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist Protocol Versus Flexible Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol in Patients With Asynchronous Follicular Development During Controlled Ovulation Stimulation: A Retrospective Study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 18;12:690575. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.690575. eCollection 2021.
Xiao ZN, Peng JL, Yang J, Xu WM. Flexible GnRH Antagonist Protocol versus Progestin-primed Ovarian Stimulation (PPOS) Protocol in Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Ovarian Response. Curr Med Sci. 2019 Jun;39(3):431-436. doi: 10.1007/s11596-019-2055-x. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
Giles J, Alama P, Gamiz P, Vidal C, Badia P, Pellicer A, Bosch E. Medroxyprogesterone acetate is a useful alternative to a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in oocyte donation: a randomized, controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2021 Aug;116(2):404-412. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.02.036. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
Begueria R, Garcia D, Vassena R, Rodriguez A. Medroxyprogesterone acetate versus ganirelix in oocyte donation: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2019 May 1;34(5):872-880. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez034.
Wang N, Zhu Q, Ma M, Liang Z, Tao Y, Wang Y, Kuang Y. Comparison of a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol with a flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome who are participating in an IVF programme: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 2;10(12):e038153. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038153.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2023-508769-33
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2306-GFMAD-129-CB
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.