Retrospective Analysis of Prismaflex HF20 Set Versus ppCRRT Registry

NCT ID: NCT06633029

Last Updated: 2025-02-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

106 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-12-11

Study Completion Date

2025-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A retrospective multicenter, observational design intended to capture data on pediatrics (weighing between 8 - 20 kg) who underwent continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) using the HF20 set. Data will be compared with a similar population (weighting 8-20 kg) from the ppCRRT registry who received CRRT with Prismaflex M60 sets.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study aims to compare patient outcomes after treatment with HF20 based CRRT to the historical ppCRRT registry. Data from eligible patient records will be collected, starting from January 2008 to most recent in Canada and from January 2020 to most recent in the US.

The ppCRRT registry used a prospective observational format whereby de-identified data on patients and CRRT circuits were collected from 13 participating centers across the US between 2001 JAN 01 and 2005 AUG 31. The registry's primary outcome measure was patient survival to ICU discharge.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Renal Failure (ARF) Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) Fluid Overload in Dialysis Patients

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Prismaflex HF20 cohort

Data collected from this study

Pediatrics (weighing between 8 and 20 kg) who received CRRT with Prismaflex HF20 between 2008 to current in Canada or between 2020 to current in the US

Prismaflex HF20

Intervention Type DEVICE

CRRT fluid management and reduction of uremic toxins.

Prismaflex M60 cohort

Data from ppCRRT registry used for comparison

Pediatrics (weighing between 8 and 20 kg) who received CRRT with Prismaflex M60 sets

Prismaflex M60

Intervention Type DEVICE

CRRT fluid management and reduction of uremic toxins.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Prismaflex HF20

CRRT fluid management and reduction of uremic toxins.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Prismaflex M60

CRRT fluid management and reduction of uremic toxins.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient weighed between 8 and 20 kg (17.6 - 44.1 lb).
2. Patient received medical care in an intensive care unit (ICU) and was treated with HF20 based CRRT.
3. Patient had a clinical diagnosis of AKI or ARF or fluid overload requiring CRRT.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Baxter Healthcare Corporation

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Lucile Packard Children's Hospital Stanford

Palo Alto, California, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Children's Hospital Colorado

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Ann and Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Children's Medical Center of Dallas

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Seattle Children's Hospital Research and Foundation

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Baxter CORP Clinical Trials Disclosure

Role: CONTACT

(224) 948-7359

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BXU602071

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.