Mediators and Moderators of Pain Neuroscience Education on Disability of Patients With Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT ID: NCT04399473
Last Updated: 2025-01-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
249 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-11-29
2021-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pain Neuroscience Education for Acute and Sub-Acute Low Back Pain
NCT03722394
Effectiveness of Pain Neuroscience Education Compared to a Conventional Education for Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT04179708
Patient Education for Patients With Back Pain Referred to Physical Therapy
NCT02648373
Pain Neuroscience Education Combined With Lumbar Stabilization Exercises on Disability and Kinesiophobia Among Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT07307859
Research Study on Patient Education for People With Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT06492642
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Pain neuroscience education (PNE) is a cognitive-based education that helps to educate patients about pain by focusing on neurobiology, neurophysiology and the processing and representation of pain. Even though PNE as intervention helps to improve pain, disability and other patient outcome, mixed results on its efficacy have seen in many studies. Since any complicated interventions are usually assessed by their effects on outcomes such as disability and pain, most do not target these outcomes directly; instead, they target mediating factors that are assumed to cause changes in these outcomes. In particular self-efficacy, pain catastrophizing and a patient's beliefs about back pain are thought to mediate the PNE-disability relationship since most of these cognitive factors are either highly correlated with disability or predictors for disability. The justifications for choosing these potential mediating factors: (1) self-efficacy has been shown to mediate the development of disability and is the most commonly identified mediator for psychological and behavior change interventions; (2) a study has shown that higher levels of pain catastrophizing are strongly correlated with higher levels of pain intensity and disability; and (3) a study has shown that beliefs about the consequences of LBP can influence patients' perceived pain and disability. However, the mechanisms underlying PNE effects, or the effect of PNE on mediating factors and its subsequent effect on disability as an outcome, has not been yet investigated. That leads to a knowledge gap in the evidence for understanding how PNE exerts its effect on disability. Also, identifying potential moderating factors that influence the PNE-disability relationship needs further investigation. In particular, expectation is thought to moderate the PNE-disability relationship because there are studies identified a link between expectation and clinical outcomes in patients with LBP. No study has explored the relationship between expectancy and clinical outcomes in the context of PNE. So, the influence of patient expectation on the magnitude of PNE effect on disability needs investigation.
The purpose of this 18-months project is understanding the underlying mechanisms of how PNE impacts disability. This project is significant because it will help us understand how PNE works by studying the underlying mechanisms and for whom and under what circumstances will PNE produces the greatest clinical benefits on the disability for patients with chronic LBP. Knowing how certain factors work will help PTs to enhance the elements of PNE that hopefully will target patient-specific factors and subsequently will reduce disability.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control group: Usual PT Care
No interventions assigned to this group
Experimental group: PNE + Usual PT Care
Participants in this arm will receive PNE education in addition to Usual PT Care
Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE)
Participates in the experimental group will receive 15mins X 4 sessions of pain education by the eligible trained physical therapist in addition to usual care PT treatment.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE)
Participates in the experimental group will receive 15mins X 4 sessions of pain education by the eligible trained physical therapist in addition to usual care PT treatment.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Pain \>12 weeks.
3. Oswestry disability score =\>20%.
Exclusion Criteria
2. No evidence of "Red flags" conditions (e.g., cauda equina, neurological deficits, cancer, fracture or infection).
3. Not currently receiving any intervention for LBP from other healthcare provider (e.g., physical therapy, massage therapy, etc.).
4. Not currently known to be pregnant.
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Utah
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
East Jeddah General Hospital-Physical Therapy Department
Jeddah, Mecca Region, Saudi Arabia
King Abdulaziz Hospital-Rehabilitation Center
Jeddah, Mecca Region, Saudi Arabia
King Fahad General Hospital-Physical Therapy Department
Jeddah, Mecca Region, Saudi Arabia
King Abdullah Complex-Physical Therapy Department
Jeddah, Mecca Region, Saudi Arabia
King Fiasal Hospital-Physical Therapy Department
Ta'if, Mecca Region, Saudi Arabia
King Abdulaziz Hospital-Phyiscal Therapy Department
Ta'if, Mecca Region, Saudi Arabia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
133302
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.