The Ability of Chronic Pain Patients to Self-diagnose Their Chief Source of Low Back Pain

NCT ID: NCT06630676

Last Updated: 2025-06-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

269 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-10-16

Study Completion Date

2026-10-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigative team will provide 27 slides with bullet points and images of pain referral patterns for different causes (e.g., herniated disc, facet joint arthritis) for patients seen for a new visit with a chief complaint of chronic low back pain. This material is all publicly available but has been compiled in presentation form. This will have educational benefit for patients, discussing clinical signs and symptoms, risk factors and basic treatments. There will also be a smaller control group of that gets a condensed 4-slide presentation. After review of the slides, an independent observer will ask the patient what they think are the 2 most likely causes of their LBP (in order of likelihood) and match that with the attending physician and trainee, who will independently do the same. The investigative team will then determine how concordant the patient's answers are with the physicians and also record outcomes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Artificial intelligence (AI), the growth of the internet and internet access, direct-to-patient advertising, and more recently the COVID-19 pandemic with a proliferation of telehealth visits has transformed medicine. Patients come in with a wealth of information, some accurate but some inaccurate, about their condition, often with preconceived notions about what condition they have and how they want to be treated. For conditions such as chronic pain with a high prevalence rate of abnormal imaging findings in asymptomatic individuals, the absence of biomarkers for clear-cut diagnoses, and subjective outcome measures, this has led to unnecessary tests and treatment, doctor shopping, high rates of burnout among providers and low success rates.

The COVID-19 pandemic shed light on accuracy of diagnoses via telehealth, with studies finding a high concordance rate between telehealth visits without the benefit of a physical exam, and in-person pain management consultant, which is similar to that found in other specialties. The proliferation of AI in electronic medical record systems that confer diagnoses based on patient and physician input of symptoms and signs suggests that in the future, patients with access to the information will be able to self-diagnose their chronic pain and other conditions. Many guidelines also recommend education and self-care in their back pain treatment algorithms, though the effect of education on outcomes is not well-known.

With this in mind, the purpose of this study is to determine how accurate patient diagnoses are when they are furnished with readily available information on the different etiologies for chronic low back pain (LBP), the leading cause of disability worldwide.

The plan is to enroll 269 patients in a 3:1 allocation ratio to either the 27-slide educational group or a condensed 4-slide control group. The patient will have the opportunity to ask questions, after which they will rate their top 2 diagnoses, in order. A trainee (resident or fellow) and the attending will do then do the same. Outcomes will be recorded at 4 weeks (e.g., for simple injections such as epidural steroids and sacroiliac joint injections, medications, physical therapy) or at 12 weeks for more invasive procedures such as spinal cord stimulation, radiofrequency ablation, or vertebral augmentation.

Analyses will be performed to: 1) Determine whether the educational program improves the likelihood that the patient correctly self-diagnoses the cause of their back pain using the attending physician as the reference standard compared to the control group; and 2) Whether the educational program improves treatment outcomes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Low Back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients will be randomized to a comprehensive educational program consisting of 28 slides and answering questions, or a control group (4 brief slides)
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
The outcome assessor will not be privy to the treatment group.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Education

Educational initiative on back pain

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Education

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Patients will review 27 slides that discuss the different etiologies (causes) of back pain, how common they are, what causes them (e.g., wear and tear, trauma), factors that exacerbate and alleviate the pain, how they are diagnosed and treated, and have an opportunity to ask questions.

Control

Control initiative (non-comprehensive overview)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Control

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Brief 4-slide presentation without a separate session for questions and answers

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Control

Brief 4-slide presentation without a separate session for questions and answers

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Education

Patients will review 27 slides that discuss the different etiologies (causes) of back pain, how common they are, what causes them (e.g., wear and tear, trauma), factors that exacerbate and alleviate the pain, how they are diagnosed and treated, and have an opportunity to ask questions.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* • Age \> 18 years

* Primary complaint of LBP or sciatica
* Duration of LBP \> 3 months

Exclusion Criteria

* • Referral for a specific diagnostic procedure or who present with a pre-established diagnosis

* Inability to understand written English
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Northwestern University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Steven Cohen

Vice Chair of Research and Pain Medicine, Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Northwestern University Pain Management Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Steven Cohen, MD

Role: CONTACT

3126952500

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Jordan Wood, BS

Role: primary

3126952500

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lepri B, Romani D, Storari L, Barbari V. Effectiveness of Pain Neuroscience Education in Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain and Central Sensitization: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 24;20(5):4098. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054098.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36901108 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HRP-593/ v11102023

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.