Pain Neuroscience Education for Acute and Sub-Acute Low Back Pain

NCT ID: NCT03722394

Last Updated: 2018-10-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-01-10

Study Completion Date

2018-07-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To determine if Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) would result in positive clinical changes in patients presenting with acute or sub-acute low back pain (LBP).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: Pain neuroscience education (PNE) has shown efficacy in treating chronic pain. Clinicians may believe PNE is not suitable for acute and sub-acute pain. Subgroupings of low back pain (LBP) imply some patients with LBP may respond favorably to PNE.

Objective: To determine if PNE would result in positive clinical changes in patients presenting with acute or sub-acute LBP.

Methods: Eighty consecutive patients with LBP \< 3 months were enrolled in the study. Patients completed a demographics questionnaire, leg and LBP rating (Numeric Pain Rating Scale - NPRS), disability (Oswestry Disability Index), fear-avoidance (Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire), pain catastrophization (Pain Catastrophization Scale), central sensitization (Central Sensitization Inventory), pain knowledge (Revised Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire), risk assessment (Keele STarT Back Screening Tool), active trunk flexion and straight leg raise (SLR). Patients received a 15-minute verbal, one-on-one PNE session, followed by repeat measurement of LBP and leg pain (NPRS), trunk flexion and SLR.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Low Back Pain Pain, Chronic Pain, Back

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Observational cohort
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Pain Neuroscience Education

Subjects received a 15-minute verbal, one-on-one Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) session

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Pain Neuroscience Education

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

15 minute verbal one-on-one education session

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pain Neuroscience Education

15 minute verbal one-on-one education session

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* a complaint of LBP with or without leg pain less than 3 months, and
* a willingness to participate

Exclusion Criteria

* a) were under age 18 (minor);
* b) had undergone lumbar surgery;
* c) could not read or understand the English language;
* d) presented with any cognitive deficits rendering them unsuitable for PNE (i.e., stroke, traumatic brain injury, etc.),
* e) declined to participate or
* f) presented with a medical etiology (red flag) associated with their LBP.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

St. Ambrose University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Nevada, Las Vegas

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Emilio J Puentedura, PT, DPT, PhD

Project Coordinator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kevin Farrell, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

St. Ambrose University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Nevada Las Vegas

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1202-4022

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.