Protocol with Progestin-primed Ovarian Stimulation (PPOS) from the Beginning of Stimulation Versus Protocol with GnRH Antagonists for Ovarian Stimulation in Patients Undergoing DUOSTIM with Embryo Accumulation for PGT-A.

NCT ID: NCT06637189

Last Updated: 2024-10-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

144 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-10-15

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The PPOS protocol (Progestin-primed Ovarian Stimulation) involves avoiding ovulation during ovarian stimulation with progesterone. It is a reliable and safe protocol that has been widely used in recent years for in vitro fertilization, as it reduces the number of injections needed during controlled ovarian stimulation and is more cost-effective for patients.

The aim of this study is to compare two methods of ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the PPOS protocol (Group A) and the conventional protocol with injected antagonists (Group B). The goal is to determine whether both methods are equally effective in obtaining euploid embryos in the context of double ovarian stimulation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Hypothesis:

Hypothesis: The number of euploid embryos obtained in a DUOSTIM cycle with PPOS is not inferior to that obtained with the use of antagonists.

General and Specific Objectives

Main Objective: To study if there is a difference in the number of euploid embryos obtained in two groups of patients undergoing embryo accumulation for PGT-A through double ovarian stimulation, comparing two methods of pituitary suppression: Progesterone use from the start of stimulation and the use of GnRH antagonists.

Secondary Objectives:

Evaluate if there are differences between both groups regarding the number of MII oocytes.

Evaluate if there are differences between both groups regarding the number of cumulus-oocyte complexes (COC).

Study the differences between both groups regarding the total consumption of gonadotropins.

Evaluate if there are differences between both groups regarding the number of stimulation days.

Evaluate if there are differences in fertilization rate after microinjection. Evaluate if there are differences between both groups regarding the cancellation rate.

Evaluate if there are differences between both groups regarding the number of total embryos.

Evaluate if there are differences between both groups regarding the number of embryos subjected to trophectoderm biopsy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stimulation in the Ovary Embryo Oocyte Oocyte Retrieval Fertilization in Vitro Blastocyst PGT-A

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This is a prospective, randomized non-inferiority study. There will be two groups of patients:

Patients in Group A (PPOS protocol - study group) will start controlled ovarian stimulation with the administration of FSHr gonadotropin at doses between 225 IU-300 IU/day (depending on patient characteristics) + 10 mg medroxyprogesterone/day (IMP).

Patients in Group B (Short protocol with GnRH antagonists - control group) will start controlled ovarian stimulation with the administration of FSHr gonadotropin at doses between 225 IU-300 IU/day (depending on patient characteristics) and will add treatment with a GnRH antagonist at a dose of 0.25 mg/day from the 6th day of stimulation or when a follicle with a size equal to or greater than 14 mm is present.

Once the two stimulations typical of the DuoStim strategy are completed, the results obtained in both groups will be compared.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PPOS - study group

Patients belonging to this arm will initiate controlled ovarian stimulation by administering FSHr gonadotropin at doses between 225 IU-300 IU/day (according to patient characteristics) + 10mg medroxyprogesterone/day (IMP) from day 2-3 of their menstrual cycle.

Both groups will continue with the usual regimen of administration of all medications related to Ovarian Stimulation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 10 MG

Intervention Type DRUG

Medroxyprogesterone acetate is a synthetic progestin (structurally related to progesterone) with antiestrogenic, antiandrogenic, and antigonadotropic action. It inhibits pituitary gonadotropins (FSH and LH) with consequent inhibition of follicular maturation and ovulation . Medroxyprogesterone acetate is active orally and parenterally, 15 times more potent than progesterone. In addition to inhibiting ovulation, progestins also act on the endometrium preventing implantation and increasing the viscosity of cervical mucus, which hinders sperm progression in the uterus. It also transforms a proliferative endometrium into a secretory endometrium, provided that the woman has adequate endogenous estrogen levels.

GnRH antagonists - control group

Patients belonging to this arm will initiate controlled ovarian stimulation by administering FSHr gonadotropin at doses between 225 IU-300 IU/day (according to patient characteristics) from day 2-3 of their menstrual cycle, and treatment with the GnRH antagonist at a dose of 0.25 mg/day from the 6th day of stimulation or when a follicle with a size equal to or greater than 14mm is present. Both groups will continue with the usual regimen of administration of all medications related to Ovarian Stimulation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ganirelix

Intervention Type DRUG

Ganirelix is a GnRH antagonist, which modulates the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis by competitively binding to GnRH receptors in the pituitary gland. Consequently, there is a reversible, intense, and rapid suppression of endogenous gonadotropin release. Ganirelix is indicated for the prevention of premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surges in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for assisted reproductive techniques (ART).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ganirelix

Ganirelix is a GnRH antagonist, which modulates the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis by competitively binding to GnRH receptors in the pituitary gland. Consequently, there is a reversible, intense, and rapid suppression of endogenous gonadotropin release. Ganirelix is indicated for the prevention of premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surges in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for assisted reproductive techniques (ART).

Intervention Type DRUG

Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 10 MG

Medroxyprogesterone acetate is a synthetic progestin (structurally related to progesterone) with antiestrogenic, antiandrogenic, and antigonadotropic action. It inhibits pituitary gonadotropins (FSH and LH) with consequent inhibition of follicular maturation and ovulation . Medroxyprogesterone acetate is active orally and parenterally, 15 times more potent than progesterone. In addition to inhibiting ovulation, progestins also act on the endometrium preventing implantation and increasing the viscosity of cervical mucus, which hinders sperm progression in the uterus. It also transforms a proliferative endometrium into a secretory endometrium, provided that the woman has adequate endogenous estrogen levels.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Regular menstrual cycles between 21 and 35 days, inclusive.
* Indication of IVF with PGT-A.
* Both ovaries present.
* Ability to participate and complete the study.
* Give and sign the consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* Endometriosis grade III/IV
* Concurrent participation in another study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

43 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Theramex

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ginefiv

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Claudia Blancafort González-Casabón, MD

Role: CONTACT

+34647437121

Joaquín Llácer, phD

Role: CONTACT

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Martinez F, Rodriguez-Purata J, Beatriz Rodriguez D, Clua E, Rodriguez I, Coroleu B. Desogestrel versus antagonist injections for LH suppression in oocyte donation cycles: a crossover study. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019 Oct;35(10):878-883. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2019.1604661. Epub 2019 May 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31062995 (View on PubMed)

Dong M, Sun L, Huang L, Wang F, Zhang X, Liu F. Fixed Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist Protocol Versus Flexible Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol in Patients With Asynchronous Follicular Development During Controlled Ovulation Stimulation: A Retrospective Study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 18;12:690575. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.690575. eCollection 2021.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34867773 (View on PubMed)

Xiao ZN, Peng JL, Yang J, Xu WM. Flexible GnRH Antagonist Protocol versus Progestin-primed Ovarian Stimulation (PPOS) Protocol in Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Ovarian Response. Curr Med Sci. 2019 Jun;39(3):431-436. doi: 10.1007/s11596-019-2055-x. Epub 2019 Jun 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31209815 (View on PubMed)

Giles J, Alama P, Gamiz P, Vidal C, Badia P, Pellicer A, Bosch E. Medroxyprogesterone acetate is a useful alternative to a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in oocyte donation: a randomized, controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2021 Aug;116(2):404-412. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.02.036. Epub 2021 Apr 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33814126 (View on PubMed)

Begueria R, Garcia D, Vassena R, Rodriguez A. Medroxyprogesterone acetate versus ganirelix in oocyte donation: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2019 May 1;34(5):872-880. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez034.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30927417 (View on PubMed)

Wang N, Zhu Q, Ma M, Liang Z, Tao Y, Wang Y, Kuang Y. Comparison of a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol with a flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome who are participating in an IVF programme: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 2;10(12):e038153. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038153.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33268401 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2023-508769-33

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2306-GFMAD-129-CB

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.